Cargando…
Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms
BACKGROUND: In the process of designing drugs and proteins, it is crucial to recognize hot regions in protein–protein interactions. Each hot region of protein–protein interaction is composed of at least three hot spots, which play an important role in binding. However, it takes time and labor force...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04420-0 |
_version_ | 1784589694560894976 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Jing Zhou, Longwei Li, Bo Zhang, Xiaolong Chen, Nansheng |
author_facet | Hu, Jing Zhou, Longwei Li, Bo Zhang, Xiaolong Chen, Nansheng |
author_sort | Hu, Jing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the process of designing drugs and proteins, it is crucial to recognize hot regions in protein–protein interactions. Each hot region of protein–protein interaction is composed of at least three hot spots, which play an important role in binding. However, it takes time and labor force to identify hot spots through biological experiments. If predictive models based on machine learning methods can be trained, the drug design process can be effectively accelerated. RESULTS: The results show that different machine learning algorithms perform similarly, as evaluating using the F-measure. The main differences between these methods are recall and precision. Since the key attribute of hot regions is that they are packed tightly, we used the cluster algorithm to predict hot regions. By combining Gaussian Naïve Bayes and DBSCAN, the F-measure of hot region prediction can reach 0.809. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, different machine learning models such as Gaussian Naïve Bayes, SVM, Xgboost, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network are used to predict hot spots. The experiment results show that the combination of hot spot classification algorithm with higher recall rate and clustering algorithm with higher precision can effectively improve the accuracy of hot region prediction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-021-04420-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8543831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85438312021-10-25 Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms Hu, Jing Zhou, Longwei Li, Bo Zhang, Xiaolong Chen, Nansheng BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: In the process of designing drugs and proteins, it is crucial to recognize hot regions in protein–protein interactions. Each hot region of protein–protein interaction is composed of at least three hot spots, which play an important role in binding. However, it takes time and labor force to identify hot spots through biological experiments. If predictive models based on machine learning methods can be trained, the drug design process can be effectively accelerated. RESULTS: The results show that different machine learning algorithms perform similarly, as evaluating using the F-measure. The main differences between these methods are recall and precision. Since the key attribute of hot regions is that they are packed tightly, we used the cluster algorithm to predict hot regions. By combining Gaussian Naïve Bayes and DBSCAN, the F-measure of hot region prediction can reach 0.809. CONCLUSIONS: In this paper, different machine learning models such as Gaussian Naïve Bayes, SVM, Xgboost, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network are used to predict hot spots. The experiment results show that the combination of hot spot classification algorithm with higher recall rate and clustering algorithm with higher precision can effectively improve the accuracy of hot region prediction. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-021-04420-0. BioMed Central 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8543831/ /pubmed/34696728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04420-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hu, Jing Zhou, Longwei Li, Bo Zhang, Xiaolong Chen, Nansheng Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms |
title | Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms |
title_full | Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms |
title_fullStr | Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms |
title_short | Improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms |
title_sort | improve hot region prediction by analyzing different machine learning algorithms |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04420-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hujing improvehotregionpredictionbyanalyzingdifferentmachinelearningalgorithms AT zhoulongwei improvehotregionpredictionbyanalyzingdifferentmachinelearningalgorithms AT libo improvehotregionpredictionbyanalyzingdifferentmachinelearningalgorithms AT zhangxiaolong improvehotregionpredictionbyanalyzingdifferentmachinelearningalgorithms AT chennansheng improvehotregionpredictionbyanalyzingdifferentmachinelearningalgorithms |