Cargando…
Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women
BACKGROUND: Population-wide ultrasound screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men have already been established in some countries. Women account for one third of aneurysm-related mortality and are four times more likely to experience an AAA rupture than men. Whole-population sc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab220 |
_version_ | 1784589980642836480 |
---|---|
author | Duncan, A Maslen, C Gibson, C Hartshorne, T Farooqi, A Saratzis, A Bown, M J |
author_facet | Duncan, A Maslen, C Gibson, C Hartshorne, T Farooqi, A Saratzis, A Bown, M J |
author_sort | Duncan, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Population-wide ultrasound screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men have already been established in some countries. Women account for one third of aneurysm-related mortality and are four times more likely to experience an AAA rupture than men. Whole-population screening for AAA in women is unlikely to be clinically or economically effective. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of a targeted AAA screening programme for women at high risk of AAA. METHOD: Women aged 65–74 years deemed at high risk of having an AAA (current smokers, ex-smokers, or with a history of coronary artery disease) were invited to attend ultrasound screening (July 2016 to March 2019) for AAA in the Female Aneurysm screening STudy (FAST). Primary outcomes were attendance for screening and prevalence of AAA. Biometric data, medical history, quality of life (QoL) and aortic diameter on ultrasound imaging were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Some 6037 women were invited and 5200 attended screening (86.7 per cent). Fifteen AAAs larger than 29 mm were detected (prevalence 0.29 (95 per cent c.i. 0.18 to 0.48) per cent). Current smokers had the highest prevalence (0.83 (95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 1.89) per cent) but lowest attendance (75.2 per cent). Three AAAs greater than 5.5 cm were identified and referred for consideration of surgical repair; one woman underwent repair. There was a significant reduction in patient-reported QoL scores following screening. CONCLUSION: A low prevalence of AAA was detected in high-risk women, with lowest screening uptake in those at highest risk. Screening for AAA in high-risk women may not be beneficial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8545265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85452652021-10-26 Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women Duncan, A Maslen, C Gibson, C Hartshorne, T Farooqi, A Saratzis, A Bown, M J Br J Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Population-wide ultrasound screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men have already been established in some countries. Women account for one third of aneurysm-related mortality and are four times more likely to experience an AAA rupture than men. Whole-population screening for AAA in women is unlikely to be clinically or economically effective. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of a targeted AAA screening programme for women at high risk of AAA. METHOD: Women aged 65–74 years deemed at high risk of having an AAA (current smokers, ex-smokers, or with a history of coronary artery disease) were invited to attend ultrasound screening (July 2016 to March 2019) for AAA in the Female Aneurysm screening STudy (FAST). Primary outcomes were attendance for screening and prevalence of AAA. Biometric data, medical history, quality of life (QoL) and aortic diameter on ultrasound imaging were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Some 6037 women were invited and 5200 attended screening (86.7 per cent). Fifteen AAAs larger than 29 mm were detected (prevalence 0.29 (95 per cent c.i. 0.18 to 0.48) per cent). Current smokers had the highest prevalence (0.83 (95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 1.89) per cent) but lowest attendance (75.2 per cent). Three AAAs greater than 5.5 cm were identified and referred for consideration of surgical repair; one woman underwent repair. There was a significant reduction in patient-reported QoL scores following screening. CONCLUSION: A low prevalence of AAA was detected in high-risk women, with lowest screening uptake in those at highest risk. Screening for AAA in high-risk women may not be beneficial. Oxford University Press 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8545265/ /pubmed/34370826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab220 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Duncan, A Maslen, C Gibson, C Hartshorne, T Farooqi, A Saratzis, A Bown, M J Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women |
title | Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women |
title_full | Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women |
title_short | Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women |
title_sort | ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duncana ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen AT maslenc ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen AT gibsonc ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen AT hartshornet ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen AT farooqia ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen AT saratzisa ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen AT bownmj ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen |