Cargando…

How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Improvements in primary care quality are often proposed as a solution to rises in emergency department (ED) attendances. However, there is little agreement on what constitutes an avoidable attendance, and the relationship between primary care quality and ED demand remains poorly understo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parkinson, Beth, Meacock, Rachel, Checkland, Kath, Sutton, Matt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011651
_version_ 1784589593229656064
author Parkinson, Beth
Meacock, Rachel
Checkland, Kath
Sutton, Matt
author_facet Parkinson, Beth
Meacock, Rachel
Checkland, Kath
Sutton, Matt
author_sort Parkinson, Beth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improvements in primary care quality are often proposed as a solution to rises in emergency department (ED) attendances. However, there is little agreement on what constitutes an avoidable attendance, and the relationship between primary care quality and ED demand remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the size of the associations between primary care quality and volumes of ED attendances classified as avoidable. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all attendances at EDs in England during 2015/2016, applying three definitions of avoidable attendance. We linked practice-level counts of attendances to seven measures of primary care access, patient experience and clinical quality for 7521 practices. We used count data regressions to associate attendance counts with levels of quality. We then calculated proportions of attendances associated with levels of primary care quality below the national average. RESULTS: Attendance volumes were negatively related to three of the seven quality measures. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for all attendances associated with 10 percentage-point differences in quality were 0.987 for clinical quality and 0.987 for easy telephone access and 0.978 for ability to get an appointment. These associations were relatively stronger for narrower definitions of avoidable attendances (for the narrowest definition, IRRs=0.966, 0.976 and 0.934, respectively) but represented fewer attendances in absolute terms. 341 000 (2.4%) attendances were associated with levels of primary care quality below the national average in 2015/2016. CONCLUSION: ED attendances are sensitive to primary care quality, but magnitudes of these associations are small. Attendances are much less responsive to differences in primary care quality than indicated by estimates of the prevalence of avoidable attendances. This may explain the failure of initiatives to reduce attendances through primary care improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8543208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85432082021-11-10 How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study Parkinson, Beth Meacock, Rachel Checkland, Kath Sutton, Matt BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Improvements in primary care quality are often proposed as a solution to rises in emergency department (ED) attendances. However, there is little agreement on what constitutes an avoidable attendance, and the relationship between primary care quality and ED demand remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the size of the associations between primary care quality and volumes of ED attendances classified as avoidable. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all attendances at EDs in England during 2015/2016, applying three definitions of avoidable attendance. We linked practice-level counts of attendances to seven measures of primary care access, patient experience and clinical quality for 7521 practices. We used count data regressions to associate attendance counts with levels of quality. We then calculated proportions of attendances associated with levels of primary care quality below the national average. RESULTS: Attendance volumes were negatively related to three of the seven quality measures. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for all attendances associated with 10 percentage-point differences in quality were 0.987 for clinical quality and 0.987 for easy telephone access and 0.978 for ability to get an appointment. These associations were relatively stronger for narrower definitions of avoidable attendances (for the narrowest definition, IRRs=0.966, 0.976 and 0.934, respectively) but represented fewer attendances in absolute terms. 341 000 (2.4%) attendances were associated with levels of primary care quality below the national average in 2015/2016. CONCLUSION: ED attendances are sensitive to primary care quality, but magnitudes of these associations are small. Attendances are much less responsive to differences in primary care quality than indicated by estimates of the prevalence of avoidable attendances. This may explain the failure of initiatives to reduce attendances through primary care improvements. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8543208/ /pubmed/33144351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011651 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Parkinson, Beth
Meacock, Rachel
Checkland, Kath
Sutton, Matt
How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study
title How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study
title_full How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study
title_fullStr How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study
title_short How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study
title_sort how sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? retrospective observational study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011651
work_keys_str_mv AT parkinsonbeth howsensitiveareavoidableemergencydepartmentattendancestoprimarycarequalityretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT meacockrachel howsensitiveareavoidableemergencydepartmentattendancestoprimarycarequalityretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT checklandkath howsensitiveareavoidableemergencydepartmentattendancestoprimarycarequalityretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT suttonmatt howsensitiveareavoidableemergencydepartmentattendancestoprimarycarequalityretrospectiveobservationalstudy