Cargando…

An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis (REDS) score to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores, to risk-stratify Emergency Department (ED) suspected sepsis patients for mortality. METHOD: A retrospective observat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivayoham, Narani, Hussain, Adil N., Shabbo, Luke, Christie, Dylon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1992495
_version_ 1784590464168493056
author Sivayoham, Narani
Hussain, Adil N.
Shabbo, Luke
Christie, Dylon
author_facet Sivayoham, Narani
Hussain, Adil N.
Shabbo, Luke
Christie, Dylon
author_sort Sivayoham, Narani
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis (REDS) score to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores, to risk-stratify Emergency Department (ED) suspected sepsis patients for mortality. METHOD: A retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data. Adult patients admitted from the ED after receiving intravenous antibiotics for suspected sepsis in the year 2020, were studied. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded. The scores stated above were calculated for each patient. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for each score for the primary outcome measure, all-cause in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and cut-off points were identified by the statistical software. Scores above the cut-off point were deemed high-risk. The test characteristics of the high-risk groups were calculated. Comparisons were based on the AUROC curve and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk groups. Previously published cut-off points were also studied. Calibration was also studied. RESULTS: Of the 2594 patients studied, 332 (12.8%) died. The AUROC curve for the REDS score 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.75) was significantly greater than the AUROC curve for the SIRS criteria 0.51 (95% CI 0.49–0.53), p < .0001 and the NEWS2 score 0.69 (95% CI 0.67–0.70), p = .005, and similar to all other scores studied. Sensitivity for mortality at the respective cut-off points identified (REDS ≥3, NEWS2 ≥ 8, CURB65 ≥ 3, SOFA ≥3, MEDS ≥10 and PIRO ≥10) was greatest for the REDS score at 80.1% (95% CI 75.4–84.3) and significantly greater than the other scores. The sensitivity for mortality for an increase of two points from baseline in the SOFA score was 63% (95% CI 57.5–68.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this single centre study, the REDS score had either a greater AUROC curve or sensitivity for mortality compared to the comparator scores, at the respective cut-off points identified. KEY MESSAGES: The REDS score is a simple and objective scoring system to risk-stratify for mortality in emergency department (MED) patients with suspected sepsis. The REDS score is better or equivalent to existing scoring systems in its discrimination for mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8547872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85478722021-10-27 An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis Sivayoham, Narani Hussain, Adil N. Shabbo, Luke Christie, Dylon Ann Med Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of the Risk-stratification of Emergency Department suspected Sepsis (REDS) score to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores, to risk-stratify Emergency Department (ED) suspected sepsis patients for mortality. METHOD: A retrospective observational cohort study of prospectively collected data. Adult patients admitted from the ED after receiving intravenous antibiotics for suspected sepsis in the year 2020, were studied. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded. The scores stated above were calculated for each patient. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for each score for the primary outcome measure, all-cause in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC (AUROC) curves and cut-off points were identified by the statistical software. Scores above the cut-off point were deemed high-risk. The test characteristics of the high-risk groups were calculated. Comparisons were based on the AUROC curve and sensitivity for mortality of the high-risk groups. Previously published cut-off points were also studied. Calibration was also studied. RESULTS: Of the 2594 patients studied, 332 (12.8%) died. The AUROC curve for the REDS score 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.75) was significantly greater than the AUROC curve for the SIRS criteria 0.51 (95% CI 0.49–0.53), p < .0001 and the NEWS2 score 0.69 (95% CI 0.67–0.70), p = .005, and similar to all other scores studied. Sensitivity for mortality at the respective cut-off points identified (REDS ≥3, NEWS2 ≥ 8, CURB65 ≥ 3, SOFA ≥3, MEDS ≥10 and PIRO ≥10) was greatest for the REDS score at 80.1% (95% CI 75.4–84.3) and significantly greater than the other scores. The sensitivity for mortality for an increase of two points from baseline in the SOFA score was 63% (95% CI 57.5–68.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this single centre study, the REDS score had either a greater AUROC curve or sensitivity for mortality compared to the comparator scores, at the respective cut-off points identified. KEY MESSAGES: The REDS score is a simple and objective scoring system to risk-stratify for mortality in emergency department (MED) patients with suspected sepsis. The REDS score is better or equivalent to existing scoring systems in its discrimination for mortality. Taylor & Francis 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8547872/ /pubmed/34686088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1992495 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Sivayoham, Narani
Hussain, Adil N.
Shabbo, Luke
Christie, Dylon
An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
title An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
title_full An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
title_fullStr An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
title_full_unstemmed An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
title_short An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
title_sort observational cohort study of the performance of the reds score compared to the sirs criteria, news2, curb65, sofa, meds and piro scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34686088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1992495
work_keys_str_mv AT sivayohamnarani anobservationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis
AT hussainadiln anobservationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis
AT shabboluke anobservationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis
AT christiedylon anobservationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis
AT sivayohamnarani observationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis
AT hussainadiln observationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis
AT shabboluke observationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis
AT christiedylon observationalcohortstudyoftheperformanceoftheredsscorecomparedtothesirscriterianews2curb65sofamedsandpiroscorestoriskstratifyemergencydepartmentsuspectedsepsis