Cargando…

20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Inhibits Observation-Execution-Related Motor Cortex Excitability

The present study aimed to investigate the effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the primary motor cortex (M1) during action observation, and subsequent action execution, on motor cortex excitability. The participants received tACS at 10 Hz or 20 Hz, or a sham stimulation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lijuan, Nitsche, Michael A., Zschorlich, Volker R., Liu, Hui, Kong, Zhaowei, Qi, Fengxue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8541383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11100979
_version_ 1784589216593739776
author Wang, Lijuan
Nitsche, Michael A.
Zschorlich, Volker R.
Liu, Hui
Kong, Zhaowei
Qi, Fengxue
author_facet Wang, Lijuan
Nitsche, Michael A.
Zschorlich, Volker R.
Liu, Hui
Kong, Zhaowei
Qi, Fengxue
author_sort Wang, Lijuan
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to investigate the effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the primary motor cortex (M1) during action observation, and subsequent action execution, on motor cortex excitability. The participants received tACS at 10 Hz or 20 Hz, or a sham stimulation over the left M1 for 10 min while they observed a video displaying a repeated button-tapping task using the right hand, and then performed an identical task with their right hand. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured before (T0) and after the action observation paired with tACS or a sham stimulation (T1), and after the performance of the action (T2). The results showed that MEPs were significantly reduced at time point T1 (p = 0.042, Cohen’s d = 0.611) and T2 (p = 0.0003, Cohen’s d = 0.852) in the 20 Hz tACS condition, in contrast with the sham stimulation. There was a significantly smaller MEP amplitude at time point T2 in the 20 Hz tACS condition, as compared to the 10 Hz tACS condition (p = 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.622), but the MEP amplitude did not significantly change at time point T1 between the 20 Hz and 10 Hz tACS conditions (p = 0.136, Cohen’s d = 0.536). There were no significant differences at time point T1 and T2 between the 10 Hz tACS condition and the sham stimulation. We conclude that 20 Hz tACS during action observation inhibited motor cortex excitability and subsequently inhibited execution-related motor cortex excitability. The effects of tACS on task-related motor cortex excitability are frequency-dependent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8541383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85413832021-10-24 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Inhibits Observation-Execution-Related Motor Cortex Excitability Wang, Lijuan Nitsche, Michael A. Zschorlich, Volker R. Liu, Hui Kong, Zhaowei Qi, Fengxue J Pers Med Communication The present study aimed to investigate the effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the primary motor cortex (M1) during action observation, and subsequent action execution, on motor cortex excitability. The participants received tACS at 10 Hz or 20 Hz, or a sham stimulation over the left M1 for 10 min while they observed a video displaying a repeated button-tapping task using the right hand, and then performed an identical task with their right hand. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured before (T0) and after the action observation paired with tACS or a sham stimulation (T1), and after the performance of the action (T2). The results showed that MEPs were significantly reduced at time point T1 (p = 0.042, Cohen’s d = 0.611) and T2 (p = 0.0003, Cohen’s d = 0.852) in the 20 Hz tACS condition, in contrast with the sham stimulation. There was a significantly smaller MEP amplitude at time point T2 in the 20 Hz tACS condition, as compared to the 10 Hz tACS condition (p = 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.622), but the MEP amplitude did not significantly change at time point T1 between the 20 Hz and 10 Hz tACS conditions (p = 0.136, Cohen’s d = 0.536). There were no significant differences at time point T1 and T2 between the 10 Hz tACS condition and the sham stimulation. We conclude that 20 Hz tACS during action observation inhibited motor cortex excitability and subsequently inhibited execution-related motor cortex excitability. The effects of tACS on task-related motor cortex excitability are frequency-dependent. MDPI 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8541383/ /pubmed/34683120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11100979 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Wang, Lijuan
Nitsche, Michael A.
Zschorlich, Volker R.
Liu, Hui
Kong, Zhaowei
Qi, Fengxue
20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Inhibits Observation-Execution-Related Motor Cortex Excitability
title 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Inhibits Observation-Execution-Related Motor Cortex Excitability
title_full 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Inhibits Observation-Execution-Related Motor Cortex Excitability
title_fullStr 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Inhibits Observation-Execution-Related Motor Cortex Excitability
title_full_unstemmed 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Inhibits Observation-Execution-Related Motor Cortex Excitability
title_short 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Inhibits Observation-Execution-Related Motor Cortex Excitability
title_sort 20 hz transcranial alternating current stimulation inhibits observation-execution-related motor cortex excitability
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8541383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34683120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11100979
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglijuan 20hztranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationinhibitsobservationexecutionrelatedmotorcortexexcitability
AT nitschemichaela 20hztranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationinhibitsobservationexecutionrelatedmotorcortexexcitability
AT zschorlichvolkerr 20hztranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationinhibitsobservationexecutionrelatedmotorcortexexcitability
AT liuhui 20hztranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationinhibitsobservationexecutionrelatedmotorcortexexcitability
AT kongzhaowei 20hztranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationinhibitsobservationexecutionrelatedmotorcortexexcitability
AT qifengxue 20hztranscranialalternatingcurrentstimulationinhibitsobservationexecutionrelatedmotorcortexexcitability