Cargando…

Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull

BACKGROUND: Polymeric sponge technique is recommended for developing the desired porosity of Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) which may favor bone regeneration. PURPOSE: To investigate the healing of BCP with ratio of HA30/β‐TCP70 (HA30) and HA70/β‐TCP30 (HA70) polymeric sponge preparation, compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Intapibool, Punyada, Monmaturapoj, Naruporn, Nampuksa, Katanchalee, Thongkorn, Kriangkrai, Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.394
_version_ 1784589645421477888
author Intapibool, Punyada
Monmaturapoj, Naruporn
Nampuksa, Katanchalee
Thongkorn, Kriangkrai
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
author_facet Intapibool, Punyada
Monmaturapoj, Naruporn
Nampuksa, Katanchalee
Thongkorn, Kriangkrai
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
author_sort Intapibool, Punyada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polymeric sponge technique is recommended for developing the desired porosity of Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) which may favor bone regeneration. PURPOSE: To investigate the healing of BCP with ratio of HA30/β‐TCP70 (HA30) and HA70/β‐TCP30 (HA70) polymeric sponge preparation, compare to commercial BCP (MBCP+TM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials were tested X‐ray diffraction (XRD) pattern and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. In eight male pigs, six calvarial defects were created in each subject. The defects were the filled with 1 cc of autogenous bone, MBCP+TM (MBCP), HA30, HA70, and left empty (negative group). The new bone formations, residual material particles and bone‐to‐graft contacts were analyzed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks. RESULTS: Fabricated BCP showed well‐distributed porosity. At 16 weeks, new bone formations were 45.26% (autogenous), 33.52% (MBCP), 24.34% (HA30), 19.43% (HA70) and 3.37% (negative). Residual material particles were 1.88% (autogenous), 17.58% (MBCP), 26.74% (HA30) and 37.03% (HA70). These values were not significant differences (Bonferroni correction <0.005). Bone‐to‐graft contacts were 73.68% (MBCP), which was significantly higher than 41.68% (HA30) and 14.32% (HA70; Bonferroni correction <0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Polymeric sponge technique offers well‐distributed porosity. The new bone formation and residual material particles were comparable to MBCP+TM, but the bone‐to‐graft contact was lower than MBCP+TM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8543482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85434822021-10-29 Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull Intapibool, Punyada Monmaturapoj, Naruporn Nampuksa, Katanchalee Thongkorn, Kriangkrai Khongkhunthian, Pathawee Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles BACKGROUND: Polymeric sponge technique is recommended for developing the desired porosity of Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) which may favor bone regeneration. PURPOSE: To investigate the healing of BCP with ratio of HA30/β‐TCP70 (HA30) and HA70/β‐TCP30 (HA70) polymeric sponge preparation, compare to commercial BCP (MBCP+TM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials were tested X‐ray diffraction (XRD) pattern and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. In eight male pigs, six calvarial defects were created in each subject. The defects were the filled with 1 cc of autogenous bone, MBCP+TM (MBCP), HA30, HA70, and left empty (negative group). The new bone formations, residual material particles and bone‐to‐graft contacts were analyzed at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks. RESULTS: Fabricated BCP showed well‐distributed porosity. At 16 weeks, new bone formations were 45.26% (autogenous), 33.52% (MBCP), 24.34% (HA30), 19.43% (HA70) and 3.37% (negative). Residual material particles were 1.88% (autogenous), 17.58% (MBCP), 26.74% (HA30) and 37.03% (HA70). These values were not significant differences (Bonferroni correction <0.005). Bone‐to‐graft contacts were 73.68% (MBCP), which was significantly higher than 41.68% (HA30) and 14.32% (HA70; Bonferroni correction <0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Polymeric sponge technique offers well‐distributed porosity. The new bone formation and residual material particles were comparable to MBCP+TM, but the bone‐to‐graft contact was lower than MBCP+TM. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8543482/ /pubmed/33410285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.394 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Intapibool, Punyada
Monmaturapoj, Naruporn
Nampuksa, Katanchalee
Thongkorn, Kriangkrai
Khongkhunthian, Pathawee
Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull
title Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull
title_full Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull
title_fullStr Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull
title_full_unstemmed Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull
title_short Bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—Alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (MBCP+TM technology): A histomorphometric study in porcine skull
title_sort bone regeneration of a polymeric sponge technique—alloplastic bone substitute materials compared with a commercial synthetic bone material (mbcp+tm technology): a histomorphometric study in porcine skull
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.394
work_keys_str_mv AT intapiboolpunyada boneregenerationofapolymericspongetechniquealloplasticbonesubstitutematerialscomparedwithacommercialsyntheticbonematerialmbcptmtechnologyahistomorphometricstudyinporcineskull
AT monmaturapojnaruporn boneregenerationofapolymericspongetechniquealloplasticbonesubstitutematerialscomparedwithacommercialsyntheticbonematerialmbcptmtechnologyahistomorphometricstudyinporcineskull
AT nampuksakatanchalee boneregenerationofapolymericspongetechniquealloplasticbonesubstitutematerialscomparedwithacommercialsyntheticbonematerialmbcptmtechnologyahistomorphometricstudyinporcineskull
AT thongkornkriangkrai boneregenerationofapolymericspongetechniquealloplasticbonesubstitutematerialscomparedwithacommercialsyntheticbonematerialmbcptmtechnologyahistomorphometricstudyinporcineskull
AT khongkhunthianpathawee boneregenerationofapolymericspongetechniquealloplasticbonesubstitutematerialscomparedwithacommercialsyntheticbonematerialmbcptmtechnologyahistomorphometricstudyinporcineskull