Cargando…

Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women

BACKGROUND: Population-wide ultrasound screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men have already been established in some countries. Women account for one third of aneurysm-related mortality and are four times more likely to experience an AAA rupture than men. Whole-population sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duncan, A, Maslen, C, Gibson, C, Hartshorne, T, Farooqi, A, Saratzis, A, Bown, M J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab220
_version_ 1784589980642836480
author Duncan, A
Maslen, C
Gibson, C
Hartshorne, T
Farooqi, A
Saratzis, A
Bown, M J
author_facet Duncan, A
Maslen, C
Gibson, C
Hartshorne, T
Farooqi, A
Saratzis, A
Bown, M J
author_sort Duncan, A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Population-wide ultrasound screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men have already been established in some countries. Women account for one third of aneurysm-related mortality and are four times more likely to experience an AAA rupture than men. Whole-population screening for AAA in women is unlikely to be clinically or economically effective. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of a targeted AAA screening programme for women at high risk of AAA. METHOD: Women aged 65–74 years deemed at high risk of having an AAA (current smokers, ex-smokers, or with a history of coronary artery disease) were invited to attend ultrasound screening (July 2016 to March 2019) for AAA in the Female Aneurysm screening STudy (FAST). Primary outcomes were attendance for screening and prevalence of AAA. Biometric data, medical history, quality of life (QoL) and aortic diameter on ultrasound imaging were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Some 6037 women were invited and 5200 attended screening (86.7 per cent). Fifteen AAAs larger than 29 mm were detected (prevalence 0.29 (95 per cent c.i. 0.18 to 0.48) per cent). Current smokers had the highest prevalence (0.83 (95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 1.89) per cent) but lowest attendance (75.2 per cent). Three AAAs greater than 5.5 cm were identified and referred for consideration of surgical repair; one woman underwent repair. There was a significant reduction in patient-reported QoL scores following screening. CONCLUSION: A low prevalence of AAA was detected in high-risk women, with lowest screening uptake in those at highest risk. Screening for AAA in high-risk women may not be beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8545265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85452652021-10-26 Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women Duncan, A Maslen, C Gibson, C Hartshorne, T Farooqi, A Saratzis, A Bown, M J Br J Surg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Population-wide ultrasound screening programmes for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men have already been established in some countries. Women account for one third of aneurysm-related mortality and are four times more likely to experience an AAA rupture than men. Whole-population screening for AAA in women is unlikely to be clinically or economically effective. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of a targeted AAA screening programme for women at high risk of AAA. METHOD: Women aged 65–74 years deemed at high risk of having an AAA (current smokers, ex-smokers, or with a history of coronary artery disease) were invited to attend ultrasound screening (July 2016 to March 2019) for AAA in the Female Aneurysm screening STudy (FAST). Primary outcomes were attendance for screening and prevalence of AAA. Biometric data, medical history, quality of life (QoL) and aortic diameter on ultrasound imaging were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Some 6037 women were invited and 5200 attended screening (86.7 per cent). Fifteen AAAs larger than 29 mm were detected (prevalence 0.29 (95 per cent c.i. 0.18 to 0.48) per cent). Current smokers had the highest prevalence (0.83 (95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 1.89) per cent) but lowest attendance (75.2 per cent). Three AAAs greater than 5.5 cm were identified and referred for consideration of surgical repair; one woman underwent repair. There was a significant reduction in patient-reported QoL scores following screening. CONCLUSION: A low prevalence of AAA was detected in high-risk women, with lowest screening uptake in those at highest risk. Screening for AAA in high-risk women may not be beneficial. Oxford University Press 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8545265/ /pubmed/34370826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab220 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Duncan, A
Maslen, C
Gibson, C
Hartshorne, T
Farooqi, A
Saratzis, A
Bown, M J
Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women
title Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women
title_full Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women
title_fullStr Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women
title_short Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women
title_sort ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab220
work_keys_str_mv AT duncana ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen
AT maslenc ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen
AT gibsonc ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen
AT hartshornet ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen
AT farooqia ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen
AT saratzisa ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen
AT bownmj ultrasoundscreeningforabdominalaorticaneurysminhighriskwomen