Cargando…

Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery – A split mouth randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of bupivacaine and lidocaine local anesthesia on the intra-surgical and post-surgical pain control in patients undergoing periodontal flap surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth design was employed in patients who are scheduled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tirumalasetty, Shanmukha Srinivas Manikanta, Chinniswami Doraisami, Dwarakanath, Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh, Penmetsa, Subhadra Gautami, Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sai Sruthima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746785
http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.2021853507
_version_ 1784590442308829184
author Tirumalasetty, Shanmukha Srinivas Manikanta
Chinniswami Doraisami, Dwarakanath
Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh
Penmetsa, Subhadra Gautami
Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sai Sruthima
author_facet Tirumalasetty, Shanmukha Srinivas Manikanta
Chinniswami Doraisami, Dwarakanath
Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh
Penmetsa, Subhadra Gautami
Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sai Sruthima
author_sort Tirumalasetty, Shanmukha Srinivas Manikanta
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of bupivacaine and lidocaine local anesthesia on the intra-surgical and post-surgical pain control in patients undergoing periodontal flap surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth design was employed in patients who are scheduled for periodontal flap surgery for at least two similar sextants with similar anesthetic techniques. Fifty patients (age range 16-65 years, 32 males and 28 females) enrolled in the present study. On one-site, the flap surgery was performed using 2% lidocaine with 1:200000 epinephrine and on the other with 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200000 epinephrine. Base line clinical parameters, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level were recorded. Pain during intra operative period, at the time of loss of numbness and for three consecutive days was measured using visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in the intra operative pain scores (p=0.0045) and pain scores at the time of loss of numbness (p=0.0005) but not at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after the surgery. CONCLUSION: Bupivacaine was markedy more effective than the lidocaine. Thus the usage of bupivacaine can be substantiated for periodontal surgeries for the control of pain in the intra operative and immediate post-operative period to increase patients’ comfort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8547754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85477542021-11-04 Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery – A split mouth randomized clinical trial Tirumalasetty, Shanmukha Srinivas Manikanta Chinniswami Doraisami, Dwarakanath Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh Penmetsa, Subhadra Gautami Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sai Sruthima Eur Oral Res Articles PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of bupivacaine and lidocaine local anesthesia on the intra-surgical and post-surgical pain control in patients undergoing periodontal flap surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, single-blind, split-mouth design was employed in patients who are scheduled for periodontal flap surgery for at least two similar sextants with similar anesthetic techniques. Fifty patients (age range 16-65 years, 32 males and 28 females) enrolled in the present study. On one-site, the flap surgery was performed using 2% lidocaine with 1:200000 epinephrine and on the other with 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200000 epinephrine. Base line clinical parameters, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level were recorded. Pain during intra operative period, at the time of loss of numbness and for three consecutive days was measured using visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the two groups in the intra operative pain scores (p=0.0045) and pain scores at the time of loss of numbness (p=0.0005) but not at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after the surgery. CONCLUSION: Bupivacaine was markedy more effective than the lidocaine. Thus the usage of bupivacaine can be substantiated for periodontal surgeries for the control of pain in the intra operative and immediate post-operative period to increase patients’ comfort. Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 2021-09-01 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8547754/ /pubmed/34746785 http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.2021853507 Text en Copyright © 2021 European Oral Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license ( (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses its use. The material cannot be used for commercial purposes. If the user remixes, transforms, or builds upon the material, he/she may not distribute the modified material. No warranties are given. The license may not give the user all of the permissions necessary for his/her intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how the material can be used.
spellingShingle Articles
Tirumalasetty, Shanmukha Srinivas Manikanta
Chinniswami Doraisami, Dwarakanath
Konathala, Santosh Venkata Ramesh
Penmetsa, Subhadra Gautami
Gottumukkala, Naga Venkata Satya Sai Sruthima
Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery – A split mouth randomized clinical trial
title Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery – A split mouth randomized clinical trial
title_full Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery – A split mouth randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery – A split mouth randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery – A split mouth randomized clinical trial
title_short Comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in periodontal Surgery – A split mouth randomized clinical trial
title_sort comparison of efficacy and pain perception using 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine in periodontal surgery – a split mouth randomized clinical trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746785
http://dx.doi.org/10.26650/eor.2021853507
work_keys_str_mv AT tirumalasettyshanmukhasrinivasmanikanta comparisonofefficacyandpainperceptionusing05bupivacaineand2lidocaineinperiodontalsurgeryasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT chinniswamidoraisamidwarakanath comparisonofefficacyandpainperceptionusing05bupivacaineand2lidocaineinperiodontalsurgeryasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT konathalasantoshvenkataramesh comparisonofefficacyandpainperceptionusing05bupivacaineand2lidocaineinperiodontalsurgeryasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT penmetsasubhadragautami comparisonofefficacyandpainperceptionusing05bupivacaineand2lidocaineinperiodontalsurgeryasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT gottumukkalanagavenkatasatyasaisruthima comparisonofefficacyandpainperceptionusing05bupivacaineand2lidocaineinperiodontalsurgeryasplitmouthrandomizedclinicaltrial