Cargando…

The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to modify a speech perception in noise test to assess whether the presence of another individual (copresence), relative to being alone, affected listening performance and effort expenditure. Furthermore, this study assessed if the effect of the other individual’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pielage, Hidde, Zekveld, Adriana A., Saunders, Gabrielle H., Versfeld, Niek J., Lunner, Thomas, Kramer, Sophia E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33795615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001046
_version_ 1784589366508650496
author Pielage, Hidde
Zekveld, Adriana A.
Saunders, Gabrielle H.
Versfeld, Niek J.
Lunner, Thomas
Kramer, Sophia E.
author_facet Pielage, Hidde
Zekveld, Adriana A.
Saunders, Gabrielle H.
Versfeld, Niek J.
Lunner, Thomas
Kramer, Sophia E.
author_sort Pielage, Hidde
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to modify a speech perception in noise test to assess whether the presence of another individual (copresence), relative to being alone, affected listening performance and effort expenditure. Furthermore, this study assessed if the effect of the other individual’s presence on listening effort was influenced by the difficulty of the task and whether participants had to repeat the sentences they listened to or not. DESIGN: Thirty-four young, normal-hearing participants (mean age: 24.7 years) listened to spoken Dutch sentences that were masked with a stationary noise masker and presented through a loudspeaker. The participants alternated between repeating sentences (active condition) and not repeating sentences (passive condition). They did this either alone or together with another participant in the booth. When together, participants took turns repeating sentences. The speech-in-noise test was performed adaptively at three intelligibility levels (20%, 50%, and 80% sentences correct) in a block-wise fashion. During testing, pupil size was recorded as an objective outcome measure of listening effort. RESULTS: Lower speech intelligibility levels were associated with increased peak pupil dilation (PPDs) and doing the task in the presence of another individual (compared with doing it alone) significantly increased PPD. No interaction effect between intelligibility and copresence on PPD was found. The results suggested that the change of PPD between doing the task alone or together was especially apparent for people who started the experiment in the presence of another individual. Furthermore, PPD was significantly lower during passive listening, compared with active listening. Finally, it seemed that performance was unaffected by copresence. CONCLUSION: The increased PPDs during listening in the presence of another participant suggest that more effort was invested during the task. However, it seems that the additional effort did not result in a change of performance. This study showed that at least one aspect of the social context of a listening situation (in this case copresence) can affect listening effort, indicating that social context might be important to consider in future cognitive hearing research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8542087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85420872021-10-27 The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance Pielage, Hidde Zekveld, Adriana A. Saunders, Gabrielle H. Versfeld, Niek J. Lunner, Thomas Kramer, Sophia E. Ear Hear Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to modify a speech perception in noise test to assess whether the presence of another individual (copresence), relative to being alone, affected listening performance and effort expenditure. Furthermore, this study assessed if the effect of the other individual’s presence on listening effort was influenced by the difficulty of the task and whether participants had to repeat the sentences they listened to or not. DESIGN: Thirty-four young, normal-hearing participants (mean age: 24.7 years) listened to spoken Dutch sentences that were masked with a stationary noise masker and presented through a loudspeaker. The participants alternated between repeating sentences (active condition) and not repeating sentences (passive condition). They did this either alone or together with another participant in the booth. When together, participants took turns repeating sentences. The speech-in-noise test was performed adaptively at three intelligibility levels (20%, 50%, and 80% sentences correct) in a block-wise fashion. During testing, pupil size was recorded as an objective outcome measure of listening effort. RESULTS: Lower speech intelligibility levels were associated with increased peak pupil dilation (PPDs) and doing the task in the presence of another individual (compared with doing it alone) significantly increased PPD. No interaction effect between intelligibility and copresence on PPD was found. The results suggested that the change of PPD between doing the task alone or together was especially apparent for people who started the experiment in the presence of another individual. Furthermore, PPD was significantly lower during passive listening, compared with active listening. Finally, it seemed that performance was unaffected by copresence. CONCLUSION: The increased PPDs during listening in the presence of another participant suggest that more effort was invested during the task. However, it seems that the additional effort did not result in a change of performance. This study showed that at least one aspect of the social context of a listening situation (in this case copresence) can affect listening effort, indicating that social context might be important to consider in future cognitive hearing research. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8542087/ /pubmed/33795615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001046 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pielage, Hidde
Zekveld, Adriana A.
Saunders, Gabrielle H.
Versfeld, Niek J.
Lunner, Thomas
Kramer, Sophia E.
The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance
title The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance
title_full The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance
title_fullStr The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance
title_full_unstemmed The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance
title_short The Presence of Another Individual Influences Listening Effort, But Not Performance
title_sort presence of another individual influences listening effort, but not performance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33795615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001046
work_keys_str_mv AT pielagehidde thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT zekveldadrianaa thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT saundersgabrielleh thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT versfeldniekj thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT lunnerthomas thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT kramersophiae thepresenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT pielagehidde presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT zekveldadrianaa presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT saundersgabrielleh presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT versfeldniekj presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT lunnerthomas presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance
AT kramersophiae presenceofanotherindividualinfluenceslisteningeffortbutnotperformance