Cargando…

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Decreases the Incidence but Not the Size of New Brain Infarction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Analysis of the REDUCE Trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Randomized patent foramen ovale closure trials have used open-label end point ascertainment which increases the risk of bias and undermines confidence in the conclusions. The Gore REDUCE trial prospectively performed baseline and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Messé, Steven R., Erus, Guray, Bilello, Michel, Davatzikos, Christos, Andersen, Grethe, Iversen, Helle K., Roine, Risto O., Sjöstrand, Christina, Rhodes, John F., Søndergaard, Lars, Kasner, Scott E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34455822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034451
_version_ 1784590078106927104
author Messé, Steven R.
Erus, Guray
Bilello, Michel
Davatzikos, Christos
Andersen, Grethe
Iversen, Helle K.
Roine, Risto O.
Sjöstrand, Christina
Rhodes, John F.
Søndergaard, Lars
Kasner, Scott E.
author_facet Messé, Steven R.
Erus, Guray
Bilello, Michel
Davatzikos, Christos
Andersen, Grethe
Iversen, Helle K.
Roine, Risto O.
Sjöstrand, Christina
Rhodes, John F.
Søndergaard, Lars
Kasner, Scott E.
author_sort Messé, Steven R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Randomized patent foramen ovale closure trials have used open-label end point ascertainment which increases the risk of bias and undermines confidence in the conclusions. The Gore REDUCE trial prospectively performed baseline and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) for all subjects providing an objective measure of the effectiveness of closure. METHODS: We performed blinded evaluations of the presence, location, and volume of new infarct on diffusion-weighted imaging of recurrent clinical stroke or new infarct (>3 mm) on T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery from baseline to follow-up MRI at 2 years, comparing closure to medical therapy alone. We also examined the effect of shunt size and the development of atrial fibrillation on infarct burden at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, new clinical stroke or silent MRI infarct occurred in 18/383 (4.7%) patients who underwent closure and 19/177 (10.7%) medication-only patients (relative risk, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.24–0.81], P=0.02). Clinical strokes were less common in closure patients compared with medically treated patients, 5 (1.3%) versus 12 (6.8%), P=0.001, while silent MRI infarcts were similar, 13 (3.4%) versus 7 (4.0%), P=0.81. There were no differences in number, volumes, and distribution of new infarct comparing closure patients to those treated with medication alone. There were also no differences of number, volumes, and distribution comparing silent infarcts to clinical strokes. Infarct burden was also similar for patients who developed atrial fibrillation and for those with large shunts. CONCLUSIONS: The REDUCE trial demonstrates that patent foramen ovale closure prevents recurrent brain infarction based on the objective outcome of new infarcts on MRI. Only clinical strokes were reduced by closure while silent infarctions were similar between study arms, and there were no differences in infarct volume or location comparing silent infarcts to clinical strokes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00738894.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8545852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85458522021-10-26 Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Decreases the Incidence but Not the Size of New Brain Infarction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Analysis of the REDUCE Trial Messé, Steven R. Erus, Guray Bilello, Michel Davatzikos, Christos Andersen, Grethe Iversen, Helle K. Roine, Risto O. Sjöstrand, Christina Rhodes, John F. Søndergaard, Lars Kasner, Scott E. Stroke Clinical Trials BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Randomized patent foramen ovale closure trials have used open-label end point ascertainment which increases the risk of bias and undermines confidence in the conclusions. The Gore REDUCE trial prospectively performed baseline and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) for all subjects providing an objective measure of the effectiveness of closure. METHODS: We performed blinded evaluations of the presence, location, and volume of new infarct on diffusion-weighted imaging of recurrent clinical stroke or new infarct (>3 mm) on T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery from baseline to follow-up MRI at 2 years, comparing closure to medical therapy alone. We also examined the effect of shunt size and the development of atrial fibrillation on infarct burden at follow-up. RESULTS: At follow-up, new clinical stroke or silent MRI infarct occurred in 18/383 (4.7%) patients who underwent closure and 19/177 (10.7%) medication-only patients (relative risk, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.24–0.81], P=0.02). Clinical strokes were less common in closure patients compared with medically treated patients, 5 (1.3%) versus 12 (6.8%), P=0.001, while silent MRI infarcts were similar, 13 (3.4%) versus 7 (4.0%), P=0.81. There were no differences in number, volumes, and distribution of new infarct comparing closure patients to those treated with medication alone. There were also no differences of number, volumes, and distribution comparing silent infarcts to clinical strokes. Infarct burden was also similar for patients who developed atrial fibrillation and for those with large shunts. CONCLUSIONS: The REDUCE trial demonstrates that patent foramen ovale closure prevents recurrent brain infarction based on the objective outcome of new infarcts on MRI. Only clinical strokes were reduced by closure while silent infarctions were similar between study arms, and there were no differences in infarct volume or location comparing silent infarcts to clinical strokes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00738894. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-08-30 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8545852/ /pubmed/34455822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034451 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Stroke is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials
Messé, Steven R.
Erus, Guray
Bilello, Michel
Davatzikos, Christos
Andersen, Grethe
Iversen, Helle K.
Roine, Risto O.
Sjöstrand, Christina
Rhodes, John F.
Søndergaard, Lars
Kasner, Scott E.
Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Decreases the Incidence but Not the Size of New Brain Infarction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Analysis of the REDUCE Trial
title Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Decreases the Incidence but Not the Size of New Brain Infarction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Analysis of the REDUCE Trial
title_full Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Decreases the Incidence but Not the Size of New Brain Infarction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Analysis of the REDUCE Trial
title_fullStr Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Decreases the Incidence but Not the Size of New Brain Infarction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Analysis of the REDUCE Trial
title_full_unstemmed Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Decreases the Incidence but Not the Size of New Brain Infarction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Analysis of the REDUCE Trial
title_short Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Decreases the Incidence but Not the Size of New Brain Infarction on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Analysis of the REDUCE Trial
title_sort patent foramen ovale closure decreases the incidence but not the size of new brain infarction on magnetic resonance imaging: an analysis of the reduce trial
topic Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34455822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034451
work_keys_str_mv AT messestevenr patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT erusguray patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT bilellomichel patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT davatzikoschristos patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT andersengrethe patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT iversenhellek patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT roineristoo patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT sjostrandchristina patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT rhodesjohnf patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT søndergaardlars patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial
AT kasnerscotte patentforamenovaleclosuredecreasestheincidencebutnotthesizeofnewbraininfarctiononmagneticresonanceimagingananalysisofthereducetrial