Cargando…
Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: Autogenic training (AT) is frequently used as therapeutic approach in multimodal pain therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of AT in individuals suffering from chronic pain in comparison to passive and active control groups. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6 |
_version_ | 1784590537814179840 |
---|---|
author | Kohlert, Antonia Wick, Katharina Rosendahl, Jenny |
author_facet | Kohlert, Antonia Wick, Katharina Rosendahl, Jenny |
author_sort | Kohlert, Antonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Autogenic training (AT) is frequently used as therapeutic approach in multimodal pain therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of AT in individuals suffering from chronic pain in comparison to passive and active control groups. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in Medline, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PubPsych and manual searches (last search April 7, 2021) were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Treatment guidelines and references of relevant articles and previous reviews were checked. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Full Text database, DART-Europe E-theses Portal, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD), and the Theses Database of the German National Library were screened to identify any unpublished material. RESULTS: A total of 13 eligible studies (k = 15 comparisons) including 576 participants were identified. Random-effects meta-analyses revealed a significantly positive, moderate effect of AT on the primary outcome pain compared to passive control groups (g = 0.58, 95% CI [0.36; 0.79], k = 9, I(2) = 0%). In comparison with other psychological interventions, no difference was found (g = − 0.05, 95% CI [− 0.30; 0.20], k = 6, I(2) = 0%). Sensitivity analyses proved the robustness of findings. Overall risk-of-bias judgment was ‘some concerns’ in the majority of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial effects of AT on pain reduction were demonstrated, but findings are prone to bias. Furthermore, high methodological quality RCTs are needed to strengthen the promising evidence of AT for individuals with chronic pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8548271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85482712021-10-27 Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Kohlert, Antonia Wick, Katharina Rosendahl, Jenny Int J Behav Med Full Length Manuscript BACKGROUND: Autogenic training (AT) is frequently used as therapeutic approach in multimodal pain therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of AT in individuals suffering from chronic pain in comparison to passive and active control groups. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in Medline, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PubPsych and manual searches (last search April 7, 2021) were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Treatment guidelines and references of relevant articles and previous reviews were checked. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Full Text database, DART-Europe E-theses Portal, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD), and the Theses Database of the German National Library were screened to identify any unpublished material. RESULTS: A total of 13 eligible studies (k = 15 comparisons) including 576 participants were identified. Random-effects meta-analyses revealed a significantly positive, moderate effect of AT on the primary outcome pain compared to passive control groups (g = 0.58, 95% CI [0.36; 0.79], k = 9, I(2) = 0%). In comparison with other psychological interventions, no difference was found (g = − 0.05, 95% CI [− 0.30; 0.20], k = 6, I(2) = 0%). Sensitivity analyses proved the robustness of findings. Overall risk-of-bias judgment was ‘some concerns’ in the majority of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial effects of AT on pain reduction were demonstrated, but findings are prone to bias. Furthermore, high methodological quality RCTs are needed to strengthen the promising evidence of AT for individuals with chronic pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6. Springer US 2021-10-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8548271/ /pubmed/34705227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Full Length Manuscript Kohlert, Antonia Wick, Katharina Rosendahl, Jenny Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | autogenic training for reducing chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Full Length Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kohlertantonia autogenictrainingforreducingchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wickkatharina autogenictrainingforreducingchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT rosendahljenny autogenictrainingforreducingchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |