Cargando…

Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Objective: Whether partial embolization could facilitate the post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) obliteration for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) remains controversial. We performed this study to compare the outcomes of SRS with and without prior embolization for bAVMs. Methods: We retros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Debin, Chen, Yu, Li, Zhipeng, Zhang, Haibin, Li, Ruinan, Yuan, Kexin, Han, Heze, Meng, Xiangyu, Jin, Hengwei, Gao, Dezhi, Li, Youxiang, Sun, Shibin, Liu, Ali, Chen, Xiaolin, Zhao, Yuanli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.752164
_version_ 1784590078571446272
author Yan, Debin
Chen, Yu
Li, Zhipeng
Zhang, Haibin
Li, Ruinan
Yuan, Kexin
Han, Heze
Meng, Xiangyu
Jin, Hengwei
Gao, Dezhi
Li, Youxiang
Sun, Shibin
Liu, Ali
Chen, Xiaolin
Zhao, Yuanli
author_facet Yan, Debin
Chen, Yu
Li, Zhipeng
Zhang, Haibin
Li, Ruinan
Yuan, Kexin
Han, Heze
Meng, Xiangyu
Jin, Hengwei
Gao, Dezhi
Li, Youxiang
Sun, Shibin
Liu, Ali
Chen, Xiaolin
Zhao, Yuanli
author_sort Yan, Debin
collection PubMed
description Objective: Whether partial embolization could facilitate the post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) obliteration for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) remains controversial. We performed this study to compare the outcomes of SRS with and without prior embolization for bAVMs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the Beijing Tiantan AVMs prospective registration research database from September 2011 to October 2014. Patients were categorized into two groups, combined upfront embolization and SRS (Em+SRS group) and SRS alone (SRS group), and we performed a propensity score matching analysis based on pre-embolization baseline characteristics; the matched groups each comprised 76 patients. Results: The obliteration rate was similar between SRS and Em+SRS (44.7 vs. 31.6%; OR, 1.754; 95% CI, 0.905–3.401; p = 0.096). However, the SRS group was superior to the Em+SRS group in terms of cumulative obliteration rate at a follow-up of 5 years (HR,1.778; 95% CI, 1.017–3.110; p = 0.033). The secondary outcomes, including functional state, post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, and edema or cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts. In the ruptured subgroup, the SRS group could achieve higher obliteration rate than Em+SRS group (56.5 vs. 31.9%; OR, 2.773; 95% CI, 1.190–6.464; p = 0.018). The cumulative obliteration rate at 5 years was also higher in the SRS group (64.5 vs. 41.3%; HR, 2.012; 95% CI, 1.037–3.903; p = 0.038), and the secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts. Conclusion: Although there was no significant difference in the overall obliteration rate between the two strategies, this study suggested that pre-SRS embolization may have a negative effect on post-SRS obliteration. Furthermore, the obliteration rates of the SRS only strategy was significantly higher than that of the Em+SRS strategy in the ruptured cohort, while no such phenomenon was found in the unruptured cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8545857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85458572021-10-27 Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Yan, Debin Chen, Yu Li, Zhipeng Zhang, Haibin Li, Ruinan Yuan, Kexin Han, Heze Meng, Xiangyu Jin, Hengwei Gao, Dezhi Li, Youxiang Sun, Shibin Liu, Ali Chen, Xiaolin Zhao, Yuanli Front Neurol Neurology Objective: Whether partial embolization could facilitate the post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) obliteration for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) remains controversial. We performed this study to compare the outcomes of SRS with and without prior embolization for bAVMs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the Beijing Tiantan AVMs prospective registration research database from September 2011 to October 2014. Patients were categorized into two groups, combined upfront embolization and SRS (Em+SRS group) and SRS alone (SRS group), and we performed a propensity score matching analysis based on pre-embolization baseline characteristics; the matched groups each comprised 76 patients. Results: The obliteration rate was similar between SRS and Em+SRS (44.7 vs. 31.6%; OR, 1.754; 95% CI, 0.905–3.401; p = 0.096). However, the SRS group was superior to the Em+SRS group in terms of cumulative obliteration rate at a follow-up of 5 years (HR,1.778; 95% CI, 1.017–3.110; p = 0.033). The secondary outcomes, including functional state, post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, and edema or cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts. In the ruptured subgroup, the SRS group could achieve higher obliteration rate than Em+SRS group (56.5 vs. 31.9%; OR, 2.773; 95% CI, 1.190–6.464; p = 0.018). The cumulative obliteration rate at 5 years was also higher in the SRS group (64.5 vs. 41.3%; HR, 2.012; 95% CI, 1.037–3.903; p = 0.038), and the secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts. Conclusion: Although there was no significant difference in the overall obliteration rate between the two strategies, this study suggested that pre-SRS embolization may have a negative effect on post-SRS obliteration. Furthermore, the obliteration rates of the SRS only strategy was significantly higher than that of the Em+SRS strategy in the ruptured cohort, while no such phenomenon was found in the unruptured cohort. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8545857/ /pubmed/34712200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.752164 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yan, Chen, Li, Zhang, Li, Yuan, Han, Meng, Jin, Gao, Li, Sun, Liu, Chen and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Yan, Debin
Chen, Yu
Li, Zhipeng
Zhang, Haibin
Li, Ruinan
Yuan, Kexin
Han, Heze
Meng, Xiangyu
Jin, Hengwei
Gao, Dezhi
Li, Youxiang
Sun, Shibin
Liu, Ali
Chen, Xiaolin
Zhao, Yuanli
Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_fullStr Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_short Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_sort stereotactic radiosurgery with vs. without prior embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score matching analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712200
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.752164
work_keys_str_mv AT yandebin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT chenyu stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT lizhipeng stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT zhanghaibin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liruinan stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT yuankexin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT hanheze stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT mengxiangyu stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT jinhengwei stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT gaodezhi stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liyouxiang stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT sunshibin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liuali stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT chenxiaolin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT zhaoyuanli stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis