Cargando…

Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires

BACKGROUND: Empathy has long been considered a multidimensional construct, encompassing cognitive, affective and behavioral domains. Deficits in empathic competences in early childhood contribute to psychopathology, and have been variably implicated in several clinical conditions, such as autism spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sesso, Gianluca, Brancati, Giulio Emilio, Fantozzi, Pamela, Inguaggiato, Emanuela, Milone, Annarita, Masi, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733649
http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i10.876
_version_ 1784590257134501888
author Sesso, Gianluca
Brancati, Giulio Emilio
Fantozzi, Pamela
Inguaggiato, Emanuela
Milone, Annarita
Masi, Gabriele
author_facet Sesso, Gianluca
Brancati, Giulio Emilio
Fantozzi, Pamela
Inguaggiato, Emanuela
Milone, Annarita
Masi, Gabriele
author_sort Sesso, Gianluca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Empathy has long been considered a multidimensional construct, encompassing cognitive, affective and behavioral domains. Deficits in empathic competences in early childhood contribute to psychopathology, and have been variably implicated in several clinical conditions, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and conduct disorders. AIM: To identify and describe empirically validated questionnaires assessing empathy in children and adolescents and to provide a summary of related theoretical perspectives on empathy definitional issues. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Three bibliographic databases were searched. A total of 47 studies were selected for final analysis and 16 distinct measures were identified and described. RESULTS: Questionable to excellent levels of internal consistency were observed, while few studies assessed test–retest reliability. Although construct definitions only partially overlapped, affective and cognitive domains of empathy were the commonest internal factors that were often separately evaluated. New facets of the construct (i.e., somatic empathy and sympathy) and specific clinical populations (i.e., ASD) could be specifically addressed through more recent instruments. CONCLUSION: The combination of different assessment methods is recommended in order to foresee further improvements in this field and try to overcome the problem of limited convergence with more objective measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8546775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85467752021-11-02 Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires Sesso, Gianluca Brancati, Giulio Emilio Fantozzi, Pamela Inguaggiato, Emanuela Milone, Annarita Masi, Gabriele World J Psychiatry Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Empathy has long been considered a multidimensional construct, encompassing cognitive, affective and behavioral domains. Deficits in empathic competences in early childhood contribute to psychopathology, and have been variably implicated in several clinical conditions, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and conduct disorders. AIM: To identify and describe empirically validated questionnaires assessing empathy in children and adolescents and to provide a summary of related theoretical perspectives on empathy definitional issues. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Three bibliographic databases were searched. A total of 47 studies were selected for final analysis and 16 distinct measures were identified and described. RESULTS: Questionable to excellent levels of internal consistency were observed, while few studies assessed test–retest reliability. Although construct definitions only partially overlapped, affective and cognitive domains of empathy were the commonest internal factors that were often separately evaluated. New facets of the construct (i.e., somatic empathy and sympathy) and specific clinical populations (i.e., ASD) could be specifically addressed through more recent instruments. CONCLUSION: The combination of different assessment methods is recommended in order to foresee further improvements in this field and try to overcome the problem of limited convergence with more objective measures. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8546775/ /pubmed/34733649 http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i10.876 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Sesso, Gianluca
Brancati, Giulio Emilio
Fantozzi, Pamela
Inguaggiato, Emanuela
Milone, Annarita
Masi, Gabriele
Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires
title Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires
title_full Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires
title_fullStr Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires
title_full_unstemmed Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires
title_short Measures of empathy in children and adolescents: A systematic review of questionnaires
title_sort measures of empathy in children and adolescents: a systematic review of questionnaires
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34733649
http://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i10.876
work_keys_str_mv AT sessogianluca measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires
AT brancatigiulioemilio measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires
AT fantozzipamela measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires
AT inguaggiatoemanuela measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires
AT miloneannarita measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires
AT masigabriele measuresofempathyinchildrenandadolescentsasystematicreviewofquestionnaires