Cargando…

Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Prognostic Significance in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND: Early gastric cancer (EGC) is invasive gastric cancer that invades no deeper than the submucosa, regardless of lymph node metastasis (LNM). It is mainly treated by surgery. Recently, the resection range of EGC has been minimized, but cancer recurrence and overall survival in some patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jinfeng, Wang, Liang, Li, Sha, Bai, Fei, Xie, Hailong, Shan, Hanguo, Liu, Zhuo, Ma, Tiexiang, Tang, Xiayu, Tang, Haibing, Qin, Ang, Lei, Sanlin, Zuo, Chaohui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.649035
_version_ 1784590630715916288
author Wang, Jinfeng
Wang, Liang
Li, Sha
Bai, Fei
Xie, Hailong
Shan, Hanguo
Liu, Zhuo
Ma, Tiexiang
Tang, Xiayu
Tang, Haibing
Qin, Ang
Lei, Sanlin
Zuo, Chaohui
author_facet Wang, Jinfeng
Wang, Liang
Li, Sha
Bai, Fei
Xie, Hailong
Shan, Hanguo
Liu, Zhuo
Ma, Tiexiang
Tang, Xiayu
Tang, Haibing
Qin, Ang
Lei, Sanlin
Zuo, Chaohui
author_sort Wang, Jinfeng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early gastric cancer (EGC) is invasive gastric cancer that invades no deeper than the submucosa, regardless of lymph node metastasis (LNM). It is mainly treated by surgery. Recently, the resection range of EGC has been minimized, but cancer recurrence and overall survival in some patients should be given high status. LNM is an important indicator of prognosis and treatment in gastric cancer. The law of the number and location of metastatic lymph nodes in EGC is not yet clear. Therefore, we aimed to identify the risk factors of LNM in radically resected EGC and guide treatment. METHODS: The clinicopathological factors of 611 patients with EGC were retrospectively analyzed in six hospitals between January 2010 and December 2016. The relationship between clinicopathological factors and LNM, as well as their prognostic significance, were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The rate of LNM was 20.0% in the 611 EGC patients. The depth of invasion, differentiation type, tumor diameter, morphological ulceration, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for LNM (P<0.05) by logistic regression analysis. Tumor location in the proximal third of the stomach and morphological ulceration were significant factors for group 2 LNM. Moreover, the 5-year survival rate was 94.9% for patients with no positive nodes, 88.5% for patients with 1-2 positive nodes, 64.3% for patients with 3-6 positive nodes, and 41.8% for patients with >6 metastatic nodes. Interestingly, the 7-year risk of relapse diminished for patients with no LNM or retrieved no less than 15 lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Fifteen lymph node dissection and D2 radical operation are the surgical options in case of high risk factors for LNM. Extended lymph node dissection (D2+) is recommended for morphological ulceration or disease located in the proximal third of the stomach due to their high rate of group 2 LNM. Furthermore, LNM is a significant prognostic factor of EGC. Moreover, lymph nodes can also play a significant role in the chemotherapeutic and radiotherapy approach for non-surgical patients with EGC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8548692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85486922021-10-28 Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Prognostic Significance in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study Wang, Jinfeng Wang, Liang Li, Sha Bai, Fei Xie, Hailong Shan, Hanguo Liu, Zhuo Ma, Tiexiang Tang, Xiayu Tang, Haibing Qin, Ang Lei, Sanlin Zuo, Chaohui Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Early gastric cancer (EGC) is invasive gastric cancer that invades no deeper than the submucosa, regardless of lymph node metastasis (LNM). It is mainly treated by surgery. Recently, the resection range of EGC has been minimized, but cancer recurrence and overall survival in some patients should be given high status. LNM is an important indicator of prognosis and treatment in gastric cancer. The law of the number and location of metastatic lymph nodes in EGC is not yet clear. Therefore, we aimed to identify the risk factors of LNM in radically resected EGC and guide treatment. METHODS: The clinicopathological factors of 611 patients with EGC were retrospectively analyzed in six hospitals between January 2010 and December 2016. The relationship between clinicopathological factors and LNM, as well as their prognostic significance, were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The rate of LNM was 20.0% in the 611 EGC patients. The depth of invasion, differentiation type, tumor diameter, morphological ulceration, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for LNM (P<0.05) by logistic regression analysis. Tumor location in the proximal third of the stomach and morphological ulceration were significant factors for group 2 LNM. Moreover, the 5-year survival rate was 94.9% for patients with no positive nodes, 88.5% for patients with 1-2 positive nodes, 64.3% for patients with 3-6 positive nodes, and 41.8% for patients with >6 metastatic nodes. Interestingly, the 7-year risk of relapse diminished for patients with no LNM or retrieved no less than 15 lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Fifteen lymph node dissection and D2 radical operation are the surgical options in case of high risk factors for LNM. Extended lymph node dissection (D2+) is recommended for morphological ulceration or disease located in the proximal third of the stomach due to their high rate of group 2 LNM. Furthermore, LNM is a significant prognostic factor of EGC. Moreover, lymph nodes can also play a significant role in the chemotherapeutic and radiotherapy approach for non-surgical patients with EGC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8548692/ /pubmed/34722232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.649035 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Wang, Li, Bai, Xie, Shan, Liu, Ma, Tang, Tang, Qin, Lei and Zuo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Jinfeng
Wang, Liang
Li, Sha
Bai, Fei
Xie, Hailong
Shan, Hanguo
Liu, Zhuo
Ma, Tiexiang
Tang, Xiayu
Tang, Haibing
Qin, Ang
Lei, Sanlin
Zuo, Chaohui
Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Prognostic Significance in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study
title Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Prognostic Significance in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study
title_full Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Prognostic Significance in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Prognostic Significance in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Prognostic Significance in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study
title_short Risk Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Its Prognostic Significance in Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study
title_sort risk factors of lymph node metastasis and its prognostic significance in early gastric cancer: a multicenter study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34722232
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.649035
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjinfeng riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT wangliang riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT lisha riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT baifei riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT xiehailong riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT shanhanguo riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT liuzhuo riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT matiexiang riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT tangxiayu riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT tanghaibing riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT qinang riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT leisanlin riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy
AT zuochaohui riskfactorsoflymphnodemetastasisanditsprognosticsignificanceinearlygastriccanceramulticenterstudy