Cargando…

Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort

Background and study aims  Endocuff Vision (ECV) increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) in randomized clinical trials; however, observational effectiveness data are lacking. We evaluated the effectiveness, safety, and practical aspects of ECV use in a large screening-related real-world cohort. Patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forbes, Nauzer, Hilsden, Robert J., Ruan, Yibing, Poirier, Abbey E., O’Sullivan, Dylan E., Craig, Kyla M., Kerrison, Diana, Brenner, Darren R., Heitman, Steven J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1533-6183
_version_ 1784590010065879040
author Forbes, Nauzer
Hilsden, Robert J.
Ruan, Yibing
Poirier, Abbey E.
O’Sullivan, Dylan E.
Craig, Kyla M.
Kerrison, Diana
Brenner, Darren R.
Heitman, Steven J.
author_facet Forbes, Nauzer
Hilsden, Robert J.
Ruan, Yibing
Poirier, Abbey E.
O’Sullivan, Dylan E.
Craig, Kyla M.
Kerrison, Diana
Brenner, Darren R.
Heitman, Steven J.
author_sort Forbes, Nauzer
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Endocuff Vision (ECV) increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) in randomized clinical trials; however, observational effectiveness data are lacking. We evaluated the effectiveness, safety, and practical aspects of ECV use in a large screening-related real-world cohort. Patients and methods  In this observational study, patients undergoing screening-related colonoscopy from November 2018 to April 2019 comprised the baseline period, and those undergoing it from June to November 2019 comprised the ECV period, where ECV use was discretionary. The primary outcome was ADR, compared: 1) between ECV use and standard colonoscopy across both periods; and 2) between time periods. Secondary outcomes included indication-specific ADR, sessile serrated ADR (SSADR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), procedure times, patient comfort scores, and sedation use. Multilevel logistic regression was performed, yielding adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results  In 15,814 colonoscopies across both time periods, ADR was 46.7 % with standard colonoscopy and 54.6 % when ECV was used ( P  < 0.001). Endoscopists used ECV in 77.6 % of procedures in the ECV period, during which overall ADR rose to 53.2 % compared to 46.3 % in the baseline period ( P  < 0.001). ECV use was significantly associated with higher ADR (AOR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.10 to 1.40) after adjusting for relevant covariates including time period. ECV use did not result in lower CIR, longer procedure time, increased sedation use, or poorer comfort scores. Conclusions  ECV use is associated with improved ADR without negatively impacting other key procedure and patient-related factors. Future studies should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating ECV into routine screening-related practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8545492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85454922021-10-27 Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort Forbes, Nauzer Hilsden, Robert J. Ruan, Yibing Poirier, Abbey E. O’Sullivan, Dylan E. Craig, Kyla M. Kerrison, Diana Brenner, Darren R. Heitman, Steven J. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Endocuff Vision (ECV) increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) in randomized clinical trials; however, observational effectiveness data are lacking. We evaluated the effectiveness, safety, and practical aspects of ECV use in a large screening-related real-world cohort. Patients and methods  In this observational study, patients undergoing screening-related colonoscopy from November 2018 to April 2019 comprised the baseline period, and those undergoing it from June to November 2019 comprised the ECV period, where ECV use was discretionary. The primary outcome was ADR, compared: 1) between ECV use and standard colonoscopy across both periods; and 2) between time periods. Secondary outcomes included indication-specific ADR, sessile serrated ADR (SSADR), cecal intubation rate (CIR), procedure times, patient comfort scores, and sedation use. Multilevel logistic regression was performed, yielding adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results  In 15,814 colonoscopies across both time periods, ADR was 46.7 % with standard colonoscopy and 54.6 % when ECV was used ( P  < 0.001). Endoscopists used ECV in 77.6 % of procedures in the ECV period, during which overall ADR rose to 53.2 % compared to 46.3 % in the baseline period ( P  < 0.001). ECV use was significantly associated with higher ADR (AOR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.10 to 1.40) after adjusting for relevant covariates including time period. ECV use did not result in lower CIR, longer procedure time, increased sedation use, or poorer comfort scores. Conclusions  ECV use is associated with improved ADR without negatively impacting other key procedure and patient-related factors. Future studies should evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating ECV into routine screening-related practice. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8545492/ /pubmed/34712550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1533-6183 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Forbes, Nauzer
Hilsden, Robert J.
Ruan, Yibing
Poirier, Abbey E.
O’Sullivan, Dylan E.
Craig, Kyla M.
Kerrison, Diana
Brenner, Darren R.
Heitman, Steven J.
Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort
title Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort
title_full Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort
title_fullStr Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort
title_full_unstemmed Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort
title_short Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort
title_sort endocuff vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1533-6183
work_keys_str_mv AT forbesnauzer endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort
AT hilsdenrobertj endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort
AT ruanyibing endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort
AT poirierabbeye endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort
AT osullivandylane endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort
AT craigkylam endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort
AT kerrisondiana endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort
AT brennerdarrenr endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort
AT heitmanstevenj endocuffvisionimprovesadenomadetectionrateinalargescreeningrelatedcohort