Cargando…
Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires
BACKGROUND: Empathy has long been considered a multidimensional construct, encompassing cognitive, affective and behavioral domains. Deficits in empathic competences in early childhood contribute to psychopathology, and have been variably implicated in several clinical conditions, such as autism spe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733649 http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i10.876 |
_version_ | 1784590257134501888 |
---|---|
author | Sesso, Gianluca Brancati, Giulio Emilio Fantozzi, Pamela Inguaggiato, Emanuela Milone, Annarita Masi, Gabriele |
author_facet | Sesso, Gianluca Brancati, Giulio Emilio Fantozzi, Pamela Inguaggiato, Emanuela Milone, Annarita Masi, Gabriele |
author_sort | Sesso, Gianluca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Empathy has long been considered a multidimensional construct, encompassing cognitive, affective and behavioral domains. Deficits in empathic competences in early childhood contribute to psychopathology, and have been variably implicated in several clinical conditions, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and conduct disorders. AIM: To identify and describe empirically validated questionnaires assessing empathy in children and adolescents and to provide a summary of related theoretical perspectives on empathy definitional issues. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Three bibliographic databases were searched. A total of 47 studies were selected for final analysis and 16 distinct measures were identified and described. RESULTS: Questionable to excellent levels of internal consistency were observed, while few studies assessed test–retest reliability. Although construct definitions only partially overlapped, affective and cognitive domains of empathy were the commonest internal factors that were often separately evaluated. New facets of the construct (i.e., somatic empathy and sympathy) and specific clinical populations (i.e., ASD) could be specifically addressed through more recent instruments. CONCLUSION: The combination of different assessment methods is recommended in order to foresee further improvements in this field and try to overcome the problem of limited convergence with more objective measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8546775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85467752021-11-02 Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires Sesso, Gianluca Brancati, Giulio Emilio Fantozzi, Pamela Inguaggiato, Emanuela Milone, Annarita Masi, Gabriele World J Psychiatry Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Empathy has long been considered a multidimensional construct, encompassing cognitive, affective and behavioral domains. Deficits in empathic competences in early childhood contribute to psychopathology, and have been variably implicated in several clinical conditions, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and conduct disorders. AIM: To identify and describe empirically validated questionnaires assessing empathy in children and adolescents and to provide a summary of related theoretical perspectives on empathy definitional issues. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Three bibliographic databases were searched. A total of 47 studies were selected for final analysis and 16 distinct measures were identified and described. RESULTS: Questionable to excellent levels of internal consistency were observed, while few studies assessed test–retest reliability. Although construct definitions only partially overlapped, affective and cognitive domains of empathy were the commonest internal factors that were often separately evaluated. New facets of the construct (i.e., somatic empathy and sympathy) and specific clinical populations (i.e., ASD) could be specifically addressed through more recent instruments. CONCLUSION: The combination of different assessment methods is recommended in order to foresee further improvements in this field and try to overcome the problem of limited convergence with more objective measures. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8546775/ /pubmed/34733649 http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i10.876 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Sesso, Gianluca Brancati, Giulio Emilio Fantozzi, Pamela Inguaggiato, Emanuela Milone, Annarita Masi, Gabriele Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires |
title | Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires |
title_full | Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires |
title_fullStr | Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires |
title_full_unstemmed | Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires |
title_short | Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires |
title_sort | measures of empathy in children and adolescents: a systematic review of questionnaires |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733649 http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i10.876 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sessogianluca measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires AT brancatigiulioemilio measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires AT fantozzipamela measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires AT inguaggiatoemanuela measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires AT miloneannarita measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires AT masigabriele measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires |