Cargando…

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

PURPOSE: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely used for pulmonary infection; nonetheless, the experience from its clinical use in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections is sparse. This study aimed to compare mNGS results from lung biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Lei, Song, Junxiu, Wang, Yubao, Feng, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34707378
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S333818
_version_ 1784589461243297792
author Yang, Lei
Song, Junxiu
Wang, Yubao
Feng, Jing
author_facet Yang, Lei
Song, Junxiu
Wang, Yubao
Feng, Jing
author_sort Yang, Lei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely used for pulmonary infection; nonetheless, the experience from its clinical use in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections is sparse. This study aimed to compare mNGS results from lung biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and determine their clinical diagnostic efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 106 patients with suspected pulmonary fungal infection from May 2018 to January 2020 were included in this retrospective study. All patients’ lung biopsy and BALF specimens were collected through bronchoscopy. Overall, 45 (42.5%) patients had pulmonary fungal infection. The performance of lung biopsy and BALF used for mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections and identifying pathogens was compared. Additionally, mNGS was compared with conventional tests (pathology, galactomannan test, and cultures) with respect to the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections. RESULTS: Lung biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS exhibited no difference in terms of sensitivity (80.0% vs 84.4%, P=0.754) and specificity (91.8% vs 85.3%, P=0.39). Additionally, there was no difference in specificity between mNGS and conventional tests; however, the sensitivity of mNGS (lung biopsy, BALF) in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections was significantly higher than that of conventional tests (conventional tests vs biopsy-mNGS: 44.4% vs 80.0%, P<0.05; conventional tests vs BALF-mNGS: 44.4% vs 84.4%, P<0.05). Among 32 patients with positive mNGS results for both biopsy and BALF specimens, 23 (71.9%) cases of consistency between the two tests for the detected fungi and nine (28.1%) cases of a partial match were identified. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve for the combination of biopsy and BALF was significantly higher than that for BALF-mNGS (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: We recommend biopsy-based or BALF-based mNGS for diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections because of their diagnostic advantages over conventional tests. The combination of biopsy and BALF for mNGS can be considered when higher diagnostic efficacy is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8542593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85425932021-10-26 Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Yang, Lei Song, Junxiu Wang, Yubao Feng, Jing Infect Drug Resist Original Research PURPOSE: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely used for pulmonary infection; nonetheless, the experience from its clinical use in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections is sparse. This study aimed to compare mNGS results from lung biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and determine their clinical diagnostic efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 106 patients with suspected pulmonary fungal infection from May 2018 to January 2020 were included in this retrospective study. All patients’ lung biopsy and BALF specimens were collected through bronchoscopy. Overall, 45 (42.5%) patients had pulmonary fungal infection. The performance of lung biopsy and BALF used for mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections and identifying pathogens was compared. Additionally, mNGS was compared with conventional tests (pathology, galactomannan test, and cultures) with respect to the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections. RESULTS: Lung biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS exhibited no difference in terms of sensitivity (80.0% vs 84.4%, P=0.754) and specificity (91.8% vs 85.3%, P=0.39). Additionally, there was no difference in specificity between mNGS and conventional tests; however, the sensitivity of mNGS (lung biopsy, BALF) in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections was significantly higher than that of conventional tests (conventional tests vs biopsy-mNGS: 44.4% vs 80.0%, P<0.05; conventional tests vs BALF-mNGS: 44.4% vs 84.4%, P<0.05). Among 32 patients with positive mNGS results for both biopsy and BALF specimens, 23 (71.9%) cases of consistency between the two tests for the detected fungi and nine (28.1%) cases of a partial match were identified. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve for the combination of biopsy and BALF was significantly higher than that for BALF-mNGS (P=0.018). CONCLUSION: We recommend biopsy-based or BALF-based mNGS for diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections because of their diagnostic advantages over conventional tests. The combination of biopsy and BALF for mNGS can be considered when higher diagnostic efficacy is required. Dove 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8542593/ /pubmed/34707378 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S333818 Text en © 2021 Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Yang, Lei
Song, Junxiu
Wang, Yubao
Feng, Jing
Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
title Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
title_full Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
title_fullStr Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
title_full_unstemmed Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
title_short Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
title_sort metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pulmonary fungal infection diagnosis: lung biopsy versus bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34707378
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S333818
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglei metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingforpulmonaryfungalinfectiondiagnosislungbiopsyversusbronchoalveolarlavagefluid
AT songjunxiu metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingforpulmonaryfungalinfectiondiagnosislungbiopsyversusbronchoalveolarlavagefluid
AT wangyubao metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingforpulmonaryfungalinfectiondiagnosislungbiopsyversusbronchoalveolarlavagefluid
AT fengjing metagenomicnextgenerationsequencingforpulmonaryfungalinfectiondiagnosislungbiopsyversusbronchoalveolarlavagefluid