Cargando…
Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program
BACKGROUND: Human trafficking is a serious global challenge associated with a complex array of health inequities for individuals, families, and communities. Consequently, in addition to a conventional criminal justice approach, anti-trafficking scholars have increasingly called for a public health a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01573-5 |
_version_ | 1784590405643272192 |
---|---|
author | Wretman, Christopher J. Macy, Rebecca J. Stylianou, Amanda M. Teekah, Anita S. Ebright, Elizabeth N. Kim, Jeongsuk Luo, Jia Rizo, Cynthia Fraga |
author_facet | Wretman, Christopher J. Macy, Rebecca J. Stylianou, Amanda M. Teekah, Anita S. Ebright, Elizabeth N. Kim, Jeongsuk Luo, Jia Rizo, Cynthia Fraga |
author_sort | Wretman, Christopher J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Human trafficking is a serious global challenge associated with a complex array of health inequities for individuals, families, and communities. Consequently, in addition to a conventional criminal justice approach, anti-trafficking scholars have increasingly called for a public health approach to address this global challenge. Such calls have emphasized that a comprehensive, robust, and social justice-informed public health strategy for anti-trafficking must include services to facilitate survivors’ HT exit and recovery, and to prevent their re-victimization. Fortunately, many community-based organizations and non-governmental organizations worldwide have heeded these calls and developed anti-trafficking programs for survivors. Unfortunately, despite the growing numbers of organizations providing anti-trafficking services, research concerning these programs’ effectiveness remains nascent overall, and even more scant when filtered through an equity focus. METHODS: To advance the field by developing guidance concerning how best to evaluate anti-human trafficking programs, an ongoing research project aims to conduct a mixed methods evaluability assessment of a prominent anti-trafficking program using a social justice framework. Guided by well-established evaluability assessment frameworks, the study activities include four sequential steps: (a) focusing the assessment, (b) developing the program theory and logic, (c) gathering feedback, and (d) applying the assessment findings. Activities will include qualitative interviews and focus groups, observations, and quantitative analysis of program data among others. Human subjects and ethical review for the evaluability assessment has been granted by the Office of Human Subjects Research at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. DISCUSSION: Once completed, evaluability assessment results will provide evidence and products that have the potential to guide both evaluation research and service provision not only for the specific organization under study, but also for other anti-human trafficking programs worldwide. Findings will be developed into a variety of dissemination products tailored for both practice professionals and researchers. In the interim, this protocol manuscript offers research strategies and recommendations that can help inform the development of other studies in the developing field of anti-trafficking program evaluation research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8547574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85475742021-10-27 Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program Wretman, Christopher J. Macy, Rebecca J. Stylianou, Amanda M. Teekah, Anita S. Ebright, Elizabeth N. Kim, Jeongsuk Luo, Jia Rizo, Cynthia Fraga Int J Equity Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Human trafficking is a serious global challenge associated with a complex array of health inequities for individuals, families, and communities. Consequently, in addition to a conventional criminal justice approach, anti-trafficking scholars have increasingly called for a public health approach to address this global challenge. Such calls have emphasized that a comprehensive, robust, and social justice-informed public health strategy for anti-trafficking must include services to facilitate survivors’ HT exit and recovery, and to prevent their re-victimization. Fortunately, many community-based organizations and non-governmental organizations worldwide have heeded these calls and developed anti-trafficking programs for survivors. Unfortunately, despite the growing numbers of organizations providing anti-trafficking services, research concerning these programs’ effectiveness remains nascent overall, and even more scant when filtered through an equity focus. METHODS: To advance the field by developing guidance concerning how best to evaluate anti-human trafficking programs, an ongoing research project aims to conduct a mixed methods evaluability assessment of a prominent anti-trafficking program using a social justice framework. Guided by well-established evaluability assessment frameworks, the study activities include four sequential steps: (a) focusing the assessment, (b) developing the program theory and logic, (c) gathering feedback, and (d) applying the assessment findings. Activities will include qualitative interviews and focus groups, observations, and quantitative analysis of program data among others. Human subjects and ethical review for the evaluability assessment has been granted by the Office of Human Subjects Research at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. DISCUSSION: Once completed, evaluability assessment results will provide evidence and products that have the potential to guide both evaluation research and service provision not only for the specific organization under study, but also for other anti-human trafficking programs worldwide. Findings will be developed into a variety of dissemination products tailored for both practice professionals and researchers. In the interim, this protocol manuscript offers research strategies and recommendations that can help inform the development of other studies in the developing field of anti-trafficking program evaluation research. BioMed Central 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8547574/ /pubmed/34702257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01573-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Wretman, Christopher J. Macy, Rebecca J. Stylianou, Amanda M. Teekah, Anita S. Ebright, Elizabeth N. Kim, Jeongsuk Luo, Jia Rizo, Cynthia Fraga Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program |
title | Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program |
title_full | Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program |
title_fullStr | Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program |
title_short | Study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program |
title_sort | study protocol for an evaluability assessment of an anti-human trafficking program |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01573-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wretmanchristopherj studyprotocolforanevaluabilityassessmentofanantihumantraffickingprogram AT macyrebeccaj studyprotocolforanevaluabilityassessmentofanantihumantraffickingprogram AT stylianouamandam studyprotocolforanevaluabilityassessmentofanantihumantraffickingprogram AT teekahanitas studyprotocolforanevaluabilityassessmentofanantihumantraffickingprogram AT ebrightelizabethn studyprotocolforanevaluabilityassessmentofanantihumantraffickingprogram AT kimjeongsuk studyprotocolforanevaluabilityassessmentofanantihumantraffickingprogram AT luojia studyprotocolforanevaluabilityassessmentofanantihumantraffickingprogram AT rizocynthiafraga studyprotocolforanevaluabilityassessmentofanantihumantraffickingprogram |