Cargando…

Risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anticancer drugs without active comparators in patients who have exhausted standard of care treatment options are debated. We aimed to quantify the safety and the efficacy of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients who have exhausted standard of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moreau Bachelard, Camille, Coquan, Elodie, du Rusquec, Pauline, Paoletti, Xavier, Le Tourneau, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101130
_version_ 1784590687970263040
author Moreau Bachelard, Camille
Coquan, Elodie
du Rusquec, Pauline
Paoletti, Xavier
Le Tourneau, Christophe
author_facet Moreau Bachelard, Camille
Coquan, Elodie
du Rusquec, Pauline
Paoletti, Xavier
Le Tourneau, Christophe
author_sort Moreau Bachelard, Camille
collection PubMed
description Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anticancer drugs without active comparators in patients who have exhausted standard of care treatment options are debated. We aimed to quantify the safety and the efficacy of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients who have exhausted standard of care treatments from RCTs without active comparators. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to preferred reporting Items for systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (CRD42021243968). A systematic literature search of English language publications from January 1, 2000, to January 7, 2021, was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed). Eligible trials included all RCTs evaluating anticancer drugs in adult patients with advanced solid tumors with a control arm without any anticancer drug consisting of best supportive care with or without a placebo. RCTs performed in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant or maintenance settings were excluded, as were clinical trials evaluating anticancer drugs in combination with radiotherapy. Two authors (C.M.B. and E.C.) independently reviewed the studies for inclusion. Data from published reports were extracted by investigators, and random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Correlations between severe toxicity and efficacy was assessed using R(2) measures. Findings: Of 3551 studies screened, 128 eligible trials were found involving 47,432 patients. The HRs for PFS and OS were 0·58 [95%CI: 0·53–0·63] and 0·82 [95%CI: 0·78–0·85]. The absolute benefits however were limited with PFS and OS gains of 2·1 and 0·5 months. The absolute excesses in all grade, severe grade III, IV and V (death) adverse events between the two arms were +13·9%, 10·2%, and +0·5%. A weak correlation was measured between the excess of severe toxicity and efficacy (all R² < 0·2). Interpretation: Anticancer drugs evaluated in RCTs against no active treatment benefited trial participants. Severe toxicity did not significantly correlate with efficacy. FUNDING: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8548931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85489312021-11-04 Risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Moreau Bachelard, Camille Coquan, Elodie du Rusquec, Pauline Paoletti, Xavier Le Tourneau, Christophe EClinicalMedicine Research Paper Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of anticancer drugs without active comparators in patients who have exhausted standard of care treatment options are debated. We aimed to quantify the safety and the efficacy of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients who have exhausted standard of care treatments from RCTs without active comparators. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to preferred reporting Items for systematic review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (CRD42021243968). A systematic literature search of English language publications from January 1, 2000, to January 7, 2021, was performed using MEDLINE (PubMed). Eligible trials included all RCTs evaluating anticancer drugs in adult patients with advanced solid tumors with a control arm without any anticancer drug consisting of best supportive care with or without a placebo. RCTs performed in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant or maintenance settings were excluded, as were clinical trials evaluating anticancer drugs in combination with radiotherapy. Two authors (C.M.B. and E.C.) independently reviewed the studies for inclusion. Data from published reports were extracted by investigators, and random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Correlations between severe toxicity and efficacy was assessed using R(2) measures. Findings: Of 3551 studies screened, 128 eligible trials were found involving 47,432 patients. The HRs for PFS and OS were 0·58 [95%CI: 0·53–0·63] and 0·82 [95%CI: 0·78–0·85]. The absolute benefits however were limited with PFS and OS gains of 2·1 and 0·5 months. The absolute excesses in all grade, severe grade III, IV and V (death) adverse events between the two arms were +13·9%, 10·2%, and +0·5%. A weak correlation was measured between the excess of severe toxicity and efficacy (all R² < 0·2). Interpretation: Anticancer drugs evaluated in RCTs against no active treatment benefited trial participants. Severe toxicity did not significantly correlate with efficacy. FUNDING: None. Elsevier 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8548931/ /pubmed/34746718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101130 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Moreau Bachelard, Camille
Coquan, Elodie
du Rusquec, Pauline
Paoletti, Xavier
Le Tourneau, Christophe
Risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort risks and benefits of anticancer drugs in advanced cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8548931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34746718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101130
work_keys_str_mv AT moreaubachelardcamille risksandbenefitsofanticancerdrugsinadvancedcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT coquanelodie risksandbenefitsofanticancerdrugsinadvancedcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT durusquecpauline risksandbenefitsofanticancerdrugsinadvancedcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paolettixavier risksandbenefitsofanticancerdrugsinadvancedcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT letourneauchristophe risksandbenefitsofanticancerdrugsinadvancedcancerpatientsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis