Cargando…

Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes

Current developments towards multipin, dry electrodes in electroencephalography (EEG) are promising for applications in non-laboratory environments. Dry electrodes do not require the application of conductive gel, which mostly confines the use of gel EEG systems to the laboratory environment. The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heijs, Janne J.A., Havelaar, Ruben Jan, Fiedler, Patrique, van Wezel, Richard J.A., Heida, Tjitske
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8541549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206827
_version_ 1784589257743007744
author Heijs, Janne J.A.
Havelaar, Ruben Jan
Fiedler, Patrique
van Wezel, Richard J.A.
Heida, Tjitske
author_facet Heijs, Janne J.A.
Havelaar, Ruben Jan
Fiedler, Patrique
van Wezel, Richard J.A.
Heida, Tjitske
author_sort Heijs, Janne J.A.
collection PubMed
description Current developments towards multipin, dry electrodes in electroencephalography (EEG) are promising for applications in non-laboratory environments. Dry electrodes do not require the application of conductive gel, which mostly confines the use of gel EEG systems to the laboratory environment. The aim of this study is to validate soft, multipin, dry EEG electrodes by comparing their performance to conventional gel EEG electrodes. Fifteen healthy volunteers performed three tasks, with a 32-channel gel EEG system and a 32-channel dry EEG system: the 40 Hz Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR), the checkerboard paradigm, and an eyes open/closed task. Within-subject analyses were performed to compare the signal quality in the time, frequency, and spatial domains. The results showed strong similarities between the two systems in the time and frequency domains, with strong correlations of the visual (ρ = 0.89) and auditory evoked potential (ρ = 0.81), and moderate to strong correlations for the alpha band during eye closure (ρ = 0.81–0.86) and the 40 Hz-ASSR power (ρ = 0.66–0.72), respectively. However, delta and theta band power was significantly increased, and the signal-to-noise ratio was significantly decreased for the dry EEG system. Topographical distributions were comparable for both systems. Moreover, the application time of the dry EEG system was significantly shorter (8 min). It can be concluded that the soft, multipin dry EEG system can be used in brain activity research with similar accuracy as conventional gel electrodes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8541549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85415492021-10-24 Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes Heijs, Janne J.A. Havelaar, Ruben Jan Fiedler, Patrique van Wezel, Richard J.A. Heida, Tjitske Sensors (Basel) Article Current developments towards multipin, dry electrodes in electroencephalography (EEG) are promising for applications in non-laboratory environments. Dry electrodes do not require the application of conductive gel, which mostly confines the use of gel EEG systems to the laboratory environment. The aim of this study is to validate soft, multipin, dry EEG electrodes by comparing their performance to conventional gel EEG electrodes. Fifteen healthy volunteers performed three tasks, with a 32-channel gel EEG system and a 32-channel dry EEG system: the 40 Hz Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR), the checkerboard paradigm, and an eyes open/closed task. Within-subject analyses were performed to compare the signal quality in the time, frequency, and spatial domains. The results showed strong similarities between the two systems in the time and frequency domains, with strong correlations of the visual (ρ = 0.89) and auditory evoked potential (ρ = 0.81), and moderate to strong correlations for the alpha band during eye closure (ρ = 0.81–0.86) and the 40 Hz-ASSR power (ρ = 0.66–0.72), respectively. However, delta and theta band power was significantly increased, and the signal-to-noise ratio was significantly decreased for the dry EEG system. Topographical distributions were comparable for both systems. Moreover, the application time of the dry EEG system was significantly shorter (8 min). It can be concluded that the soft, multipin dry EEG system can be used in brain activity research with similar accuracy as conventional gel electrodes. MDPI 2021-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8541549/ /pubmed/34696039 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206827 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Heijs, Janne J.A.
Havelaar, Ruben Jan
Fiedler, Patrique
van Wezel, Richard J.A.
Heida, Tjitske
Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes
title Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes
title_full Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes
title_fullStr Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes
title_short Validation of Soft Multipin Dry EEG Electrodes
title_sort validation of soft multipin dry eeg electrodes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8541549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696039
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21206827
work_keys_str_mv AT heijsjanneja validationofsoftmultipindryeegelectrodes
AT havelaarrubenjan validationofsoftmultipindryeegelectrodes
AT fiedlerpatrique validationofsoftmultipindryeegelectrodes
AT vanwezelrichardja validationofsoftmultipindryeegelectrodes
AT heidatjitske validationofsoftmultipindryeegelectrodes