Cargando…
An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis (REDS) score to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores, to risk-stratify Emergency Department (ED) suspected sepsis patients for mortality. METHOD: A retrospective observat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1992495 |
_version_ | 1784590464168493056 |
---|---|
author | Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Shabbo, Luke Christie, Dylon |
author_facet | Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Shabbo, Luke Christie, Dylon |
author_sort | Sivayoham, Narani |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis (REDS) score to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores, to risk-stratify Emergency Department (ED) suspected sepsis patients for mortality. METHOD: A retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data. Adult patients admitted from the ED after receiving intravenous antibiotics for suspected sepsis in the year 2020, were studied. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded. The scores stated above were calculated for each patient. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for each score for the primary outcome measure, all-cause in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and cut-off points were identified by the statistical software. Scores above the cut-off point were deemed high-risk. The test characteristics of the high-risk groups were calculated. Comparisons were based on the AUROC curve and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk groups. Previously published cut-off points were also studied. Calibration was also studied. RESULTS: Of the 2594 patients studied, 332 (12.8%) died. The AUROC curve for the REDS score 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.75) was significantly greater than the AUROC curve for the SIRS criteria 0.51 (95% CI 0.49–0.53), p < .0001 and the NEWS2 score 0.69 (95% CI 0.67–0.70), p = .005, and similar to all other scores studied. Sensitivity for mortality at the respective cut-off points identified (REDS ≥3, NEWS2 ≥ 8, CURB65 ≥ 3, SOFA ≥3, MEDS ≥10 and PIRO ≥10) was greatest for the REDS score at 80.1% (95% CI 75.4–84.3) and significantly greater than the other scores. The sensitivity for mortality for an increase of two points from baseline in the SOFA score was 63% (95% CI 57.5–68.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this single centre study, the REDS score had either a greater AUROC curve or sensitivity for mortality compared to the comparator scores, at the respective cut-off points identified. KEY MESSAGES: The REDS score is a simple and objective scoring system to risk-stratify for mortality in emergency department (MED) patients with suspected sepsis. The REDS score is better or equivalent to existing scoring systems in its discrimination for mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8547872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85478722021-10-27 An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Shabbo, Luke Christie, Dylon Ann Med Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis (REDS) score to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores, to risk-stratify Emergency Department (ED) suspected sepsis patients for mortality. METHOD: A retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data. Adult patients admitted from the ED after receiving intravenous antibiotics for suspected sepsis in the year 2020, were studied. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded. The scores stated above were calculated for each patient. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for each score for the primary outcome measure, all-cause in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and cut-off points were identified by the statistical software. Scores above the cut-off point were deemed high-risk. The test characteristics of the high-risk groups were calculated. Comparisons were based on the AUROC curve and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk groups. Previously published cut-off points were also studied. Calibration was also studied. RESULTS: Of the 2594 patients studied, 332 (12.8%) died. The AUROC curve for the REDS score 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.75) was significantly greater than the AUROC curve for the SIRS criteria 0.51 (95% CI 0.49–0.53), p < .0001 and the NEWS2 score 0.69 (95% CI 0.67–0.70), p = .005, and similar to all other scores studied. Sensitivity for mortality at the respective cut-off points identified (REDS ≥3, NEWS2 ≥ 8, CURB65 ≥ 3, SOFA ≥3, MEDS ≥10 and PIRO ≥10) was greatest for the REDS score at 80.1% (95% CI 75.4–84.3) and significantly greater than the other scores. The sensitivity for mortality for an increase of two points from baseline in the SOFA score was 63% (95% CI 57.5–68.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this single centre study, the REDS score had either a greater AUROC curve or sensitivity for mortality compared to the comparator scores, at the respective cut-off points identified. KEY MESSAGES: The REDS score is a simple and objective scoring system to risk-stratify for mortality in emergency department (MED) patients with suspected sepsis. The REDS score is better or equivalent to existing scoring systems in its discrimination for mortality. Taylor & Francis 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8547872/ /pubmed/34686088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1992495 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Shabbo, Luke Christie, Dylon An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis |
title | An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis |
title_full | An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis |
title_fullStr | An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis |
title_full_unstemmed | An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis |
title_short | An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis |
title_sort | observational cohort study of the performance of the reds score compared to the sirs criteria, news2, curb65, sofa, meds and piro scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1992495 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sivayohamnarani anobservationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis AT hussainadiln anobservationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis AT shabboluke anobservationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis AT christiedylon anobservationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis AT sivayohamnarani observationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis AT hussainadiln observationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis AT shabboluke observationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis AT christiedylon observationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis |