Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Bosutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Second-Line Setting

BACKGROUND: A recently conducted matching-adjusted indirect comparison demonstrated that bosutinib improved progression-free survival, and delayed progression to advanced disease compared with dasatinib and nilotinib in patients with second line (2L) chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muresan, B., Mamolo, C., Cappelleri, J. C., Postma, M. J., Heeg, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00666-0
_version_ 1784590060285329408
author Muresan, B.
Mamolo, C.
Cappelleri, J. C.
Postma, M. J.
Heeg, B.
author_facet Muresan, B.
Mamolo, C.
Cappelleri, J. C.
Postma, M. J.
Heeg, B.
author_sort Muresan, B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recently conducted matching-adjusted indirect comparison demonstrated that bosutinib improved progression-free survival, and delayed progression to advanced disease compared with dasatinib and nilotinib in patients with second line (2L) chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). However, the long-term clinical and economic impact of using bosutinib versus dasatinib and nilotinib has not been evaluated. The objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of bosutinib compared with dasatinib and bosutinib compared with nilotinib from a US payer perspective. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using partition survival methods and three health states: progression-free, progression, and death. Trial data (individual patient-level and aggregate-level data) informed the progression-free and overall survival estimates. Costs included drugs and medical resource use. Utility values were obtained from literature. Sensitivity analyses (SAs) included one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs). RESULTS: Comparing bosutinib versus dasatinib resulted in a gain of 0.4 discounted life years, 1.5 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental costs of $28,459 (values in 2020 US dollars), for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $19,811/QALY gained. Comparing bosutinib versus nilotinib resulted in a gain of 0.8 discounted life-years, 1.8 QALYs, and incremental costs of $76,563, for an ICER of $41,932/QALY gained. Drug costs and extrapolation distribution type were the main drivers of the model in the one-way SAs. In the PSAs, bosutinib had >90% and >80% probabilities of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY versus dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that compared with dasatinib and nilotinib, bosutinib may represent good value for money for treating 2L CP-CML patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-021-00666-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8545733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85457332021-10-29 Cost-Effectiveness of Bosutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Second-Line Setting Muresan, B. Mamolo, C. Cappelleri, J. C. Postma, M. J. Heeg, B. Appl Health Econ Health Policy Original Research Article BACKGROUND: A recently conducted matching-adjusted indirect comparison demonstrated that bosutinib improved progression-free survival, and delayed progression to advanced disease compared with dasatinib and nilotinib in patients with second line (2L) chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). However, the long-term clinical and economic impact of using bosutinib versus dasatinib and nilotinib has not been evaluated. The objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of bosutinib compared with dasatinib and bosutinib compared with nilotinib from a US payer perspective. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model was developed using partition survival methods and three health states: progression-free, progression, and death. Trial data (individual patient-level and aggregate-level data) informed the progression-free and overall survival estimates. Costs included drugs and medical resource use. Utility values were obtained from literature. Sensitivity analyses (SAs) included one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs). RESULTS: Comparing bosutinib versus dasatinib resulted in a gain of 0.4 discounted life years, 1.5 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental costs of $28,459 (values in 2020 US dollars), for an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $19,811/QALY gained. Comparing bosutinib versus nilotinib resulted in a gain of 0.8 discounted life-years, 1.8 QALYs, and incremental costs of $76,563, for an ICER of $41,932/QALY gained. Drug costs and extrapolation distribution type were the main drivers of the model in the one-way SAs. In the PSAs, bosutinib had >90% and >80% probabilities of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY versus dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that compared with dasatinib and nilotinib, bosutinib may represent good value for money for treating 2L CP-CML patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-021-00666-0. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8545733/ /pubmed/34250585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00666-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Muresan, B.
Mamolo, C.
Cappelleri, J. C.
Postma, M. J.
Heeg, B.
Cost-Effectiveness of Bosutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Second-Line Setting
title Cost-Effectiveness of Bosutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Second-Line Setting
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Bosutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Second-Line Setting
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Bosutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Second-Line Setting
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Bosutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Second-Line Setting
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Bosutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in the Second-Line Setting
title_sort cost-effectiveness of bosutinib for the treatment of adult patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia in the second-line setting
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-021-00666-0
work_keys_str_mv AT muresanb costeffectivenessofbosutinibforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithchronicphasechronicmyeloidleukemiainthesecondlinesetting
AT mamoloc costeffectivenessofbosutinibforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithchronicphasechronicmyeloidleukemiainthesecondlinesetting
AT cappellerijc costeffectivenessofbosutinibforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithchronicphasechronicmyeloidleukemiainthesecondlinesetting
AT postmamj costeffectivenessofbosutinibforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithchronicphasechronicmyeloidleukemiainthesecondlinesetting
AT heegb costeffectivenessofbosutinibforthetreatmentofadultpatientswithchronicphasechronicmyeloidleukemiainthesecondlinesetting