Cargando…

Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate visual, refractive and safety outcomes in eyes after they underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. METHODS: This was a single center observational study conducted at Ashford and St Pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Latham, Samuel Giles, Carr, Francis, Ali, Hala, Gangwani, Vinod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02142-8
_version_ 1784589716468793344
author Latham, Samuel Giles
Carr, Francis
Ali, Hala
Gangwani, Vinod
author_facet Latham, Samuel Giles
Carr, Francis
Ali, Hala
Gangwani, Vinod
author_sort Latham, Samuel Giles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate visual, refractive and safety outcomes in eyes after they underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. METHODS: This was a single center observational study conducted at Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. Patients were included if they had cataract extraction with in-the-bag implantation of the EyeCee® One preloaded intraocular lens from August to October 2019. Pre-operative, surgery-related and 2 weeks and 3 months post-operative data was collected. Surgeons at this trust were then asked to complete a feedback form to evaluate their experience of implanting the EyeCee® One. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two eyes were included in the study. Ninety-four (62%) of these eyes had cataract but no concomitant ocular pathology that could potentially affect visual acuity. Three months post-operatively, 98.7% of all eyes had monocular CDVA ≤0.3 logMAR. 100% of the eyes without concomitant ocular pathology achieved this target. The mean CDVA of all eyes in this study improved from 0.43 ± 0.43 logMAR pre-operatively, to 0.05 ± 0.11 logMAR post-operatively (p < 0.05). The mean sphere and spherical equivalent values showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) and (p < 0.05). There were no intraoperative complications and 1.3% of patients reported complications 2 weeks post-operatively. All of the participating surgeons said they would use the EyeCee® One again with 64% providing an overall rating of ‘excellent’ for their experience of implanting this intraocular lens. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates excellent post-operative visual acuity and refractive outcomes in eyes after EyeCee® One implantation. This is accompanied with very little risk of intraoperative and post-operative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8543946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85439462021-10-25 Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population Latham, Samuel Giles Carr, Francis Ali, Hala Gangwani, Vinod BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate visual, refractive and safety outcomes in eyes after they underwent phacoemulsification and implantation of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens. METHODS: This was a single center observational study conducted at Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom. Patients were included if they had cataract extraction with in-the-bag implantation of the EyeCee® One preloaded intraocular lens from August to October 2019. Pre-operative, surgery-related and 2 weeks and 3 months post-operative data was collected. Surgeons at this trust were then asked to complete a feedback form to evaluate their experience of implanting the EyeCee® One. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two eyes were included in the study. Ninety-four (62%) of these eyes had cataract but no concomitant ocular pathology that could potentially affect visual acuity. Three months post-operatively, 98.7% of all eyes had monocular CDVA ≤0.3 logMAR. 100% of the eyes without concomitant ocular pathology achieved this target. The mean CDVA of all eyes in this study improved from 0.43 ± 0.43 logMAR pre-operatively, to 0.05 ± 0.11 logMAR post-operatively (p < 0.05). The mean sphere and spherical equivalent values showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) and (p < 0.05). There were no intraoperative complications and 1.3% of patients reported complications 2 weeks post-operatively. All of the participating surgeons said they would use the EyeCee® One again with 64% providing an overall rating of ‘excellent’ for their experience of implanting this intraocular lens. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates excellent post-operative visual acuity and refractive outcomes in eyes after EyeCee® One implantation. This is accompanied with very little risk of intraoperative and post-operative complications. BioMed Central 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8543946/ /pubmed/34696772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02142-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Latham, Samuel Giles
Carr, Francis
Ali, Hala
Gangwani, Vinod
Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population
title Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population
title_full Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population
title_fullStr Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population
title_full_unstemmed Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population
title_short Clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population
title_sort clinical safety and efficacy of a preloaded monofocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens in a real-world population
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34696772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02142-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lathamsamuelgiles clinicalsafetyandefficacyofapreloadedmonofocalhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensinarealworldpopulation
AT carrfrancis clinicalsafetyandefficacyofapreloadedmonofocalhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensinarealworldpopulation
AT alihala clinicalsafetyandefficacyofapreloadedmonofocalhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensinarealworldpopulation
AT gangwanivinod clinicalsafetyandefficacyofapreloadedmonofocalhydrophobicacrylicintraocularlensinarealworldpopulation