Cargando…
How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study
BACKGROUND: Improvements in primary care quality are often proposed as a solution to rises in emergency department (ED) attendances. However, there is little agreement on what constitutes an avoidable attendance, and the relationship between primary care quality and ED demand remains poorly understo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011651 |
_version_ | 1784589593229656064 |
---|---|
author | Parkinson, Beth Meacock, Rachel Checkland, Kath Sutton, Matt |
author_facet | Parkinson, Beth Meacock, Rachel Checkland, Kath Sutton, Matt |
author_sort | Parkinson, Beth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improvements in primary care quality are often proposed as a solution to rises in emergency department (ED) attendances. However, there is little agreement on what constitutes an avoidable attendance, and the relationship between primary care quality and ED demand remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the size of the associations between primary care quality and volumes of ED attendances classified as avoidable. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all attendances at EDs in England during 2015/2016, applying three definitions of avoidable attendance. We linked practice-level counts of attendances to seven measures of primary care access, patient experience and clinical quality for 7521 practices. We used count data regressions to associate attendance counts with levels of quality. We then calculated proportions of attendances associated with levels of primary care quality below the national average. RESULTS: Attendance volumes were negatively related to three of the seven quality measures. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for all attendances associated with 10 percentage-point differences in quality were 0.987 for clinical quality and 0.987 for easy telephone access and 0.978 for ability to get an appointment. These associations were relatively stronger for narrower definitions of avoidable attendances (for the narrowest definition, IRRs=0.966, 0.976 and 0.934, respectively) but represented fewer attendances in absolute terms. 341 000 (2.4%) attendances were associated with levels of primary care quality below the national average in 2015/2016. CONCLUSION: ED attendances are sensitive to primary care quality, but magnitudes of these associations are small. Attendances are much less responsive to differences in primary care quality than indicated by estimates of the prevalence of avoidable attendances. This may explain the failure of initiatives to reduce attendances through primary care improvements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8543208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85432082021-11-10 How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study Parkinson, Beth Meacock, Rachel Checkland, Kath Sutton, Matt BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Improvements in primary care quality are often proposed as a solution to rises in emergency department (ED) attendances. However, there is little agreement on what constitutes an avoidable attendance, and the relationship between primary care quality and ED demand remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the size of the associations between primary care quality and volumes of ED attendances classified as avoidable. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of all attendances at EDs in England during 2015/2016, applying three definitions of avoidable attendance. We linked practice-level counts of attendances to seven measures of primary care access, patient experience and clinical quality for 7521 practices. We used count data regressions to associate attendance counts with levels of quality. We then calculated proportions of attendances associated with levels of primary care quality below the national average. RESULTS: Attendance volumes were negatively related to three of the seven quality measures. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for all attendances associated with 10 percentage-point differences in quality were 0.987 for clinical quality and 0.987 for easy telephone access and 0.978 for ability to get an appointment. These associations were relatively stronger for narrower definitions of avoidable attendances (for the narrowest definition, IRRs=0.966, 0.976 and 0.934, respectively) but represented fewer attendances in absolute terms. 341 000 (2.4%) attendances were associated with levels of primary care quality below the national average in 2015/2016. CONCLUSION: ED attendances are sensitive to primary care quality, but magnitudes of these associations are small. Attendances are much less responsive to differences in primary care quality than indicated by estimates of the prevalence of avoidable attendances. This may explain the failure of initiatives to reduce attendances through primary care improvements. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11 2020-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8543208/ /pubmed/33144351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011651 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Parkinson, Beth Meacock, Rachel Checkland, Kath Sutton, Matt How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study |
title | How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study |
title_full | How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study |
title_fullStr | How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study |
title_short | How sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? Retrospective observational study |
title_sort | how sensitive are avoidable emergency department attendances to primary care quality? retrospective observational study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33144351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011651 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkinsonbeth howsensitiveareavoidableemergencydepartmentattendancestoprimarycarequalityretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT meacockrachel howsensitiveareavoidableemergencydepartmentattendancestoprimarycarequalityretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT checklandkath howsensitiveareavoidableemergencydepartmentattendancestoprimarycarequalityretrospectiveobservationalstudy AT suttonmatt howsensitiveareavoidableemergencydepartmentattendancestoprimarycarequalityretrospectiveobservationalstudy |