Cargando…
Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bicuspid anatomy affects the discrepancy between CT-derived annular size and intraoperative size. We retrospectively analyzed annular measurements in 667 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Preoperative CT measurements of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00406-3 |
_version_ | 1784590700732481536 |
---|---|
author | Choe, Jooae Koo, Hyun Jung Kang, Joon-Won Kim, Joon Bum Kang, Hee Jun Yang, Dong Hyun |
author_facet | Choe, Jooae Koo, Hyun Jung Kang, Joon-Won Kim, Joon Bum Kang, Hee Jun Yang, Dong Hyun |
author_sort | Choe, Jooae |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bicuspid anatomy affects the discrepancy between CT-derived annular size and intraoperative size. We retrospectively analyzed annular measurements in 667 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Preoperative CT measurements of the aortic annulus were compared to surgically implanted valve sizes. To evaluate whether the bicuspid valve affects the differences between CT annulus diameter and surgical AVR size, patients with diameter larger by > 10% (CT-Lg group) on CT, compared to surgical AVR size, were compared with those having size difference < 10% (CT-Sim group). Propensity score matching yielded 183 matched patients from each group. Bicuspid aortic valve annulus parameters significantly correlated with surgical aortic valve size (r = 0.52–0.71; for all, p < 0.01). The most representative measurements corresponded to surgical aortic valve size were area-derived diameters in tricuspid aortic valve (r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and bicuspid without raphe (r = 0.71, p < 0.001), and perimeter-derived diameter in bicuspid with raphe (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, native valve type was not different between CT-Sim and CT-Lg groups. In multivariable analysis, the difference between CT-derived diameter and surgical AVR size was affected by the operator factor and types of prosthesis. Bicuspid aortic annulus diameters measured on CT showed a significant correlation with surgical aortic valve size. The difference between CT-derived diameter and surgical AVR size is affected by operator factor and the types of prosthesis but not affected by the bicuspid valve. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8549004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85490042021-10-28 Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement Choe, Jooae Koo, Hyun Jung Kang, Joon-Won Kim, Joon Bum Kang, Hee Jun Yang, Dong Hyun Sci Rep Article The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bicuspid anatomy affects the discrepancy between CT-derived annular size and intraoperative size. We retrospectively analyzed annular measurements in 667 patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Preoperative CT measurements of the aortic annulus were compared to surgically implanted valve sizes. To evaluate whether the bicuspid valve affects the differences between CT annulus diameter and surgical AVR size, patients with diameter larger by > 10% (CT-Lg group) on CT, compared to surgical AVR size, were compared with those having size difference < 10% (CT-Sim group). Propensity score matching yielded 183 matched patients from each group. Bicuspid aortic valve annulus parameters significantly correlated with surgical aortic valve size (r = 0.52–0.71; for all, p < 0.01). The most representative measurements corresponded to surgical aortic valve size were area-derived diameters in tricuspid aortic valve (r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and bicuspid without raphe (r = 0.71, p < 0.001), and perimeter-derived diameter in bicuspid with raphe (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, native valve type was not different between CT-Sim and CT-Lg groups. In multivariable analysis, the difference between CT-derived diameter and surgical AVR size was affected by the operator factor and types of prosthesis. Bicuspid aortic annulus diameters measured on CT showed a significant correlation with surgical aortic valve size. The difference between CT-derived diameter and surgical AVR size is affected by operator factor and the types of prosthesis but not affected by the bicuspid valve. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8549004/ /pubmed/34697359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00406-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Choe, Jooae Koo, Hyun Jung Kang, Joon-Won Kim, Joon Bum Kang, Hee Jun Yang, Dong Hyun Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement |
title | Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement |
title_full | Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement |
title_fullStr | Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement |
title_short | Aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using CT in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement |
title_sort | aortic annulus sizing in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves using ct in patients with surgical aortic valve replacement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00406-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choejooae aorticannulussizinginbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalvesusingctinpatientswithsurgicalaorticvalvereplacement AT koohyunjung aorticannulussizinginbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalvesusingctinpatientswithsurgicalaorticvalvereplacement AT kangjoonwon aorticannulussizinginbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalvesusingctinpatientswithsurgicalaorticvalvereplacement AT kimjoonbum aorticannulussizinginbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalvesusingctinpatientswithsurgicalaorticvalvereplacement AT kangheejun aorticannulussizinginbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalvesusingctinpatientswithsurgicalaorticvalvereplacement AT yangdonghyun aorticannulussizinginbicuspidandtricuspidaorticvalvesusingctinpatientswithsurgicalaorticvalvereplacement |