Cargando…

Normative values of visual evoked potential in adults

PURPOSE: Visual evoked potentials (VEP) are used to determine the function of visual pathway from the optic nerve to visual cortex. Various factors may affect VEP response, viz., technical and environmental. The aim of this study is to obtain the normative value of VEP latency and amplitude paramete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekayanti, Merry Septemi, Mahama, Corry Novita, Ngantung, Denny Jefferson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8544058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427213
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2480_20
_version_ 1784589739446239232
author Ekayanti, Merry Septemi
Mahama, Corry Novita
Ngantung, Denny Jefferson
author_facet Ekayanti, Merry Septemi
Mahama, Corry Novita
Ngantung, Denny Jefferson
author_sort Ekayanti, Merry Septemi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Visual evoked potentials (VEP) are used to determine the function of visual pathway from the optic nerve to visual cortex. Various factors may affect VEP response, viz., technical and environmental. The aim of this study is to obtain the normative value of VEP latency and amplitude parameters in adulthood in Indonesia, as well as the relationship of height, weight, body mass index (BMI), head circumference, and visual acuity with the variety of latency and amplitude values of VEP parameters. METHODS: It is a cross-sectional study on 120 healthy subjects consisting of 60 males and 60 females between 18 and 65 years old. Height, weight, BMI, head circumference, and visual acuity were measured and continued with VEP examination using a 26′ checkerboard pattern on the left and right eyes alternately. All data were collected and analyzed with the Shapiro–Wilk test using statistical software R version 3.5.2. RESULTS: Mean value of P100 latency (interocular latency) of left and right eye were 104.6 ± 3.4 ms and 104.1 ± 3.4 ms, respectively, as well as 9.8 ± 4.7 μV and 10.3 ± 5.4 μV for the amplitude. There was no significant difference between the male and female group, as well as on the age group. Female significantly exhibited a higher P100 amplitude than male. The greater the age, the lower amplitude of P100 significantly. CONCLUSION: Gender and age do not affect the P100 latency value but only affect P100 amplitude. Height, weight, BMI, head circumference, and visual acuity also do not affect the P100 latency and amplitude.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8544058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85440582021-10-29 Normative values of visual evoked potential in adults Ekayanti, Merry Septemi Mahama, Corry Novita Ngantung, Denny Jefferson Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: Visual evoked potentials (VEP) are used to determine the function of visual pathway from the optic nerve to visual cortex. Various factors may affect VEP response, viz., technical and environmental. The aim of this study is to obtain the normative value of VEP latency and amplitude parameters in adulthood in Indonesia, as well as the relationship of height, weight, body mass index (BMI), head circumference, and visual acuity with the variety of latency and amplitude values of VEP parameters. METHODS: It is a cross-sectional study on 120 healthy subjects consisting of 60 males and 60 females between 18 and 65 years old. Height, weight, BMI, head circumference, and visual acuity were measured and continued with VEP examination using a 26′ checkerboard pattern on the left and right eyes alternately. All data were collected and analyzed with the Shapiro–Wilk test using statistical software R version 3.5.2. RESULTS: Mean value of P100 latency (interocular latency) of left and right eye were 104.6 ± 3.4 ms and 104.1 ± 3.4 ms, respectively, as well as 9.8 ± 4.7 μV and 10.3 ± 5.4 μV for the amplitude. There was no significant difference between the male and female group, as well as on the age group. Female significantly exhibited a higher P100 amplitude than male. The greater the age, the lower amplitude of P100 significantly. CONCLUSION: Gender and age do not affect the P100 latency value but only affect P100 amplitude. Height, weight, BMI, head circumference, and visual acuity also do not affect the P100 latency and amplitude. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-09 2021-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8544058/ /pubmed/34427213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2480_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ekayanti, Merry Septemi
Mahama, Corry Novita
Ngantung, Denny Jefferson
Normative values of visual evoked potential in adults
title Normative values of visual evoked potential in adults
title_full Normative values of visual evoked potential in adults
title_fullStr Normative values of visual evoked potential in adults
title_full_unstemmed Normative values of visual evoked potential in adults
title_short Normative values of visual evoked potential in adults
title_sort normative values of visual evoked potential in adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8544058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34427213
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2480_20
work_keys_str_mv AT ekayantimerryseptemi normativevaluesofvisualevokedpotentialinadults
AT mahamacorrynovita normativevaluesofvisualevokedpotentialinadults
AT ngantungdennyjefferson normativevaluesofvisualevokedpotentialinadults