Cargando…

Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND: The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a condition with a high mortality and morbidity. Mechanical ventilation prevents immediate mortality but may further damage patients’ lungs. Low tidal volume lung-protective strategies have been shown to increase survival by reducing this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poole, J., McDowell, C., Lall, R., Perkins, G., McAuley, D., Gao, F., Young, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28403395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew465
_version_ 1784589523841187840
author Poole, J.
McDowell, C.
Lall, R.
Perkins, G.
McAuley, D.
Gao, F.
Young, D.
author_facet Poole, J.
McDowell, C.
Lall, R.
Perkins, G.
McAuley, D.
Gao, F.
Young, D.
author_sort Poole, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a condition with a high mortality and morbidity. Mechanical ventilation prevents immediate mortality but may further damage patients’ lungs. Low tidal volume lung-protective strategies have been shown to increase survival by reducing this iatrogenic damage. Current guidelines recommend tidal volumes of 6–8 ml kg(−1) of predicted body weight. We used data from three large randomized controlled trials of treatments for ARDS to determine compliance with these recommendations. METHODS: We used the tidal volume recorded at randomization for all patients in the OSCAR, HARP-2, and BALTI-2 studies. In addition, we used the ventilation data for control arm patients in OSCAR and all patients in HARP-2 at days 1 and 7 after randomization. RESULTS: The three trials enrolled 1660 patients, with tidal volume data available at least at one time point in 1412 patients. Compliance with the 6–8 ml kg(−1) recommendation for tidal volume ranged from 20 to 39% of patients across all time points in all three trials. CONCLUSION: Poor compliance with the guidelines for tidal volume in patients with ARDS has been demonstrated before in case series, but not in clinical trials where the patient population is specifically selected against standard ARDS diagnostic criteria and the investigators were encouraged to use low tidal volumes. This study may indicate a need to improve implementation and compliance with protective lung ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8542892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85428922021-10-25 Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome Poole, J. McDowell, C. Lall, R. Perkins, G. McAuley, D. Gao, F. Young, D. Br J Anaesth Critical Care BACKGROUND: The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a condition with a high mortality and morbidity. Mechanical ventilation prevents immediate mortality but may further damage patients’ lungs. Low tidal volume lung-protective strategies have been shown to increase survival by reducing this iatrogenic damage. Current guidelines recommend tidal volumes of 6–8 ml kg(−1) of predicted body weight. We used data from three large randomized controlled trials of treatments for ARDS to determine compliance with these recommendations. METHODS: We used the tidal volume recorded at randomization for all patients in the OSCAR, HARP-2, and BALTI-2 studies. In addition, we used the ventilation data for control arm patients in OSCAR and all patients in HARP-2 at days 1 and 7 after randomization. RESULTS: The three trials enrolled 1660 patients, with tidal volume data available at least at one time point in 1412 patients. Compliance with the 6–8 ml kg(−1) recommendation for tidal volume ranged from 20 to 39% of patients across all time points in all three trials. CONCLUSION: Poor compliance with the guidelines for tidal volume in patients with ARDS has been demonstrated before in case series, but not in clinical trials where the patient population is specifically selected against standard ARDS diagnostic criteria and the investigators were encouraged to use low tidal volumes. This study may indicate a need to improve implementation and compliance with protective lung ventilation. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2017-04 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8542892/ /pubmed/28403395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew465 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Critical Care
Poole, J.
McDowell, C.
Lall, R.
Perkins, G.
McAuley, D.
Gao, F.
Young, D.
Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
title Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_fullStr Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_short Individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
title_sort individual patient data analysis of tidal volumes used in three large randomized control trials involving patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
topic Critical Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28403395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew465
work_keys_str_mv AT poolej individualpatientdataanalysisoftidalvolumesusedinthreelargerandomizedcontroltrialsinvolvingpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT mcdowellc individualpatientdataanalysisoftidalvolumesusedinthreelargerandomizedcontroltrialsinvolvingpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT lallr individualpatientdataanalysisoftidalvolumesusedinthreelargerandomizedcontroltrialsinvolvingpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT perkinsg individualpatientdataanalysisoftidalvolumesusedinthreelargerandomizedcontroltrialsinvolvingpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT mcauleyd individualpatientdataanalysisoftidalvolumesusedinthreelargerandomizedcontroltrialsinvolvingpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT gaof individualpatientdataanalysisoftidalvolumesusedinthreelargerandomizedcontroltrialsinvolvingpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome
AT youngd individualpatientdataanalysisoftidalvolumesusedinthreelargerandomizedcontroltrialsinvolvingpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome