Cargando…

Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging

Many successful variational regularization methods employed to solve linear inverse problems in imaging applications (such as image deblurring, image inpainting, and computed tomography) aim at enhancing edges in the solution, and often involve non-smooth regularization terms (e.g., total variation)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gazzola, Silvia, Scott, Sebastian James, Spence, Alastair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100216
_version_ 1784589051725086720
author Gazzola, Silvia
Scott, Sebastian James
Spence, Alastair
author_facet Gazzola, Silvia
Scott, Sebastian James
Spence, Alastair
author_sort Gazzola, Silvia
collection PubMed
description Many successful variational regularization methods employed to solve linear inverse problems in imaging applications (such as image deblurring, image inpainting, and computed tomography) aim at enhancing edges in the solution, and often involve non-smooth regularization terms (e.g., total variation). Such regularization methods can be treated as iteratively reweighted least squares problems (IRLS), which are usually solved by the repeated application of a Krylov projection method. This approach gives rise to an inner–outer iterative scheme where the outer iterations update the weights and the inner iterations solve a least squares problem with fixed weights. Recently, flexible or generalized Krylov solvers, which avoid inner–outer iterations by incorporating iteration-dependent weights within a single approximation subspace for the solution, have been devised to efficiently handle IRLS problems. Indeed, substantial computational savings are generally possible by avoiding the repeated application of a traditional Krylov solver. This paper aims to extend the available flexible Krylov algorithms in order to handle a variety of edge-enhancing regularization terms, with computationally convenient adaptive regularization parameter choice. In order to tackle both square and rectangular linear systems, flexible Krylov methods based on the so-called flexible Golub–Kahan decomposition are considered. Some theoretical results are presented (including a convergence proof) and numerical comparisons with other edge-enhancing solvers show that the new methods compute solutions of similar or better quality, with increased speedup.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8540705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85407052021-10-28 Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging Gazzola, Silvia Scott, Sebastian James Spence, Alastair J Imaging Article Many successful variational regularization methods employed to solve linear inverse problems in imaging applications (such as image deblurring, image inpainting, and computed tomography) aim at enhancing edges in the solution, and often involve non-smooth regularization terms (e.g., total variation). Such regularization methods can be treated as iteratively reweighted least squares problems (IRLS), which are usually solved by the repeated application of a Krylov projection method. This approach gives rise to an inner–outer iterative scheme where the outer iterations update the weights and the inner iterations solve a least squares problem with fixed weights. Recently, flexible or generalized Krylov solvers, which avoid inner–outer iterations by incorporating iteration-dependent weights within a single approximation subspace for the solution, have been devised to efficiently handle IRLS problems. Indeed, substantial computational savings are generally possible by avoiding the repeated application of a traditional Krylov solver. This paper aims to extend the available flexible Krylov algorithms in order to handle a variety of edge-enhancing regularization terms, with computationally convenient adaptive regularization parameter choice. In order to tackle both square and rectangular linear systems, flexible Krylov methods based on the so-called flexible Golub–Kahan decomposition are considered. Some theoretical results are presented (including a convergence proof) and numerical comparisons with other edge-enhancing solvers show that the new methods compute solutions of similar or better quality, with increased speedup. MDPI 2021-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8540705/ /pubmed/34677302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100216 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gazzola, Silvia
Scott, Sebastian James
Spence, Alastair
Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging
title Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging
title_full Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging
title_fullStr Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging
title_short Flexible Krylov Methods for Edge Enhancement in Imaging
title_sort flexible krylov methods for edge enhancement in imaging
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34677302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging7100216
work_keys_str_mv AT gazzolasilvia flexiblekrylovmethodsforedgeenhancementinimaging
AT scottsebastianjames flexiblekrylovmethodsforedgeenhancementinimaging
AT spencealastair flexiblekrylovmethodsforedgeenhancementinimaging