Cargando…

Unexpected Disparity in Photoinduced Reactions of C(60) and C(70) in Water with the Generation of O(2)(•–) or (1)O(2)

[Image: see text] Well-defined fullerene-PEG conjugates, C(60)-PEG (1) and two C(70)-PEG (2 and 3 with the addition sites on ab-[6,6] and cc-[6,6]-junctions), were prepared from their corresponding Prato monoadduct precursors. The resulting highly water-soluble fullerene-PEG conjugates 1–3 were eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liosi, Korinne, Stasyuk, Anton J., Masero, Fabio, Voityuk, Alexander A., Nauser, Thomas, Mougel, Victor, Solà, Miquel, Yamakoshi, Yoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.1c00239
_version_ 1784590710346874880
author Liosi, Korinne
Stasyuk, Anton J.
Masero, Fabio
Voityuk, Alexander A.
Nauser, Thomas
Mougel, Victor
Solà, Miquel
Yamakoshi, Yoko
author_facet Liosi, Korinne
Stasyuk, Anton J.
Masero, Fabio
Voityuk, Alexander A.
Nauser, Thomas
Mougel, Victor
Solà, Miquel
Yamakoshi, Yoko
author_sort Liosi, Korinne
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Well-defined fullerene-PEG conjugates, C(60)-PEG (1) and two C(70)-PEG (2 and 3 with the addition sites on ab-[6,6] and cc-[6,6]-junctions), were prepared from their corresponding Prato monoadduct precursors. The resulting highly water-soluble fullerene-PEG conjugates 1–3 were evaluated for their DNA-cleaving activities and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation under visible light irradiation. Unexpectedly, photoinduced cleavage of DNA by C(60)-PEG 1 was much higher than that by C(70)-PEG 2 and 3 with higher absorption intensity, especially in the presence of an electron donor (NADH). The preference of photoinduced ROS generation from fullerene-PEG conjugates 1–3 via the type II (energy transfer) or the type I (electron transfer) photoreaction was found to be dependent on the fullerene core (between C(60) and C(70)) and functionalization pattern of C(70) (between 2 and 3). This was clearly supported by the electron transfer rate obtained from cyclic voltammetry data and computationally estimated relative rate of each step of the type II and the type I reactions, with the finding that type II energy transfer reactions occurred in the inverted Marcus regime while type I electron transfer reactions proceeded in the normal Marcus regime. This finding on the disparity in the pathways of photoinduced reactions (type I versus type II) provides insights into the behavior of photosensitizers in water and the design of photodynamic therapy drugs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8549049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85490492021-10-28 Unexpected Disparity in Photoinduced Reactions of C(60) and C(70) in Water with the Generation of O(2)(•–) or (1)O(2) Liosi, Korinne Stasyuk, Anton J. Masero, Fabio Voityuk, Alexander A. Nauser, Thomas Mougel, Victor Solà, Miquel Yamakoshi, Yoko JACS Au [Image: see text] Well-defined fullerene-PEG conjugates, C(60)-PEG (1) and two C(70)-PEG (2 and 3 with the addition sites on ab-[6,6] and cc-[6,6]-junctions), were prepared from their corresponding Prato monoadduct precursors. The resulting highly water-soluble fullerene-PEG conjugates 1–3 were evaluated for their DNA-cleaving activities and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation under visible light irradiation. Unexpectedly, photoinduced cleavage of DNA by C(60)-PEG 1 was much higher than that by C(70)-PEG 2 and 3 with higher absorption intensity, especially in the presence of an electron donor (NADH). The preference of photoinduced ROS generation from fullerene-PEG conjugates 1–3 via the type II (energy transfer) or the type I (electron transfer) photoreaction was found to be dependent on the fullerene core (between C(60) and C(70)) and functionalization pattern of C(70) (between 2 and 3). This was clearly supported by the electron transfer rate obtained from cyclic voltammetry data and computationally estimated relative rate of each step of the type II and the type I reactions, with the finding that type II energy transfer reactions occurred in the inverted Marcus regime while type I electron transfer reactions proceeded in the normal Marcus regime. This finding on the disparity in the pathways of photoinduced reactions (type I versus type II) provides insights into the behavior of photosensitizers in water and the design of photodynamic therapy drugs. American Chemical Society 2021-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8549049/ /pubmed/34723263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.1c00239 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Liosi, Korinne
Stasyuk, Anton J.
Masero, Fabio
Voityuk, Alexander A.
Nauser, Thomas
Mougel, Victor
Solà, Miquel
Yamakoshi, Yoko
Unexpected Disparity in Photoinduced Reactions of C(60) and C(70) in Water with the Generation of O(2)(•–) or (1)O(2)
title Unexpected Disparity in Photoinduced Reactions of C(60) and C(70) in Water with the Generation of O(2)(•–) or (1)O(2)
title_full Unexpected Disparity in Photoinduced Reactions of C(60) and C(70) in Water with the Generation of O(2)(•–) or (1)O(2)
title_fullStr Unexpected Disparity in Photoinduced Reactions of C(60) and C(70) in Water with the Generation of O(2)(•–) or (1)O(2)
title_full_unstemmed Unexpected Disparity in Photoinduced Reactions of C(60) and C(70) in Water with the Generation of O(2)(•–) or (1)O(2)
title_short Unexpected Disparity in Photoinduced Reactions of C(60) and C(70) in Water with the Generation of O(2)(•–) or (1)O(2)
title_sort unexpected disparity in photoinduced reactions of c(60) and c(70) in water with the generation of o(2)(•–) or (1)o(2)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34723263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.1c00239
work_keys_str_mv AT liosikorinne unexpecteddisparityinphotoinducedreactionsofc60andc70inwaterwiththegenerationofo2or1o2
AT stasyukantonj unexpecteddisparityinphotoinducedreactionsofc60andc70inwaterwiththegenerationofo2or1o2
AT maserofabio unexpecteddisparityinphotoinducedreactionsofc60andc70inwaterwiththegenerationofo2or1o2
AT voityukalexandera unexpecteddisparityinphotoinducedreactionsofc60andc70inwaterwiththegenerationofo2or1o2
AT nauserthomas unexpecteddisparityinphotoinducedreactionsofc60andc70inwaterwiththegenerationofo2or1o2
AT mougelvictor unexpecteddisparityinphotoinducedreactionsofc60andc70inwaterwiththegenerationofo2or1o2
AT solamiquel unexpecteddisparityinphotoinducedreactionsofc60andc70inwaterwiththegenerationofo2or1o2
AT yamakoshiyoko unexpecteddisparityinphotoinducedreactionsofc60andc70inwaterwiththegenerationofo2or1o2