Cargando…
Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration
Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies allow a better understanding of the causal effects of modifiable exposures on health outcomes, but the published evidence is often hampered by inadequate reporting. Reporting guidelines help authors effectively communicate all critical information about what was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2233 |
_version_ | 1784590198470868992 |
---|---|
author | Skrivankova, Veronika W Richmond, Rebecca C Woolf, Benjamin A R Davies, Neil M Swanson, Sonja A VanderWeele, Tyler J Timpson, Nicholas J Higgins, Julian P T Dimou, Niki Langenberg, Claudia Loder, Elizabeth W Golub, Robert M Egger, Matthias Davey Smith, George Richards, J Brent |
author_facet | Skrivankova, Veronika W Richmond, Rebecca C Woolf, Benjamin A R Davies, Neil M Swanson, Sonja A VanderWeele, Tyler J Timpson, Nicholas J Higgins, Julian P T Dimou, Niki Langenberg, Claudia Loder, Elizabeth W Golub, Robert M Egger, Matthias Davey Smith, George Richards, J Brent |
author_sort | Skrivankova, Veronika W |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies allow a better understanding of the causal effects of modifiable exposures on health outcomes, but the published evidence is often hampered by inadequate reporting. Reporting guidelines help authors effectively communicate all critical information about what was done and what was found. STROBE-MR (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation) assists authors in reporting their MR research clearly and transparently. Adopting STROBE-MR should help readers, reviewers, and journal editors evaluate the quality of published MR studies. This article explains the 20 items of the STROBE-MR checklist, along with their meaning and rationale, using terms defined in a glossary. Examples of transparent reporting are used for each item to illustrate best practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8546498 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85464982021-11-10 Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration Skrivankova, Veronika W Richmond, Rebecca C Woolf, Benjamin A R Davies, Neil M Swanson, Sonja A VanderWeele, Tyler J Timpson, Nicholas J Higgins, Julian P T Dimou, Niki Langenberg, Claudia Loder, Elizabeth W Golub, Robert M Egger, Matthias Davey Smith, George Richards, J Brent BMJ Research Methods & Reporting Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies allow a better understanding of the causal effects of modifiable exposures on health outcomes, but the published evidence is often hampered by inadequate reporting. Reporting guidelines help authors effectively communicate all critical information about what was done and what was found. STROBE-MR (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation) assists authors in reporting their MR research clearly and transparently. Adopting STROBE-MR should help readers, reviewers, and journal editors evaluate the quality of published MR studies. This article explains the 20 items of the STROBE-MR checklist, along with their meaning and rationale, using terms defined in a glossary. Examples of transparent reporting are used for each item to illustrate best practices. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8546498/ /pubmed/34702754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2233 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Methods & Reporting Skrivankova, Veronika W Richmond, Rebecca C Woolf, Benjamin A R Davies, Neil M Swanson, Sonja A VanderWeele, Tyler J Timpson, Nicholas J Higgins, Julian P T Dimou, Niki Langenberg, Claudia Loder, Elizabeth W Golub, Robert M Egger, Matthias Davey Smith, George Richards, J Brent Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration |
title | Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration |
title_full | Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration |
title_fullStr | Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration |
title_full_unstemmed | Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration |
title_short | Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration |
title_sort | strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (strobe-mr): explanation and elaboration |
topic | Research Methods & Reporting |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546498/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skrivankovaveronikaw strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT richmondrebeccac strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT woolfbenjaminar strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT daviesneilm strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT swansonsonjaa strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT vanderweeletylerj strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT timpsonnicholasj strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT higginsjulianpt strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT dimouniki strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT langenbergclaudia strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT loderelizabethw strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT golubrobertm strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT eggermatthias strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT daveysmithgeorge strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration AT richardsjbrent strengtheningthereportingofobservationalstudiesinepidemiologyusingmendelianrandomisationstrobemrexplanationandelaboration |