Cargando…

Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing

Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a challenge for many industries. Over the last decade, novel strain monitoring methods using optical fibers have been implemented for SHM in aerospace, energy storage, marine, and civil engineering structures. However, the practical attachment of optical fibers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shaoquan, Sæter, Erik, Lasn, Kaspar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206879
_version_ 1784589033642393600
author Wang, Shaoquan
Sæter, Erik
Lasn, Kaspar
author_facet Wang, Shaoquan
Sæter, Erik
Lasn, Kaspar
author_sort Wang, Shaoquan
collection PubMed
description Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a challenge for many industries. Over the last decade, novel strain monitoring methods using optical fibers have been implemented for SHM in aerospace, energy storage, marine, and civil engineering structures. However, the practical attachment of optical fibers (OFs) to the component is still problematic. While monitoring, the amount of substrate strain lost by the OF attachment is often unclear, and difficult to predict under long-term loads. This investigation clarifies how different attachment methods perform under time-dependent loading. Optical fibers are attached on metal, thermoset composite, and thermoplastic substrates for distributed strain sensing. Strains along distributed optical fiber sensors (DOFS) are measured by optical backscatter reflectometry (OBR) and compared to contact extensometer strains under tensile creep loading. The quality of the bondline and its influence on the strain transfer is analyzed. Residual strains and strain fluctuations along the sensor fiber are correlated to the fiber attachment method. Results show that a machine-controlled attachment process (such as in situ 3-D printing) holds great promise for the future as it achieves a highly uniform bondline and provides accurate strain measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8540630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85406302021-10-24 Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing Wang, Shaoquan Sæter, Erik Lasn, Kaspar Sensors (Basel) Article Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a challenge for many industries. Over the last decade, novel strain monitoring methods using optical fibers have been implemented for SHM in aerospace, energy storage, marine, and civil engineering structures. However, the practical attachment of optical fibers (OFs) to the component is still problematic. While monitoring, the amount of substrate strain lost by the OF attachment is often unclear, and difficult to predict under long-term loads. This investigation clarifies how different attachment methods perform under time-dependent loading. Optical fibers are attached on metal, thermoset composite, and thermoplastic substrates for distributed strain sensing. Strains along distributed optical fiber sensors (DOFS) are measured by optical backscatter reflectometry (OBR) and compared to contact extensometer strains under tensile creep loading. The quality of the bondline and its influence on the strain transfer is analyzed. Residual strains and strain fluctuations along the sensor fiber are correlated to the fiber attachment method. Results show that a machine-controlled attachment process (such as in situ 3-D printing) holds great promise for the future as it achieves a highly uniform bondline and provides accurate strain measurements. MDPI 2021-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8540630/ /pubmed/34696093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206879 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Shaoquan
Sæter, Erik
Lasn, Kaspar
Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing
title Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing
title_full Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing
title_fullStr Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing
title_short Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing
title_sort comparison of dofs attachment methods for time-dependent strain sensing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206879
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshaoquan comparisonofdofsattachmentmethodsfortimedependentstrainsensing
AT sætererik comparisonofdofsattachmentmethodsfortimedependentstrainsensing
AT lasnkaspar comparisonofdofsattachmentmethodsfortimedependentstrainsensing