Cargando…

Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Autogenic training (AT) is frequently used as therapeutic approach in multimodal pain therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of AT in individuals suffering from chronic pain in comparison to passive and active control groups. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kohlert, Antonia, Wick, Katharina, Rosendahl, Jenny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6
_version_ 1784590537814179840
author Kohlert, Antonia
Wick, Katharina
Rosendahl, Jenny
author_facet Kohlert, Antonia
Wick, Katharina
Rosendahl, Jenny
author_sort Kohlert, Antonia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Autogenic training (AT) is frequently used as therapeutic approach in multimodal pain therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of AT in individuals suffering from chronic pain in comparison to passive and active control groups. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in Medline, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PubPsych and manual searches (last search April 7, 2021) were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Treatment guidelines and references of relevant articles and previous reviews were checked. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Full Text database, DART-Europe E-theses Portal, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD), and the Theses Database of the German National Library were screened to identify any unpublished material. RESULTS: A total of 13 eligible studies (k = 15 comparisons) including 576 participants were identified. Random-effects meta-analyses revealed a significantly positive, moderate effect of AT on the primary outcome pain compared to passive control groups (g = 0.58, 95% CI [0.36; 0.79], k = 9, I(2) = 0%). In comparison with other psychological interventions, no difference was found (g = − 0.05, 95% CI [− 0.30; 0.20], k = 6, I(2) = 0%). Sensitivity analyses proved the robustness of findings. Overall risk-of-bias judgment was ‘some concerns’ in the majority of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial effects of AT on pain reduction were demonstrated, but findings are prone to bias. Furthermore, high methodological quality RCTs are needed to strengthen the promising evidence of AT for individuals with chronic pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8548271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85482712021-10-27 Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Kohlert, Antonia Wick, Katharina Rosendahl, Jenny Int J Behav Med Full Length Manuscript BACKGROUND: Autogenic training (AT) is frequently used as therapeutic approach in multimodal pain therapy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to investigate the efficacy of AT in individuals suffering from chronic pain in comparison to passive and active control groups. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search in Medline, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and PubPsych and manual searches (last search April 7, 2021) were conducted to locate randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Treatment guidelines and references of relevant articles and previous reviews were checked. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Full Text database, DART-Europe E-theses Portal, Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD), and the Theses Database of the German National Library were screened to identify any unpublished material. RESULTS: A total of 13 eligible studies (k = 15 comparisons) including 576 participants were identified. Random-effects meta-analyses revealed a significantly positive, moderate effect of AT on the primary outcome pain compared to passive control groups (g = 0.58, 95% CI [0.36; 0.79], k = 9, I(2) = 0%). In comparison with other psychological interventions, no difference was found (g = − 0.05, 95% CI [− 0.30; 0.20], k = 6, I(2) = 0%). Sensitivity analyses proved the robustness of findings. Overall risk-of-bias judgment was ‘some concerns’ in the majority of studies. CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial effects of AT on pain reduction were demonstrated, but findings are prone to bias. Furthermore, high methodological quality RCTs are needed to strengthen the promising evidence of AT for individuals with chronic pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6. Springer US 2021-10-27 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8548271/ /pubmed/34705227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Full Length Manuscript
Kohlert, Antonia
Wick, Katharina
Rosendahl, Jenny
Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Autogenic Training for Reducing Chronic Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort autogenic training for reducing chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Full Length Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34705227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-021-10038-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kohlertantonia autogenictrainingforreducingchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wickkatharina autogenictrainingforreducingchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT rosendahljenny autogenictrainingforreducingchronicpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials