Cargando…
Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing
Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a challenge for many industries. Over the last decade, novel strain monitoring methods using optical fibers have been implemented for SHM in aerospace, energy storage, marine, and civil engineering structures. However, the practical attachment of optical fibers...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206879 |
_version_ | 1784589033642393600 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Shaoquan Sæter, Erik Lasn, Kaspar |
author_facet | Wang, Shaoquan Sæter, Erik Lasn, Kaspar |
author_sort | Wang, Shaoquan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a challenge for many industries. Over the last decade, novel strain monitoring methods using optical fibers have been implemented for SHM in aerospace, energy storage, marine, and civil engineering structures. However, the practical attachment of optical fibers (OFs) to the component is still problematic. While monitoring, the amount of substrate strain lost by the OF attachment is often unclear, and difficult to predict under long-term loads. This investigation clarifies how different attachment methods perform under time-dependent loading. Optical fibers are attached on metal, thermoset composite, and thermoplastic substrates for distributed strain sensing. Strains along distributed optical fiber sensors (DOFS) are measured by optical backscatter reflectometry (OBR) and compared to contact extensometer strains under tensile creep loading. The quality of the bondline and its influence on the strain transfer is analyzed. Residual strains and strain fluctuations along the sensor fiber are correlated to the fiber attachment method. Results show that a machine-controlled attachment process (such as in situ 3-D printing) holds great promise for the future as it achieves a highly uniform bondline and provides accurate strain measurements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8540630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85406302021-10-24 Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing Wang, Shaoquan Sæter, Erik Lasn, Kaspar Sensors (Basel) Article Structural health monitoring (SHM) is a challenge for many industries. Over the last decade, novel strain monitoring methods using optical fibers have been implemented for SHM in aerospace, energy storage, marine, and civil engineering structures. However, the practical attachment of optical fibers (OFs) to the component is still problematic. While monitoring, the amount of substrate strain lost by the OF attachment is often unclear, and difficult to predict under long-term loads. This investigation clarifies how different attachment methods perform under time-dependent loading. Optical fibers are attached on metal, thermoset composite, and thermoplastic substrates for distributed strain sensing. Strains along distributed optical fiber sensors (DOFS) are measured by optical backscatter reflectometry (OBR) and compared to contact extensometer strains under tensile creep loading. The quality of the bondline and its influence on the strain transfer is analyzed. Residual strains and strain fluctuations along the sensor fiber are correlated to the fiber attachment method. Results show that a machine-controlled attachment process (such as in situ 3-D printing) holds great promise for the future as it achieves a highly uniform bondline and provides accurate strain measurements. MDPI 2021-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8540630/ /pubmed/34696093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206879 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Shaoquan Sæter, Erik Lasn, Kaspar Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing |
title | Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing |
title_full | Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing |
title_fullStr | Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing |
title_short | Comparison of DOFS Attachment Methods for Time-Dependent Strain Sensing |
title_sort | comparison of dofs attachment methods for time-dependent strain sensing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696093 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206879 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshaoquan comparisonofdofsattachmentmethodsfortimedependentstrainsensing AT sætererik comparisonofdofsattachmentmethodsfortimedependentstrainsensing AT lasnkaspar comparisonofdofsattachmentmethodsfortimedependentstrainsensing |