Cargando…
The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to modify a speech perception in noise test to assess whether the presence of another individual (copresence), relative to being alone, affected listening performance and effort expenditure. Furthermore, this study assessed if the effect of the other individual’...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33795615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001046 |
_version_ | 1784589366508650496 |
---|---|
author | Pielage, Hidde Zekveld, Adriana A. Saunders, Gabrielle H. Versfeld, Niek J. Lunner, Thomas Kramer, Sophia E. |
author_facet | Pielage, Hidde Zekveld, Adriana A. Saunders, Gabrielle H. Versfeld, Niek J. Lunner, Thomas Kramer, Sophia E. |
author_sort | Pielage, Hidde |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to modify a speech perception in noise test to assess whether the presence of another individual (copresence), relative to being alone, affected listening performance and effort expenditure. Furthermore, this study assessed if the effect of the other individual’s presence on listening effort was influenced by the difficulty of the task and whether participants had to repeat the sentences they listened to or not. DESIGN: Thirty-four young, normal-hearing participants (mean age: 24.7 years) listened to spoken Dutch sentences that were masked with a stationary noise masker and presented through a loudspeaker. The participants alternated between repeating sentences (active condition) and not repeating sentences (passive condition). They did this either alone or together with another participant in the booth. When together, participants took turns repeating sentences. The speech-in-noise test was performed adaptively at three intelligibility levels (20%, 50%, and 80% sentences correct) in a block-wise fashion. During testing, pupil size was recorded as an objective outcome measure of listening effort. RESULTS: Lower speech intelligibility levels were associated with increased peak pupil dilation (PPDs) and doing the task in the presence of another individual (compared with doing it alone) significantly increased PPD. No interaction effect between intelligibility and copresence on PPD was found. The results suggested that the change of PPD between doing the task alone or together was especially apparent for people who started the experiment in the presence of another individual. Furthermore, PPD was significantly lower during passive listening, compared with active listening. Finally, it seemed that performance was unaffected by copresence. CONCLUSION: The increased PPDs during listening in the presence of another participant suggest that more effort was invested during the task. However, it seems that the additional effort did not result in a change of performance. This study showed that at least one aspect of the social context of a listening situation (in this case copresence) can affect listening effort, indicating that social context might be important to consider in future cognitive hearing research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8542087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85420872021-10-27 The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance Pielage, Hidde Zekveld, Adriana A. Saunders, Gabrielle H. Versfeld, Niek J. Lunner, Thomas Kramer, Sophia E. Ear Hear Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to modify a speech perception in noise test to assess whether the presence of another individual (copresence), relative to being alone, affected listening performance and effort expenditure. Furthermore, this study assessed if the effect of the other individual’s presence on listening effort was influenced by the difficulty of the task and whether participants had to repeat the sentences they listened to or not. DESIGN: Thirty-four young, normal-hearing participants (mean age: 24.7 years) listened to spoken Dutch sentences that were masked with a stationary noise masker and presented through a loudspeaker. The participants alternated between repeating sentences (active condition) and not repeating sentences (passive condition). They did this either alone or together with another participant in the booth. When together, participants took turns repeating sentences. The speech-in-noise test was performed adaptively at three intelligibility levels (20%, 50%, and 80% sentences correct) in a block-wise fashion. During testing, pupil size was recorded as an objective outcome measure of listening effort. RESULTS: Lower speech intelligibility levels were associated with increased peak pupil dilation (PPDs) and doing the task in the presence of another individual (compared with doing it alone) significantly increased PPD. No interaction effect between intelligibility and copresence on PPD was found. The results suggested that the change of PPD between doing the task alone or together was especially apparent for people who started the experiment in the presence of another individual. Furthermore, PPD was significantly lower during passive listening, compared with active listening. Finally, it seemed that performance was unaffected by copresence. CONCLUSION: The increased PPDs during listening in the presence of another participant suggest that more effort was invested during the task. However, it seems that the additional effort did not result in a change of performance. This study showed that at least one aspect of the social context of a listening situation (in this case copresence) can affect listening effort, indicating that social context might be important to consider in future cognitive hearing research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8542087/ /pubmed/33795615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001046 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pielage, Hidde Zekveld, Adriana A. Saunders, Gabrielle H. Versfeld, Niek J. Lunner, Thomas Kramer, Sophia E. The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance |
title | The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance |
title_full | The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance |
title_fullStr | The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance |
title_short | The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance |
title_sort | presence of another individual influences listening effort, but not performance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33795615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pielagehidde thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT zekveldadrianaa thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT saundersgabrielleh thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT versfeldniekj thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT lunnerthomas thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT kramersophiae thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT pielagehidde presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT zekveldadrianaa presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT saundersgabrielleh presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT versfeldniekj presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT lunnerthomas presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance AT kramersophiae presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance |