Cargando…

COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study

PURPOSE: Many countries worldwide have taken early measures to combat the spread of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 by implementing social distancing measures. The main aim of the present work is to examine the feasibility of social distancing (i.e. 1.5 m) in closed spaces taking into account the possibility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarhan, A. R., Naser, P., Naser, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00748-0
_version_ 1784589464406851584
author Sarhan, A. R.
Naser, P.
Naser, J.
author_facet Sarhan, A. R.
Naser, P.
Naser, J.
author_sort Sarhan, A. R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Many countries worldwide have taken early measures to combat the spread of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 by implementing social distancing measures. The main aim of the present work is to examine the feasibility of social distancing (i.e. 1.5 m) in closed spaces taking into account the possibility for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: A 3D numerical model of human respiration activities, such as breathing and speaking within indoor environments has been simulated with CFD software AVL FIRE R2020. The Eulerian-Eulerian flow model coupled with k-Ɛ approach were employed. With regard to breathing mode, the infected individual is modelled to be breathing 10 times per minute with a pulmonary rate of 6 L/min with a sinusoidal cycle. The present investigation considered air and droplets/particles as separate phases. RESULTS: The predicted results suggested that the social distancing (i.e. 1.5 m) is not adequate to reduce the risk of contracting diseases like COVID-19, especially when staying for a longer period in an indoor environment. The person directly facing the infected person inhaled more than 1000 aerosol droplets within 30 min. The results also showed approximately 65 % decrease in the number of inhaled droplets the room is well ventilated. CONCLUSIONS: Within an indoor environment, 1.5 m distance will not be enough to protect the healthy individuals from the droplets coming from an infected person. Also, the situation may become worse with the change of the air ventilation system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8542656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85426562021-10-25 COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study Sarhan, A. R. Naser, P. Naser, J. J Environ Health Sci Eng Research Article PURPOSE: Many countries worldwide have taken early measures to combat the spread of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 by implementing social distancing measures. The main aim of the present work is to examine the feasibility of social distancing (i.e. 1.5 m) in closed spaces taking into account the possibility for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: A 3D numerical model of human respiration activities, such as breathing and speaking within indoor environments has been simulated with CFD software AVL FIRE R2020. The Eulerian-Eulerian flow model coupled with k-Ɛ approach were employed. With regard to breathing mode, the infected individual is modelled to be breathing 10 times per minute with a pulmonary rate of 6 L/min with a sinusoidal cycle. The present investigation considered air and droplets/particles as separate phases. RESULTS: The predicted results suggested that the social distancing (i.e. 1.5 m) is not adequate to reduce the risk of contracting diseases like COVID-19, especially when staying for a longer period in an indoor environment. The person directly facing the infected person inhaled more than 1000 aerosol droplets within 30 min. The results also showed approximately 65 % decrease in the number of inhaled droplets the room is well ventilated. CONCLUSIONS: Within an indoor environment, 1.5 m distance will not be enough to protect the healthy individuals from the droplets coming from an infected person. Also, the situation may become worse with the change of the air ventilation system. Springer International Publishing 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8542656/ /pubmed/34721881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00748-0 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
spellingShingle Research Article
Sarhan, A. R.
Naser, P.
Naser, J.
COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study
title COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study
title_full COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study
title_fullStr COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study
title_short COVID-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study
title_sort covid-19 aerodynamic evaluation of social distancing in indoor environments, a numerical study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34721881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00748-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sarhanar covid19aerodynamicevaluationofsocialdistancinginindoorenvironmentsanumericalstudy
AT naserp covid19aerodynamicevaluationofsocialdistancinginindoorenvironmentsanumericalstudy
AT naserj covid19aerodynamicevaluationofsocialdistancinginindoorenvironmentsanumericalstudy