Cargando…
Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 public health crisis has produced an immense and quickly evolving body of evidence. This research speed and volume, along with variability in quality, could overwhelm public health decision-makers striving to make timely decisions based on the best available evidence. In res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01436-1 |
_version_ | 1784590632598110208 |
---|---|
author | Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. Belita, Emily Traynor, Robyn L. Clark, Emily Hagerman, Leah Dobbins, Maureen |
author_facet | Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. Belita, Emily Traynor, Robyn L. Clark, Emily Hagerman, Leah Dobbins, Maureen |
author_sort | Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 public health crisis has produced an immense and quickly evolving body of evidence. This research speed and volume, along with variability in quality, could overwhelm public health decision-makers striving to make timely decisions based on the best available evidence. In response to this challenge, the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools developed a Rapid Evidence Service, building on internationally accepted rapid review methodologies, to address priority COVID-19 public health questions. RESULTS: Each week, the Rapid Evidence Service team receives requests from public health decision-makers, prioritizes questions received, and frames the prioritized topics into searchable questions. We develop and conduct a comprehensive search strategy and critically appraise all relevant evidence using validated tools. We synthesize the findings into a final report that includes key messages, with a rating of the certainty of the evidence using GRADE, as well as an overview of evidence and remaining knowledge gaps. Rapid reviews are typically completed and disseminated within two weeks. From May 2020 to July 21, 2021, we have answered more than 31 distinct questions and completed 32 updates as new evidence emerged. Reviews receive an average of 213 downloads per week, with some reaching over 7700. To date reviews have been accessed and cited around the world, and a more fulsome evaluation of impact on decision-making is planned. CONCLUSIONS: The development, evolution, and lessons learned from our process, presented here, provides a real-world example of how review-level evidence can be made available – rapidly and rigorously, and in response to decision-makers’ needs – during an unprecedented public health crisis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01436-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8548700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85487002021-10-27 Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. Belita, Emily Traynor, Robyn L. Clark, Emily Hagerman, Leah Dobbins, Maureen BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 public health crisis has produced an immense and quickly evolving body of evidence. This research speed and volume, along with variability in quality, could overwhelm public health decision-makers striving to make timely decisions based on the best available evidence. In response to this challenge, the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools developed a Rapid Evidence Service, building on internationally accepted rapid review methodologies, to address priority COVID-19 public health questions. RESULTS: Each week, the Rapid Evidence Service team receives requests from public health decision-makers, prioritizes questions received, and frames the prioritized topics into searchable questions. We develop and conduct a comprehensive search strategy and critically appraise all relevant evidence using validated tools. We synthesize the findings into a final report that includes key messages, with a rating of the certainty of the evidence using GRADE, as well as an overview of evidence and remaining knowledge gaps. Rapid reviews are typically completed and disseminated within two weeks. From May 2020 to July 21, 2021, we have answered more than 31 distinct questions and completed 32 updates as new evidence emerged. Reviews receive an average of 213 downloads per week, with some reaching over 7700. To date reviews have been accessed and cited around the world, and a more fulsome evaluation of impact on decision-making is planned. CONCLUSIONS: The development, evolution, and lessons learned from our process, presented here, provides a real-world example of how review-level evidence can be made available – rapidly and rigorously, and in response to decision-makers’ needs – during an unprecedented public health crisis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01436-1. BioMed Central 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8548700/ /pubmed/34706671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01436-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E. Belita, Emily Traynor, Robyn L. Clark, Emily Hagerman, Leah Dobbins, Maureen Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools |
title | Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools |
title_full | Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools |
title_fullStr | Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools |
title_full_unstemmed | Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools |
title_short | Methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of COVID-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools |
title_sort | methods to support evidence-informed decision-making in the midst of covid-19: creation and evolution of a rapid review service from the national collaborating centre for methods and tools |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01436-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neilsztramkosarahe methodstosupportevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginthemidstofcovid19creationandevolutionofarapidreviewservicefromthenationalcollaboratingcentreformethodsandtools AT belitaemily methodstosupportevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginthemidstofcovid19creationandevolutionofarapidreviewservicefromthenationalcollaboratingcentreformethodsandtools AT traynorrobynl methodstosupportevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginthemidstofcovid19creationandevolutionofarapidreviewservicefromthenationalcollaboratingcentreformethodsandtools AT clarkemily methodstosupportevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginthemidstofcovid19creationandevolutionofarapidreviewservicefromthenationalcollaboratingcentreformethodsandtools AT hagermanleah methodstosupportevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginthemidstofcovid19creationandevolutionofarapidreviewservicefromthenationalcollaboratingcentreformethodsandtools AT dobbinsmaureen methodstosupportevidenceinformeddecisionmakinginthemidstofcovid19creationandevolutionofarapidreviewservicefromthenationalcollaboratingcentreformethodsandtools |