Cargando…

Clinical Outcome of Nerve Decompression Surgery for Migraine Improves with Nerve Wrap

BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine headaches affect nearly 30 million Americans every year and are responsible for roughly 1.2 million emergency department visits annually. Many of the standard therapies commonly used to treat migraines are often unsuccessful and may furthermore introduce unwanted side ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alizadeh, Kaveh, Kreinces, Jason B., Smiley, Abbas, Gachabayov, Mahir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003886
_version_ 1784589379156574208
author Alizadeh, Kaveh
Kreinces, Jason B.
Smiley, Abbas
Gachabayov, Mahir
author_facet Alizadeh, Kaveh
Kreinces, Jason B.
Smiley, Abbas
Gachabayov, Mahir
author_sort Alizadeh, Kaveh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine headaches affect nearly 30 million Americans every year and are responsible for roughly 1.2 million emergency department visits annually. Many of the standard therapies commonly used to treat migraines are often unsuccessful and may furthermore introduce unwanted side effects. The purpose of this study was to identify independent predictors of clinical improvement in patients undergoing surgical nerve decompression for migraine. METHODS: A retrospective chart review between 2010 and 2020 was conducted. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement at 1-year follow-up, defined as an independence from prescription medications. Patients were stratified into two groups: clinical improvement and treatment failure. Backward multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations between migraine improvement and different patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included. In total, 129 (84.3%) patients improved and 24 (15.7%) did not. Significant associations with clinical improvement at multivariable logistic regression were found with acellular dermal matrix nerve wrap (OR = 10.80, 95%CI: 6.18–16.27), and operation of trigger sites four (OR = 37.96, 95%CI: 2.16–73.10) and five (OR = 159, 95%CI: 10–299). CONCLUSION: The use of acellular dermal matrix nerve wraps in surgery was significantly associated with clinical migraine improvement, as was operation at trigger sites four and five.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8542141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85421412021-10-25 Clinical Outcome of Nerve Decompression Surgery for Migraine Improves with Nerve Wrap Alizadeh, Kaveh Kreinces, Jason B. Smiley, Abbas Gachabayov, Mahir Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Hand/Peripheral Nerve BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine headaches affect nearly 30 million Americans every year and are responsible for roughly 1.2 million emergency department visits annually. Many of the standard therapies commonly used to treat migraines are often unsuccessful and may furthermore introduce unwanted side effects. The purpose of this study was to identify independent predictors of clinical improvement in patients undergoing surgical nerve decompression for migraine. METHODS: A retrospective chart review between 2010 and 2020 was conducted. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement at 1-year follow-up, defined as an independence from prescription medications. Patients were stratified into two groups: clinical improvement and treatment failure. Backward multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the associations between migraine improvement and different patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were included. In total, 129 (84.3%) patients improved and 24 (15.7%) did not. Significant associations with clinical improvement at multivariable logistic regression were found with acellular dermal matrix nerve wrap (OR = 10.80, 95%CI: 6.18–16.27), and operation of trigger sites four (OR = 37.96, 95%CI: 2.16–73.10) and five (OR = 159, 95%CI: 10–299). CONCLUSION: The use of acellular dermal matrix nerve wraps in surgery was significantly associated with clinical migraine improvement, as was operation at trigger sites four and five. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8542141/ /pubmed/34703716 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003886 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Hand/Peripheral Nerve
Alizadeh, Kaveh
Kreinces, Jason B.
Smiley, Abbas
Gachabayov, Mahir
Clinical Outcome of Nerve Decompression Surgery for Migraine Improves with Nerve Wrap
title Clinical Outcome of Nerve Decompression Surgery for Migraine Improves with Nerve Wrap
title_full Clinical Outcome of Nerve Decompression Surgery for Migraine Improves with Nerve Wrap
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome of Nerve Decompression Surgery for Migraine Improves with Nerve Wrap
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome of Nerve Decompression Surgery for Migraine Improves with Nerve Wrap
title_short Clinical Outcome of Nerve Decompression Surgery for Migraine Improves with Nerve Wrap
title_sort clinical outcome of nerve decompression surgery for migraine improves with nerve wrap
topic Hand/Peripheral Nerve
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34703716
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003886
work_keys_str_mv AT alizadehkaveh clinicaloutcomeofnervedecompressionsurgeryformigraineimproveswithnervewrap
AT kreincesjasonb clinicaloutcomeofnervedecompressionsurgeryformigraineimproveswithnervewrap
AT smileyabbas clinicaloutcomeofnervedecompressionsurgeryformigraineimproveswithnervewrap
AT gachabayovmahir clinicaloutcomeofnervedecompressionsurgeryformigraineimproveswithnervewrap