Cargando…
What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?
OBJECTIVES: To investigate experiences of implementing a new rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service. DESIGN: A theory-based qualitative evaluation with a focused ethnographic approach using non-participant observations and interviews with patient and clinic staff. Normalisation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050109 |
_version_ | 1784589663723323392 |
---|---|
author | Lorenc, Ava Brangan, Emer Kesten, Joanna M Horner, Paddy J Clarke, Michael Crofts, Megan Steer, Jonathan Turner, Jonathan Muir, Peter Horwood, Jeremy |
author_facet | Lorenc, Ava Brangan, Emer Kesten, Joanna M Horner, Paddy J Clarke, Michael Crofts, Megan Steer, Jonathan Turner, Jonathan Muir, Peter Horwood, Jeremy |
author_sort | Lorenc, Ava |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate experiences of implementing a new rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service. DESIGN: A theory-based qualitative evaluation with a focused ethnographic approach using non-participant observations and interviews with patient and clinic staff. Normalisation process theory was used to structure interview questions and thematic analysis. SETTING: A sexual health centre in Bristol, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 26 patients and 21 staff involved in the rapid sexually transmitted infection (STI) service were interviewed. Purposive sampling was aimed for a range of views and experiences and sociodemographics and STI results for patients, job grades and roles for staff. 40 hours of observations were conducted. RESULTS: Implementation of the new service required co-ordinated changes in practice across multiple staff teams. Patients also needed to make changes to how they accessed the service. Multiple small ‘pilots’ of process changes were necessary to find workable options. For example, the service was introduced in phases beginning with male patients. This responsive operating mode created challenges for delivering comprehensive training and communication in advance to all staff. However, staff worked together to adjust and improve the new service, and morale was buoyed through observing positive impacts on patient care. Patients valued faster results and avoiding unnecessary treatment. Patients reported that they were willing to drop-off self-samples and return for a follow-up appointment, enabling infection-specific treatment in accordance with test results, thus improving antimicrobial stewardship. CONCLUSIONS: The new service was acceptable to staff and patients. Implementation of service changes to improve access and delivery of care in the context of stretched resources can pose challenges for staff at all levels. Early evaluation of pilots of process changes played an important role in the success of the service by rapidly feeding back issues for adjustment. Visibility to staff of positive impacts on patient care is important in maintaining morale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8543645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85436452021-11-10 What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? Lorenc, Ava Brangan, Emer Kesten, Joanna M Horner, Paddy J Clarke, Michael Crofts, Megan Steer, Jonathan Turner, Jonathan Muir, Peter Horwood, Jeremy BMJ Open Sexual Health OBJECTIVES: To investigate experiences of implementing a new rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service. DESIGN: A theory-based qualitative evaluation with a focused ethnographic approach using non-participant observations and interviews with patient and clinic staff. Normalisation process theory was used to structure interview questions and thematic analysis. SETTING: A sexual health centre in Bristol, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 26 patients and 21 staff involved in the rapid sexually transmitted infection (STI) service were interviewed. Purposive sampling was aimed for a range of views and experiences and sociodemographics and STI results for patients, job grades and roles for staff. 40 hours of observations were conducted. RESULTS: Implementation of the new service required co-ordinated changes in practice across multiple staff teams. Patients also needed to make changes to how they accessed the service. Multiple small ‘pilots’ of process changes were necessary to find workable options. For example, the service was introduced in phases beginning with male patients. This responsive operating mode created challenges for delivering comprehensive training and communication in advance to all staff. However, staff worked together to adjust and improve the new service, and morale was buoyed through observing positive impacts on patient care. Patients valued faster results and avoiding unnecessary treatment. Patients reported that they were willing to drop-off self-samples and return for a follow-up appointment, enabling infection-specific treatment in accordance with test results, thus improving antimicrobial stewardship. CONCLUSIONS: The new service was acceptable to staff and patients. Implementation of service changes to improve access and delivery of care in the context of stretched resources can pose challenges for staff at all levels. Early evaluation of pilots of process changes played an important role in the success of the service by rapidly feeding back issues for adjustment. Visibility to staff of positive impacts on patient care is important in maintaining morale. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8543645/ /pubmed/34686552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050109 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Sexual Health Lorenc, Ava Brangan, Emer Kesten, Joanna M Horner, Paddy J Clarke, Michael Crofts, Megan Steer, Jonathan Turner, Jonathan Muir, Peter Horwood, Jeremy What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? |
title | What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? |
title_full | What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? |
title_fullStr | What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? |
title_full_unstemmed | What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? |
title_short | What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? |
title_sort | what can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service? |
topic | Sexual Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorencava whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT branganemer whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT kestenjoannam whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT hornerpaddyj whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT clarkemichael whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT croftsmegan whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT steerjonathan whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT turnerjonathan whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT muirpeter whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice AT horwoodjeremy whatcanbelearntfromaqualitativeevaluationofimplementingarapidsexualhealthtestingdiagnosisandtreatmentservice |