Cargando…

Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To compare dental plaque removal efficacy with a manual and powered toothbrush in 10–14 years old visually and auditory impaired children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The proposed study was a randomized controlled study. The ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethical b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Nikhil G, Bargale, Seema, Shah, Swara, Ardeshana, Akash, Kariya, Pratik B, Patel, Harshangi N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720508
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1949
_version_ 1784589725677387776
author Patel, Nikhil G
Bargale, Seema
Shah, Swara
Ardeshana, Akash
Kariya, Pratik B
Patel, Harshangi N
author_facet Patel, Nikhil G
Bargale, Seema
Shah, Swara
Ardeshana, Akash
Kariya, Pratik B
Patel, Harshangi N
author_sort Patel, Nikhil G
collection PubMed
description AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To compare dental plaque removal efficacy with a manual and powered toothbrush in 10–14 years old visually and auditory impaired children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The proposed study was a randomized controlled study. The ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethical board. The written informed consent for the study was taken from the parents. The 60 participants were categorized into group I: visually impaired (30) and group II: speech and hearing impaired (30) which were again divided into I1 (manual toothbrush) and I2 (powered toothbrush); II1 (manual toothbrush) and II2 (powered toothbrush), respectively. The baseline score was recorded using Turesky–Gilmor–Glickman Modification of The Quigley–Hein plaque Index. The oral prophylaxis was performed and then randomization of the toothbrush group was done with concealed allocation method. The plaque-removal efficacy was evaluated at the end of the 15 days in the visually and hearing-impaired children. RESULTS: The mean score of dental plaque at baseline was 1.44 for the manual toothbrush group and 1.65 for the powered toothbrush group in visually impaired children, respectively. In blind children with a manual toothbrush, the mean score difference was 0.14 while the powered toothbrush showed the mean score difference of 0.30 which is significant. The mean score of dental plaque at baseline was 1.74 for the manual toothbrush group and 1.80 for the powered toothbrush group in auditory impaired children. In auditory impaired children with manual toothbrushes, the mean score difference was 0.15 while the powered toothbrush showed the mean score of 0.32 which was significant. CONCLUSION: Dental plaque reduction was significantly better with the powered toothbrush as compared to a manual toothbrush in visually and auditory impaired children. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Patel NG, Bargale S, Shah S, et al. Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(3):364–368.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8543990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85439902021-10-29 Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study Patel, Nikhil G Bargale, Seema Shah, Swara Ardeshana, Akash Kariya, Pratik B Patel, Harshangi N Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To compare dental plaque removal efficacy with a manual and powered toothbrush in 10–14 years old visually and auditory impaired children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The proposed study was a randomized controlled study. The ethical approval was obtained from the institutional ethical board. The written informed consent for the study was taken from the parents. The 60 participants were categorized into group I: visually impaired (30) and group II: speech and hearing impaired (30) which were again divided into I1 (manual toothbrush) and I2 (powered toothbrush); II1 (manual toothbrush) and II2 (powered toothbrush), respectively. The baseline score was recorded using Turesky–Gilmor–Glickman Modification of The Quigley–Hein plaque Index. The oral prophylaxis was performed and then randomization of the toothbrush group was done with concealed allocation method. The plaque-removal efficacy was evaluated at the end of the 15 days in the visually and hearing-impaired children. RESULTS: The mean score of dental plaque at baseline was 1.44 for the manual toothbrush group and 1.65 for the powered toothbrush group in visually impaired children, respectively. In blind children with a manual toothbrush, the mean score difference was 0.14 while the powered toothbrush showed the mean score difference of 0.30 which is significant. The mean score of dental plaque at baseline was 1.74 for the manual toothbrush group and 1.80 for the powered toothbrush group in auditory impaired children. In auditory impaired children with manual toothbrushes, the mean score difference was 0.15 while the powered toothbrush showed the mean score of 0.32 which was significant. CONCLUSION: Dental plaque reduction was significantly better with the powered toothbrush as compared to a manual toothbrush in visually and auditory impaired children. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Patel NG, Bargale S, Shah S, et al. Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(3):364–368. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8543990/ /pubmed/34720508 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1949 Text en Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2021 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Patel, Nikhil G
Bargale, Seema
Shah, Swara
Ardeshana, Akash
Kariya, Pratik B
Patel, Harshangi N
Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study
title Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Comparison of Plaque Removal Efficacy with Powered and Manual Toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old Visually and Auditory Impaired Children: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort comparison of plaque removal efficacy with powered and manual toothbrushes in 10–14-year-old visually and auditory impaired children: a randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8543990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720508
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1949
work_keys_str_mv AT patelnikhilg comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacywithpoweredandmanualtoothbrushesin1014yearoldvisuallyandauditoryimpairedchildrenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT bargaleseema comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacywithpoweredandmanualtoothbrushesin1014yearoldvisuallyandauditoryimpairedchildrenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT shahswara comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacywithpoweredandmanualtoothbrushesin1014yearoldvisuallyandauditoryimpairedchildrenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ardeshanaakash comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacywithpoweredandmanualtoothbrushesin1014yearoldvisuallyandauditoryimpairedchildrenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kariyapratikb comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacywithpoweredandmanualtoothbrushesin1014yearoldvisuallyandauditoryimpairedchildrenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT patelharshangin comparisonofplaqueremovalefficacywithpoweredandmanualtoothbrushesin1014yearoldvisuallyandauditoryimpairedchildrenarandomizedcontrolledstudy