Cargando…
The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose
Purpose The frequency of periprosthetic knee infections increases yearly because of the popularity of the total knee prostheses. Revision knee arthroplasty is an annoying problem for both the surgeons and the patients. Debridément, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a popular alternative f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8544802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722006 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18946 |
_version_ | 1784589894316720128 |
---|---|
author | Öztürk, Özkan Özdemir, Mahmut Turgut, Mehmet Cenk Altay, Murat |
author_facet | Öztürk, Özkan Özdemir, Mahmut Turgut, Mehmet Cenk Altay, Murat |
author_sort | Öztürk, Özkan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose The frequency of periprosthetic knee infections increases yearly because of the popularity of the total knee prostheses. Revision knee arthroplasty is an annoying problem for both the surgeons and the patients. Debridément, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a popular alternative for the treatment of periprosthetic knee infections. Little is known about the fate of the failed DAIR patients. This study aims to investigate the effect of the failed DAIR on the clinical result after two-staged revision arthroplasty. Method Ninety-nine two-staged revision arthroplasties and 85 DAIR patients from two reference clinics were retrospectively analyzed. The minimum follow-up was 36 months. Patients were grouped according to the treatment as, two-staged revision without DAIR, two-staged revision after failed DAIR, and successful DAIR. Their Knee Society Scores (KSS), functional KSS (KSS-f) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were analyzed and compared. Results DAIR has a 52.9% success rate for the treatment of infection. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive peptide levels are not risk factors for failure, but the time passed since the index surgery is a risk factor for worse outcome scores. Failed DAIR is not a risk factor for reinfection after two-staged revision. Last KSS after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 83.98±7.033, 91.89±4.386, and 91.38±4.735, respectively. Last KSS-f after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 86.25±9.524, 94.56±8.106, and 94.85±5.996, respectively. Last WOMAC after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 86.16±7.745, 94.750±4.964, and 93.319±5.961, respectively. Conclusion Failed DAIR is associated with lesser, but still good, or excellent clinical scores. DAIR is suggested as a promising treatment option for periprosthetic knee infections in well-selected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8544802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85448022021-10-28 The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose Öztürk, Özkan Özdemir, Mahmut Turgut, Mehmet Cenk Altay, Murat Cureus Orthopedics Purpose The frequency of periprosthetic knee infections increases yearly because of the popularity of the total knee prostheses. Revision knee arthroplasty is an annoying problem for both the surgeons and the patients. Debridément, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a popular alternative for the treatment of periprosthetic knee infections. Little is known about the fate of the failed DAIR patients. This study aims to investigate the effect of the failed DAIR on the clinical result after two-staged revision arthroplasty. Method Ninety-nine two-staged revision arthroplasties and 85 DAIR patients from two reference clinics were retrospectively analyzed. The minimum follow-up was 36 months. Patients were grouped according to the treatment as, two-staged revision without DAIR, two-staged revision after failed DAIR, and successful DAIR. Their Knee Society Scores (KSS), functional KSS (KSS-f) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were analyzed and compared. Results DAIR has a 52.9% success rate for the treatment of infection. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rates and C-reactive peptide levels are not risk factors for failure, but the time passed since the index surgery is a risk factor for worse outcome scores. Failed DAIR is not a risk factor for reinfection after two-staged revision. Last KSS after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 83.98±7.033, 91.89±4.386, and 91.38±4.735, respectively. Last KSS-f after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 86.25±9.524, 94.56±8.106, and 94.85±5.996, respectively. Last WOMAC after failed DAIR, successful DAIR, and two-staged revision were 86.16±7.745, 94.750±4.964, and 93.319±5.961, respectively. Conclusion Failed DAIR is associated with lesser, but still good, or excellent clinical scores. DAIR is suggested as a promising treatment option for periprosthetic knee infections in well-selected patients. Cureus 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8544802/ /pubmed/34722006 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18946 Text en Copyright © 2021, Öztürk et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Orthopedics Öztürk, Özkan Özdemir, Mahmut Turgut, Mehmet Cenk Altay, Murat The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose |
title | The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose |
title_full | The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose |
title_fullStr | The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose |
title_full_unstemmed | The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose |
title_short | The Fate of Failed Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Infected Knee Arthroplasties: Nothing to Lose |
title_sort | fate of failed debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in infected knee arthroplasties: nothing to lose |
topic | Orthopedics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8544802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722006 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozturkozkan thefateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose AT ozdemirmahmut thefateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose AT turgutmehmetcenk thefateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose AT altaymurat thefateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose AT ozturkozkan fateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose AT ozdemirmahmut fateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose AT turgutmehmetcenk fateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose AT altaymurat fateoffaileddebridementantibioticsandimplantretentionininfectedkneearthroplastiesnothingtolose |