Cargando…

(18)F-FET-PET-guided gross total resection improves overall survival in patients with WHO grade III/IV glioma: moving towards a multimodal imaging-guided resection

PURPOSE: PET using radiolabeled amino acid [(18)F]-fluoro-ethyl-(L)-tyrosine (FET-PET) is a well-established imaging modality for glioma diagnostics. The biological tumor volume (BTV) as depicted by FET-PET often differs in volume and location from tumor volume of contrast enhancement (CE) in MRI. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ort, Jonas, Hamou, Hussam Aldin, Kernbach, Julius M., Hakvoort, Karlijn, Blume, Christian, Lohmann, Philipp, Galldiks, Norbert, Heiland, Dieter Henrik, Mottaghy, Felix M., Clusmann, Hans, Neuloh, Georg, Langen, Karl-Josef, Delev, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-021-03844-1
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: PET using radiolabeled amino acid [(18)F]-fluoro-ethyl-(L)-tyrosine (FET-PET) is a well-established imaging modality for glioma diagnostics. The biological tumor volume (BTV) as depicted by FET-PET often differs in volume and location from tumor volume of contrast enhancement (CE) in MRI. Our aim was to investigate whether a gross total resection of BTVs defined as < 1 cm(3) of residual BTV (PET GTR) correlates with better oncological outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed imaging and survival data from patients with primary and recurrent WHO grade III or IV gliomas who underwent FET-PET before surgical resection. Tumor overlap between FET-PET and CE was evaluated. Completeness of FET-PET resection (PET GTR) was calculated after superimposition and semi-automated segmentation of pre-operative FET-PET and postoperative MRI imaging. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: From 30 included patients, PET GTR was achieved in 20 patients. Patients with PET GTR showed improved median OS with 19.3 compared to 13.7 months for patients with residual FET uptake (p = 0.007; HR 0.3; 95% CI 0.12–0.76). This finding remained as independent prognostic factor after performing multivariate analysis (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.62, p = 0.006). Other survival influencing factors such as age, IDH-mutation, MGMT promotor status, and adjuvant treatment modalities were equally distributed between both groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PET GTR improves the OS in patients with WHO grade III or IV gliomas. A multimodal imaging approach including FET-PET for surgical planning in newly diagnosed and recurrent tumors may improve the oncological outcome in glioma patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-021-03844-1.