Cargando…
Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging
Many successful variational regularization methods employed to solve linear inverse problems in imaging applications (such as image deblurring, image inpainting, and computed tomography) aim at enhancing edges in the solution, and often involve non-smooth regularization terms (e.g., total variation)...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100216 |
_version_ | 1784589051725086720 |
---|---|
author | Gazzola, Silvia Scott, Sebastian James Spence, Alastair |
author_facet | Gazzola, Silvia Scott, Sebastian James Spence, Alastair |
author_sort | Gazzola, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many successful variational regularization methods employed to solve linear inverse problems in imaging applications (such as image deblurring, image inpainting, and computed tomography) aim at enhancing edges in the solution, and often involve non-smooth regularization terms (e.g., total variation). Such regularization methods can be treated as iteratively reweighted least squares problems (IRLS), which are usually solved by the repeated application of a Krylov projection method. This approach gives rise to an inner–outer iterative scheme where the outer iterations update the weights and the inner iterations solve a least squares problem with fixed weights. Recently, flexible or generalized Krylov solvers, which avoid inner–outer iterations by incorporating iteration-dependent weights within a single approximation subspace for the solution, have been devised to efficiently handle IRLS problems. Indeed, substantial computational savings are generally possible by avoiding the repeated application of a traditional Krylov solver. This paper aims to extend the available flexible Krylov algorithms in order to handle a variety of edge-enhancing regularization terms, with computationally convenient adaptive regularization parameter choice. In order to tackle both square and rectangular linear systems, flexible Krylov methods based on the so-called flexible Golub–Kahan decomposition are considered. Some theoretical results are presented (including a convergence proof) and numerical comparisons with other edge-enhancing solvers show that the new methods compute solutions of similar or better quality, with increased speedup. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8540705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85407052021-10-28 Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging Gazzola, Silvia Scott, Sebastian James Spence, Alastair J Imaging Article Many successful variational regularization methods employed to solve linear inverse problems in imaging applications (such as image deblurring, image inpainting, and computed tomography) aim at enhancing edges in the solution, and often involve non-smooth regularization terms (e.g., total variation). Such regularization methods can be treated as iteratively reweighted least squares problems (IRLS), which are usually solved by the repeated application of a Krylov projection method. This approach gives rise to an inner–outer iterative scheme where the outer iterations update the weights and the inner iterations solve a least squares problem with fixed weights. Recently, flexible or generalized Krylov solvers, which avoid inner–outer iterations by incorporating iteration-dependent weights within a single approximation subspace for the solution, have been devised to efficiently handle IRLS problems. Indeed, substantial computational savings are generally possible by avoiding the repeated application of a traditional Krylov solver. This paper aims to extend the available flexible Krylov algorithms in order to handle a variety of edge-enhancing regularization terms, with computationally convenient adaptive regularization parameter choice. In order to tackle both square and rectangular linear systems, flexible Krylov methods based on the so-called flexible Golub–Kahan decomposition are considered. Some theoretical results are presented (including a convergence proof) and numerical comparisons with other edge-enhancing solvers show that the new methods compute solutions of similar or better quality, with increased speedup. MDPI 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8540705/ /pubmed/34677302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100216 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gazzola, Silvia Scott, Sebastian James Spence, Alastair Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging |
title | Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging |
title_full | Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging |
title_fullStr | Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging |
title_short | Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging |
title_sort | flexible krylov methods for edge enhancement in imaging |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gazzolasilvia flexiblekrylovmethodsforedgeenhancementinimaging AT scottsebastianjames flexiblekrylovmethodsforedgeenhancementinimaging AT spencealastair flexiblekrylovmethodsforedgeenhancementinimaging |