Cargando…

Perception and Experience of Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Physicians and Patients in Europe and Canada

INTRODUCTION: The Biologics in Atopic Dermatitis: Experiences & Learnings (BADEL) project aims to improve real-life understanding of how, where, and when biologics can play a role in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ameen, Mahreen, Meller, Stephan, Pinter, Andreas, Shear, Neil H., Soria, Angele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34704230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-021-00631-8
_version_ 1784590354654167040
author Ameen, Mahreen
Meller, Stephan
Pinter, Andreas
Shear, Neil H.
Soria, Angele
author_facet Ameen, Mahreen
Meller, Stephan
Pinter, Andreas
Shear, Neil H.
Soria, Angele
author_sort Ameen, Mahreen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Biologics in Atopic Dermatitis: Experiences & Learnings (BADEL) project aims to improve real-life understanding of how, where, and when biologics can play a role in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. METHODS: Individual experiences of 24 patients with moderate-to-severe AD and who had been treated with biologic therapy (dupilumab) for ≥ 3–6 months, and 20 HCPs with a sub-specialty interest in AD were collected by means of focus groups held in Canada, Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom. Dupilumab was the only biologic therapy available at the time of the study. RESULTS: Most patients had suffered from AD for many years, particularly from itch and psychosocial issues, with AD negatively impacting all aspects of their life. They had experienced a long treatment journey and seen many dermatologists, enduring treatment delays and failures. They had been prescribed various therapies without long-term success. Biologics provided symptom improvement, offering many patients a near-normal quality of life. Side effects, especially conjunctivitis, were the greatest drawback, and there were a few issues with incomplete or unreliable efficacy. HCPs agreed that biologic therapy for AD in the majority of patients demonstrated rapid onset, good efficacy and tolerability, and are a viable option in patients who had exhausted all other treatment options. However, those patients who failed to sufficiently respond or developed intolerable adverse effects, particularly ocular symptoms, require alternative therapeutic options. CONCLUSION: Biologics can provide a near-normal quality of life for many patients with AD. Patients with AD who have failed conventional therapies should be offered all such novel therapies. Education and good patient–HCP communication will enable patients to manage their disease and treatment expectations. Patients and HCPs alike eagerly await alternative targeted therapies, which will offer greater choice and flexibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8547298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85472982021-10-27 Perception and Experience of Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Physicians and Patients in Europe and Canada Ameen, Mahreen Meller, Stephan Pinter, Andreas Shear, Neil H. Soria, Angele Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) Original Research INTRODUCTION: The Biologics in Atopic Dermatitis: Experiences & Learnings (BADEL) project aims to improve real-life understanding of how, where, and when biologics can play a role in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients. METHODS: Individual experiences of 24 patients with moderate-to-severe AD and who had been treated with biologic therapy (dupilumab) for ≥ 3–6 months, and 20 HCPs with a sub-specialty interest in AD were collected by means of focus groups held in Canada, Germany, France, Italy and the United Kingdom. Dupilumab was the only biologic therapy available at the time of the study. RESULTS: Most patients had suffered from AD for many years, particularly from itch and psychosocial issues, with AD negatively impacting all aspects of their life. They had experienced a long treatment journey and seen many dermatologists, enduring treatment delays and failures. They had been prescribed various therapies without long-term success. Biologics provided symptom improvement, offering many patients a near-normal quality of life. Side effects, especially conjunctivitis, were the greatest drawback, and there were a few issues with incomplete or unreliable efficacy. HCPs agreed that biologic therapy for AD in the majority of patients demonstrated rapid onset, good efficacy and tolerability, and are a viable option in patients who had exhausted all other treatment options. However, those patients who failed to sufficiently respond or developed intolerable adverse effects, particularly ocular symptoms, require alternative therapeutic options. CONCLUSION: Biologics can provide a near-normal quality of life for many patients with AD. Patients with AD who have failed conventional therapies should be offered all such novel therapies. Education and good patient–HCP communication will enable patients to manage their disease and treatment expectations. Patients and HCPs alike eagerly await alternative targeted therapies, which will offer greater choice and flexibility. Springer Healthcare 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8547298/ /pubmed/34704230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-021-00631-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Ameen, Mahreen
Meller, Stephan
Pinter, Andreas
Shear, Neil H.
Soria, Angele
Perception and Experience of Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Physicians and Patients in Europe and Canada
title Perception and Experience of Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Physicians and Patients in Europe and Canada
title_full Perception and Experience of Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Physicians and Patients in Europe and Canada
title_fullStr Perception and Experience of Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Physicians and Patients in Europe and Canada
title_full_unstemmed Perception and Experience of Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Physicians and Patients in Europe and Canada
title_short Perception and Experience of Biologic Therapy in Atopic Dermatitis: A Qualitative Focus Group Study of Physicians and Patients in Europe and Canada
title_sort perception and experience of biologic therapy in atopic dermatitis: a qualitative focus group study of physicians and patients in europe and canada
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34704230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-021-00631-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ameenmahreen perceptionandexperienceofbiologictherapyinatopicdermatitisaqualitativefocusgroupstudyofphysiciansandpatientsineuropeandcanada
AT mellerstephan perceptionandexperienceofbiologictherapyinatopicdermatitisaqualitativefocusgroupstudyofphysiciansandpatientsineuropeandcanada
AT pinterandreas perceptionandexperienceofbiologictherapyinatopicdermatitisaqualitativefocusgroupstudyofphysiciansandpatientsineuropeandcanada
AT shearneilh perceptionandexperienceofbiologictherapyinatopicdermatitisaqualitativefocusgroupstudyofphysiciansandpatientsineuropeandcanada
AT soriaangele perceptionandexperienceofbiologictherapyinatopicdermatitisaqualitativefocusgroupstudyofphysiciansandpatientsineuropeandcanada
AT perceptionandexperienceofbiologictherapyinatopicdermatitisaqualitativefocusgroupstudyofphysiciansandpatientsineuropeandcanada