Cargando…

The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose

Purpose The frequency of periprosthetic knee infections increases yearly because of the popularity of the total knee prostheses. Revision knee arthroplasty is an annoying problem for both the surgeons and the patients. Debridément, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a popular alternative f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Öztürk, Özkan, Özdemir, Mahmut, Turgut, Mehmet Cenk, Altay, Murat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8544802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722006
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18946
_version_ 1784589894316720128
author Öztürk, Özkan
Özdemir, Mahmut
Turgut, Mehmet Cenk
Altay, Murat
author_facet Öztürk, Özkan
Özdemir, Mahmut
Turgut, Mehmet Cenk
Altay, Murat
author_sort Öztürk, Özkan
collection PubMed
description Purpose The frequency of periprosthetic knee infections increases yearly because of the popularity of the total knee prostheses. Revision knee arthroplasty is an annoying problem for both the surgeons and the patients. Debridément, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a popular alternative for the treatment of periprosthetic knee infections. Little is known about the fate of the failed DAIR patients. This study aims to investigate the effect of the failed DAIR on the clinical result after two-staged revision arthroplasty. Method Ninety-nine two-staged revision arthroplasties and 85 DAIR patients from two reference clinics were retrospectively analyzed. The minimum follow-up was 36 months. Patients were grouped according to the treatment as, two-staged revision without DAIR, two-staged revision after failed DAIR, and successful DAIR. Their Knee Society Scores (KSS), functional KSS (KSS-f) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were analyzed and compared. Results DAIR has a 52.9% success rate for the treatment of infection. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive peptide levels are not risk factors for failure, but the time passed since the index surgery is a risk factor for worse outcome scores. Failed DAIR is not a risk factor for reinfection after two-staged revision. Last KSS after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 83.98±7.033, 91.89±4.386, and 91.38±4.735, respectively. Last KSS-f after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 86.25±9.524, 94.56±8.106, and 94.85±5.996, respectively. Last WOMAC after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 86.16±7.745, 94.750±4.964, and 93.319±5.961, respectively.  Conclusion Failed DAIR is associated with lesser, but still good, or excellent clinical scores. DAIR is suggested as a promising treatment option for periprosthetic knee infections in well-selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8544802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85448022021-10-28 The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose Öztürk, Özkan Özdemir, Mahmut Turgut, Mehmet Cenk Altay, Murat Cureus Orthopedics Purpose The frequency of periprosthetic knee infections increases yearly because of the popularity of the total knee prostheses. Revision knee arthroplasty is an annoying problem for both the surgeons and the patients. Debridément, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a popular alternative for the treatment of periprosthetic knee infections. Little is known about the fate of the failed DAIR patients. This study aims to investigate the effect of the failed DAIR on the clinical result after two-staged revision arthroplasty. Method Ninety-nine two-staged revision arthroplasties and 85 DAIR patients from two reference clinics were retrospectively analyzed. The minimum follow-up was 36 months. Patients were grouped according to the treatment as, two-staged revision without DAIR, two-staged revision after failed DAIR, and successful DAIR. Their Knee Society Scores (KSS), functional KSS (KSS-f) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were analyzed and compared. Results DAIR has a 52.9% success rate for the treatment of infection. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive peptide levels are not risk factors for failure, but the time passed since the index surgery is a risk factor for worse outcome scores. Failed DAIR is not a risk factor for reinfection after two-staged revision. Last KSS after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 83.98±7.033, 91.89±4.386, and 91.38±4.735, respectively. Last KSS-f after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 86.25±9.524, 94.56±8.106, and 94.85±5.996, respectively. Last WOMAC after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 86.16±7.745, 94.750±4.964, and 93.319±5.961, respectively.  Conclusion Failed DAIR is associated with lesser, but still good, or excellent clinical scores. DAIR is suggested as a promising treatment option for periprosthetic knee infections in well-selected patients. Cureus 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8544802/ /pubmed/34722006 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18946 Text en Copyright © 2021, Öztürk et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Öztürk, Özkan
Özdemir, Mahmut
Turgut, Mehmet Cenk
Altay, Murat
The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose
title The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose
title_full The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose
title_fullStr The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose
title_full_unstemmed The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose
title_short The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose
title_sort fate of failed debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in infected knee arthroplasties: nothing to lose
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8544802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722006
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18946
work_keys_str_mv AT ozturkozkan thefateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose
AT ozdemirmahmut thefateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose
AT turgutmehmetcenk thefateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose
AT altaymurat thefateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose
AT ozturkozkan fateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose
AT ozdemirmahmut fateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose
AT turgutmehmetcenk fateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose
AT altaymurat fateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose