Cargando…
Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Objective: Whether partial embolization could facilitate the post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) obliteration for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) remains controversial. We performed this study to compare the outcomes of SRS with and without prior embolization for bAVMs. Methods: We retros...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.752164 |
_version_ | 1784590078571446272 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Debin Chen, Yu Li, Zhipeng Zhang, Haibin Li, Ruinan Yuan, Kexin Han, Heze Meng, Xiangyu Jin, Hengwei Gao, Dezhi Li, Youxiang Sun, Shibin Liu, Ali Chen, Xiaolin Zhao, Yuanli |
author_facet | Yan, Debin Chen, Yu Li, Zhipeng Zhang, Haibin Li, Ruinan Yuan, Kexin Han, Heze Meng, Xiangyu Jin, Hengwei Gao, Dezhi Li, Youxiang Sun, Shibin Liu, Ali Chen, Xiaolin Zhao, Yuanli |
author_sort | Yan, Debin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Whether partial embolization could facilitate the post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) obliteration for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) remains controversial. We performed this study to compare the outcomes of SRS with and without prior embolization for bAVMs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the Beijing Tiantan AVMs prospective registration research database from September 2011 to October 2014. Patients were categorized into two groups, combined upfront embolization and SRS (Em+SRS group) and SRS alone (SRS group), and we performed a propensity score matching analysis based on pre-embolization baseline characteristics; the matched groups each comprised 76 patients. Results: The obliteration rate was similar between SRS and Em+SRS (44.7 vs. 31.6%; OR, 1.754; 95% CI, 0.905–3.401; p = 0.096). However, the SRS group was superior to the Em+SRS group in terms of cumulative obliteration rate at a follow-up of 5 years (HR,1.778; 95% CI, 1.017–3.110; p = 0.033). The secondary outcomes, including functional state, post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, and edema or cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts. In the ruptured subgroup, the SRS group could achieve higher obliteration rate than Em+SRS group (56.5 vs. 31.9%; OR, 2.773; 95% CI, 1.190–6.464; p = 0.018). The cumulative obliteration rate at 5 years was also higher in the SRS group (64.5 vs. 41.3%; HR, 2.012; 95% CI, 1.037–3.903; p = 0.038), and the secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts. Conclusion: Although there was no significant difference in the overall obliteration rate between the two strategies, this study suggested that pre-SRS embolization may have a negative effect on post-SRS obliteration. Furthermore, the obliteration rates of the SRS only strategy was significantly higher than that of the Em+SRS strategy in the ruptured cohort, while no such phenomenon was found in the unruptured cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8545857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85458572021-10-27 Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Yan, Debin Chen, Yu Li, Zhipeng Zhang, Haibin Li, Ruinan Yuan, Kexin Han, Heze Meng, Xiangyu Jin, Hengwei Gao, Dezhi Li, Youxiang Sun, Shibin Liu, Ali Chen, Xiaolin Zhao, Yuanli Front Neurol Neurology Objective: Whether partial embolization could facilitate the post-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) obliteration for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) remains controversial. We performed this study to compare the outcomes of SRS with and without prior embolization for bAVMs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the Beijing Tiantan AVMs prospective registration research database from September 2011 to October 2014. Patients were categorized into two groups, combined upfront embolization and SRS (Em+SRS group) and SRS alone (SRS group), and we performed a propensity score matching analysis based on pre-embolization baseline characteristics; the matched groups each comprised 76 patients. Results: The obliteration rate was similar between SRS and Em+SRS (44.7 vs. 31.6%; OR, 1.754; 95% CI, 0.905–3.401; p = 0.096). However, the SRS group was superior to the Em+SRS group in terms of cumulative obliteration rate at a follow-up of 5 years (HR,1.778; 95% CI, 1.017–3.110; p = 0.033). The secondary outcomes, including functional state, post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, and edema or cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts. In the ruptured subgroup, the SRS group could achieve higher obliteration rate than Em+SRS group (56.5 vs. 31.9%; OR, 2.773; 95% CI, 1.190–6.464; p = 0.018). The cumulative obliteration rate at 5 years was also higher in the SRS group (64.5 vs. 41.3%; HR, 2.012; 95% CI, 1.037–3.903; p = 0.038), and the secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts. Conclusion: Although there was no significant difference in the overall obliteration rate between the two strategies, this study suggested that pre-SRS embolization may have a negative effect on post-SRS obliteration. Furthermore, the obliteration rates of the SRS only strategy was significantly higher than that of the Em+SRS strategy in the ruptured cohort, while no such phenomenon was found in the unruptured cohort. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8545857/ /pubmed/34712200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.752164 Text en Copyright © 2021 Yan, Chen, Li, Zhang, Li, Yuan, Han, Meng, Jin, Gao, Li, Sun, Liu, Chen and Zhao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Yan, Debin Chen, Yu Li, Zhipeng Zhang, Haibin Li, Ruinan Yuan, Kexin Han, Heze Meng, Xiangyu Jin, Hengwei Gao, Dezhi Li, Youxiang Sun, Shibin Liu, Ali Chen, Xiaolin Zhao, Yuanli Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title | Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_full | Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_short | Stereotactic Radiosurgery With vs. Without Prior Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_sort | stereotactic radiosurgery with vs. without prior embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score matching analysis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34712200 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.752164 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yandebin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT chenyu stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT lizhipeng stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT zhanghaibin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT liruinan stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT yuankexin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT hanheze stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT mengxiangyu stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT jinhengwei stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT gaodezhi stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT liyouxiang stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT sunshibin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT liuali stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT chenxiaolin stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT zhaoyuanli stereotacticradiosurgerywithvswithoutpriorembolizationforbrainarteriovenousmalformationsapropensityscorematchinganalysis |