Cargando…

The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of different conditions of simulated hydrostatic pulpal pressure on the μTBS of HEMA-based and HEMA-free dentin bonding agents (DBAs). The influence of dentin location (deep and superficial) on μTBS was also evaluated. Flat coronal dentin surface...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montanari, Marco, Fiorillo, Luca, Cervino, Gabriele, Sambataro, Sergio, Herford, Alan Scott, Cicciù, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8541316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206200
_version_ 1784589199910895616
author Montanari, Marco
Fiorillo, Luca
Cervino, Gabriele
Sambataro, Sergio
Herford, Alan Scott
Cicciù, Marco
author_facet Montanari, Marco
Fiorillo, Luca
Cervino, Gabriele
Sambataro, Sergio
Herford, Alan Scott
Cicciù, Marco
author_sort Montanari, Marco
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to examine the effect of different conditions of simulated hydrostatic pulpal pressure on the μTBS of HEMA-based and HEMA-free dentin bonding agents (DBAs). The influence of dentin location (deep and superficial) on μTBS was also evaluated. Flat coronal dentin surfaces of extracted human molars were prepared. Three groups of resin-bonded specimens were exposed to different pulpal pressures. Pulpal pressure was maintained for 20 min for each group. A flowable resin composite was used for coronal build-up. The bonded teeth were sectioned and, after 24 h of water storage, stressed to failure using the microtensile tester (μTBS). Failed samples were analyzed by SEM inspection. HEMA-based DBAs were much more sensitive to pulpal pressure conditions than non-HEMA-containing DBAs. Pulpal pressure had a greater influence in deep dentin. The HEMA-free DBA was insensitive to the presence or absence of pulpal pressure condition. SEM inspection confirmed a relationship between the presence of voids inside the HEMA-based DBAs layer and the lower μTBS results. HEMA-based DBAs are more sensitive to pulpal pressure conditions than HEMA-free DBAs. Interestingly, HEMA-free DBA showed a greater number of water droplets at resin–dentin interface in all tested conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8541316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85413162021-10-24 The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin Montanari, Marco Fiorillo, Luca Cervino, Gabriele Sambataro, Sergio Herford, Alan Scott Cicciù, Marco Materials (Basel) Article The objective of this study was to examine the effect of different conditions of simulated hydrostatic pulpal pressure on the μTBS of HEMA-based and HEMA-free dentin bonding agents (DBAs). The influence of dentin location (deep and superficial) on μTBS was also evaluated. Flat coronal dentin surfaces of extracted human molars were prepared. Three groups of resin-bonded specimens were exposed to different pulpal pressures. Pulpal pressure was maintained for 20 min for each group. A flowable resin composite was used for coronal build-up. The bonded teeth were sectioned and, after 24 h of water storage, stressed to failure using the microtensile tester (μTBS). Failed samples were analyzed by SEM inspection. HEMA-based DBAs were much more sensitive to pulpal pressure conditions than non-HEMA-containing DBAs. Pulpal pressure had a greater influence in deep dentin. The HEMA-free DBA was insensitive to the presence or absence of pulpal pressure condition. SEM inspection confirmed a relationship between the presence of voids inside the HEMA-based DBAs layer and the lower μTBS results. HEMA-based DBAs are more sensitive to pulpal pressure conditions than HEMA-free DBAs. Interestingly, HEMA-free DBA showed a greater number of water droplets at resin–dentin interface in all tested conditions. MDPI 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8541316/ /pubmed/34683790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206200 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Montanari, Marco
Fiorillo, Luca
Cervino, Gabriele
Sambataro, Sergio
Herford, Alan Scott
Cicciù, Marco
The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin
title The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin
title_full The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin
title_short The Effect of Different Condition of Pulpal Pressure on Microtensile Bond Strength of Several Dentin Bonding Agents on Deep and Superficial Dentin
title_sort effect of different condition of pulpal pressure on microtensile bond strength of several dentin bonding agents on deep and superficial dentin
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8541316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14206200
work_keys_str_mv AT montanarimarco theeffectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT fiorilloluca theeffectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT cervinogabriele theeffectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT sambatarosergio theeffectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT herfordalanscott theeffectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT cicciumarco theeffectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT montanarimarco effectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT fiorilloluca effectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT cervinogabriele effectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT sambatarosergio effectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT herfordalanscott effectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin
AT cicciumarco effectofdifferentconditionofpulpalpressureonmicrotensilebondstrengthofseveraldentinbondingagentsondeepandsuperficialdentin