Cargando…

Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Early pregnancy loss (unintended pregnancy loss before 20 completed weeks of gestation) is a common adverse pregnancy outcome, with previous evidence reporting incidence ranging from 10 to 30% of detected pregnancies. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schummers, L., Oveisi, N., Ohtsuka, M. S., Hutcheon, J. A., Ahrens, K. A., Liauw, J., Norman, W. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01815-1
_version_ 1784589715281805312
author Schummers, L.
Oveisi, N.
Ohtsuka, M. S.
Hutcheon, J. A.
Ahrens, K. A.
Liauw, J.
Norman, W. V.
author_facet Schummers, L.
Oveisi, N.
Ohtsuka, M. S.
Hutcheon, J. A.
Ahrens, K. A.
Liauw, J.
Norman, W. V.
author_sort Schummers, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early pregnancy loss (unintended pregnancy loss before 20 completed weeks of gestation) is a common adverse pregnancy outcome, with previous evidence reporting incidence ranging from 10 to 30% of detected pregnancies. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the incidence and range of early pregnancy loss in contemporary pregnant populations based on studies with good internal and external validity. Findings may be useful for clinical counseling in pre-conception and family planning settings and for people who experience early pregnancy loss. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases using combinations of medical subject headings and keywords. Peer-reviewed, full-text original research articles that meet the following criteria will be included: (1) human study; (2) study designs: controlled clinical trials or observational studies with at least 100 pregnancies in the denominator, or systematic reviews of studies using these designs; (3) conducted in high-income countries; (4) reporting early pregnancy loss incidence, defined as unintended early pregnancy loss occurring prior to 20 weeks’ gestation expressed as the number of losses among all pregnancies in the study period; (5) among a contemporary (1990 or later) general population of pregnancies; and (6) published between January 1, 1990, and August 31, 2021. We will assess the quality of included studies according to the United States Preventive Services Task Force Criteria for Assessing Internal and External Validity of Individual Studies. If appropriate, based on methodological comparability across included studies, we will conduct meta-analyses using random effects models to estimate the pooled incidence of early pregnancy loss among all studies with both good internal and external validity, with meta-analyses stratified by study design type (survey-based or self-reported and medical record-based), by induced abortion restrictions (restricted vs. unrestricted), and by gestational age (first trimester only vs. all gestational ages before 20 weeks). DISCUSSION: This systematic review will synthesize existing evidence to calculate a current estimate of early pregnancy loss incidence and variability in reported incidence estimates in high-income settings. The findings of this review may inform updates to clinical counseling in pre-conception and family planning settings, as well as for patients experiencing early pregnancy loss. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: We have registered this review with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO #226267). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01815-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8543941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85439412021-10-25 Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Schummers, L. Oveisi, N. Ohtsuka, M. S. Hutcheon, J. A. Ahrens, K. A. Liauw, J. Norman, W. V. Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Early pregnancy loss (unintended pregnancy loss before 20 completed weeks of gestation) is a common adverse pregnancy outcome, with previous evidence reporting incidence ranging from 10 to 30% of detected pregnancies. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the incidence and range of early pregnancy loss in contemporary pregnant populations based on studies with good internal and external validity. Findings may be useful for clinical counseling in pre-conception and family planning settings and for people who experience early pregnancy loss. METHODS: We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases using combinations of medical subject headings and keywords. Peer-reviewed, full-text original research articles that meet the following criteria will be included: (1) human study; (2) study designs: controlled clinical trials or observational studies with at least 100 pregnancies in the denominator, or systematic reviews of studies using these designs; (3) conducted in high-income countries; (4) reporting early pregnancy loss incidence, defined as unintended early pregnancy loss occurring prior to 20 weeks’ gestation expressed as the number of losses among all pregnancies in the study period; (5) among a contemporary (1990 or later) general population of pregnancies; and (6) published between January 1, 1990, and August 31, 2021. We will assess the quality of included studies according to the United States Preventive Services Task Force Criteria for Assessing Internal and External Validity of Individual Studies. If appropriate, based on methodological comparability across included studies, we will conduct meta-analyses using random effects models to estimate the pooled incidence of early pregnancy loss among all studies with both good internal and external validity, with meta-analyses stratified by study design type (survey-based or self-reported and medical record-based), by induced abortion restrictions (restricted vs. unrestricted), and by gestational age (first trimester only vs. all gestational ages before 20 weeks). DISCUSSION: This systematic review will synthesize existing evidence to calculate a current estimate of early pregnancy loss incidence and variability in reported incidence estimates in high-income settings. The findings of this review may inform updates to clinical counseling in pre-conception and family planning settings, as well as for patients experiencing early pregnancy loss. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: We have registered this review with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO #226267). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-021-01815-1. BioMed Central 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8543941/ /pubmed/34696805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01815-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Schummers, L.
Oveisi, N.
Ohtsuka, M. S.
Hutcheon, J. A.
Ahrens, K. A.
Liauw, J.
Norman, W. V.
Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort early pregnancy loss incidence in high-income settings: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01815-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schummersl earlypregnancylossincidenceinhighincomesettingsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oveisin earlypregnancylossincidenceinhighincomesettingsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ohtsukams earlypregnancylossincidenceinhighincomesettingsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hutcheonja earlypregnancylossincidenceinhighincomesettingsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ahrenska earlypregnancylossincidenceinhighincomesettingsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liauwj earlypregnancylossincidenceinhighincomesettingsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT normanwv earlypregnancylossincidenceinhighincomesettingsaprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis