Cargando…

What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate experiences of implementing a new rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service. DESIGN: A theory-based qualitative evaluation with a focused ethnographic approach using non-participant observations and interviews with patient and clinic staff. Normalisation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lorenc, Ava, Brangan, Emer, Kesten, Joanna M, Horner, Paddy J, Clarke, Michael, Crofts, Megan, Steer, Jonathan, Turner, Jonathan, Muir, Peter, Horwood, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050109
_version_ 1784589663723323392
author Lorenc, Ava
Brangan, Emer
Kesten, Joanna M
Horner, Paddy J
Clarke, Michael
Crofts, Megan
Steer, Jonathan
Turner, Jonathan
Muir, Peter
Horwood, Jeremy
author_facet Lorenc, Ava
Brangan, Emer
Kesten, Joanna M
Horner, Paddy J
Clarke, Michael
Crofts, Megan
Steer, Jonathan
Turner, Jonathan
Muir, Peter
Horwood, Jeremy
author_sort Lorenc, Ava
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate experiences of implementing a new rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service. DESIGN: A theory-based qualitative evaluation with a focused ethnographic approach using non-participant observations and interviews with patient and clinic staff. Normalisation process theory was used to structure interview questions and thematic analysis. SETTING: A sexual health centre in Bristol, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 26 patients and 21 staff involved in the rapid sexually transmitted infection (STI) service were interviewed. Purposive sampling was aimed for a range of views and experiences and sociodemographics and STI results for patients, job grades and roles for staff. 40 hours of observations were conducted. RESULTS: Implementation of the new service required co-ordinated changes in practice across multiple staff teams. Patients also needed to make changes to how they accessed the service. Multiple small ‘pilots’ of process changes were necessary to find workable options. For example, the service was introduced in phases beginning with male patients. This responsive operating mode created challenges for delivering comprehensive training and communication in advance to all staff. However, staff worked together to adjust and improve the new service, and morale was buoyed through observing positive impacts on patient care. Patients valued faster results and avoiding unnecessary treatment. Patients reported that they were willing to drop-off self-samples and return for a follow-up appointment, enabling infection-specific treatment in accordance with test results, thus improving antimicrobial stewardship. CONCLUSIONS: The new service was acceptable to staff and patients. Implementation of service changes to improve access and delivery of care in the context of stretched resources can pose challenges for staff at all levels. Early evaluation of pilots of process changes played an important role in the success of the service by rapidly feeding back issues for adjustment. Visibility to staff of positive impacts on patient care is important in maintaining morale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8543645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85436452021-11-10 What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? Lorenc, Ava Brangan, Emer Kesten, Joanna M Horner, Paddy J Clarke, Michael Crofts, Megan Steer, Jonathan Turner, Jonathan Muir, Peter Horwood, Jeremy BMJ Open Sexual Health OBJECTIVES: To investigate experiences of implementing a new rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service. DESIGN: A theory-based qualitative evaluation with a focused ethnographic approach using non-participant observations and interviews with patient and clinic staff. Normalisation process theory was used to structure interview questions and thematic analysis. SETTING: A sexual health centre in Bristol, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 26 patients and 21 staff involved in the rapid sexually transmitted infection (STI) service were interviewed. Purposive sampling was aimed for a range of views and experiences and sociodemographics and STI results for patients, job grades and roles for staff. 40 hours of observations were conducted. RESULTS: Implementation of the new service required co-ordinated changes in practice across multiple staff teams. Patients also needed to make changes to how they accessed the service. Multiple small ‘pilots’ of process changes were necessary to find workable options. For example, the service was introduced in phases beginning with male patients. This responsive operating mode created challenges for delivering comprehensive training and communication in advance to all staff. However, staff worked together to adjust and improve the new service, and morale was buoyed through observing positive impacts on patient care. Patients valued faster results and avoiding unnecessary treatment. Patients reported that they were willing to drop-off self-samples and return for a follow-up appointment, enabling infection-specific treatment in accordance with test results, thus improving antimicrobial stewardship. CONCLUSIONS: The new service was acceptable to staff and patients. Implementation of service changes to improve access and delivery of care in the context of stretched resources can pose challenges for staff at all levels. Early evaluation of pilots of process changes played an important role in the success of the service by rapidly feeding back issues for adjustment. Visibility to staff of positive impacts on patient care is important in maintaining morale. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8543645/ /pubmed/34686552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050109 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Sexual Health
Lorenc, Ava
Brangan, Emer
Kesten, Joanna M
Horner, Paddy J
Clarke, Michael
Crofts, Megan
Steer, Jonathan
Turner, Jonathan
Muir, Peter
Horwood, Jeremy
What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?
title What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?
title_full What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?
title_fullStr What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?
title_full_unstemmed What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?
title_short What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?
title_sort what can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?
topic Sexual Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050109
work_keys_str_mv AT lorencava whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT branganemer whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT kestenjoannam whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT hornerpaddyj whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT clarkemichael whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT croftsmegan whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT steerjonathan whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT turnerjonathan whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT muirpeter whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice
AT horwoodjeremy whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice