Cargando…
Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Objective: This article explores the differences in the effectiveness and safety of the treatment of the upper urinary calculi between single-use flexible ureteroscope (su-fURS) and reusable flexible ureteroscope (ru-fURS). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.691170 |
_version_ | 1784590569899556864 |
---|---|
author | Meng, Chunyang Peng, Lei Li, Jinze Li, Yunxiang Li, Jinming Wu, Ji |
author_facet | Meng, Chunyang Peng, Lei Li, Jinze Li, Yunxiang Li, Jinming Wu, Ji |
author_sort | Meng, Chunyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This article explores the differences in the effectiveness and safety of the treatment of the upper urinary calculi between single-use flexible ureteroscope (su-fURS) and reusable flexible ureteroscope (ru-fURS). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus database, and CNKI databases within a period from the date of database establishment to November 2020. Stata 16 was used for calculation and statistical analyses. Results: A total of 1,020 patients were included in the seven studies. The statistical differences were only found in the Clavien–Dindo grade II postoperative complication [odds ratio (OR) 0.47; 95% CI 0.23–0.98; p = 0.04]. No significant statistical differences were observed in operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), and stone-free rate (SFR). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis results demonstrate that su-fURS, compared with ru-fURS, has similar effectiveness and better security for treating upper urinary calculi. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8548426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85484262021-10-28 Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Meng, Chunyang Peng, Lei Li, Jinze Li, Yunxiang Li, Jinming Wu, Ji Front Surg Surgery Objective: This article explores the differences in the effectiveness and safety of the treatment of the upper urinary calculi between single-use flexible ureteroscope (su-fURS) and reusable flexible ureteroscope (ru-fURS). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus database, and CNKI databases within a period from the date of database establishment to November 2020. Stata 16 was used for calculation and statistical analyses. Results: A total of 1,020 patients were included in the seven studies. The statistical differences were only found in the Clavien–Dindo grade II postoperative complication [odds ratio (OR) 0.47; 95% CI 0.23–0.98; p = 0.04]. No significant statistical differences were observed in operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), and stone-free rate (SFR). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis results demonstrate that su-fURS, compared with ru-fURS, has similar effectiveness and better security for treating upper urinary calculi. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8548426/ /pubmed/34722620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.691170 Text en Copyright © 2021 Meng, Peng, Li, Li, Li and Wu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Meng, Chunyang Peng, Lei Li, Jinze Li, Yunxiang Li, Jinming Wu, Ji Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparison Between Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope for Upper Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparison between single-use flexible ureteroscope and reusable flexible ureteroscope for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722620 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.691170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mengchunyang comparisonbetweensingleuseflexibleureteroscopeandreusableflexibleureteroscopeforupperurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT penglei comparisonbetweensingleuseflexibleureteroscopeandreusableflexibleureteroscopeforupperurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijinze comparisonbetweensingleuseflexibleureteroscopeandreusableflexibleureteroscopeforupperurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liyunxiang comparisonbetweensingleuseflexibleureteroscopeandreusableflexibleureteroscopeforupperurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijinming comparisonbetweensingleuseflexibleureteroscopeandreusableflexibleureteroscopeforupperurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuji comparisonbetweensingleuseflexibleureteroscopeandreusableflexibleureteroscopeforupperurinarycalculiasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |