Cargando…

Comparison of Two Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Models

The study of biofilms in vitro is complex and often limited by technical problems due to simplified models. Here, we compared C. acnes biofilm formation, from species involved in bone and prosthesis infection, in a static model with a dynamic model. Using similar parameters, the percentage of live b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varin-Simon, Jennifer, Lamret, Fabien, Colin, Marius, Gangloff, Sophie C., Mongaret, Céline, Reffuveille, Fany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102035
_version_ 1784589112778424320
author Varin-Simon, Jennifer
Lamret, Fabien
Colin, Marius
Gangloff, Sophie C.
Mongaret, Céline
Reffuveille, Fany
author_facet Varin-Simon, Jennifer
Lamret, Fabien
Colin, Marius
Gangloff, Sophie C.
Mongaret, Céline
Reffuveille, Fany
author_sort Varin-Simon, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description The study of biofilms in vitro is complex and often limited by technical problems due to simplified models. Here, we compared C. acnes biofilm formation, from species involved in bone and prosthesis infection, in a static model with a dynamic model. Using similar parameters, the percentage of live bacteria within the biofilm was higher in dynamic than in static approach. In both models, bacterial internalization in osteoblast-like cells, playing the role of stress factor, affected this proportion but in opposite ways: increase of live bacteria proportion in the static model (×2.04 ± 0.53) and of dead bacteria proportion (×3.5 ± 1.03) in the dynamic model. This work highlights the huge importance in the selection of a relevant biofilm model in accordance with the environmental or clinical context to effectively improve the understanding of biofilms and the development of better antibiofilm strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8540958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85409582021-10-24 Comparison of Two Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Models Varin-Simon, Jennifer Lamret, Fabien Colin, Marius Gangloff, Sophie C. Mongaret, Céline Reffuveille, Fany Microorganisms Communication The study of biofilms in vitro is complex and often limited by technical problems due to simplified models. Here, we compared C. acnes biofilm formation, from species involved in bone and prosthesis infection, in a static model with a dynamic model. Using similar parameters, the percentage of live bacteria within the biofilm was higher in dynamic than in static approach. In both models, bacterial internalization in osteoblast-like cells, playing the role of stress factor, affected this proportion but in opposite ways: increase of live bacteria proportion in the static model (×2.04 ± 0.53) and of dead bacteria proportion (×3.5 ± 1.03) in the dynamic model. This work highlights the huge importance in the selection of a relevant biofilm model in accordance with the environmental or clinical context to effectively improve the understanding of biofilms and the development of better antibiofilm strategies. MDPI 2021-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8540958/ /pubmed/34683356 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102035 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Varin-Simon, Jennifer
Lamret, Fabien
Colin, Marius
Gangloff, Sophie C.
Mongaret, Céline
Reffuveille, Fany
Comparison of Two Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Models
title Comparison of Two Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Models
title_full Comparison of Two Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Models
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Models
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Models
title_short Comparison of Two Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Models
title_sort comparison of two cutibacterium acnes biofilm models
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683356
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102035
work_keys_str_mv AT varinsimonjennifer comparisonoftwocutibacteriumacnesbiofilmmodels
AT lamretfabien comparisonoftwocutibacteriumacnesbiofilmmodels
AT colinmarius comparisonoftwocutibacteriumacnesbiofilmmodels
AT gangloffsophiec comparisonoftwocutibacteriumacnesbiofilmmodels
AT mongaretceline comparisonoftwocutibacteriumacnesbiofilmmodels
AT reffuveillefany comparisonoftwocutibacteriumacnesbiofilmmodels