Cargando…

Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of boys present to surgical specialists later in infancy/early childhood for elective operative circumcision despite the higher procedural risks. This study aims to assess physician perspectives on access to neonatal circumcision across the United States and iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naha, Ushasi, Arora, Hans C., Walton, Ryan F., Rosoklija, Ilina, Skibley, Lindsay M., Johnson, Emilie K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00911-7
_version_ 1784590726068174848
author Naha, Ushasi
Arora, Hans C.
Walton, Ryan F.
Rosoklija, Ilina
Skibley, Lindsay M.
Johnson, Emilie K.
author_facet Naha, Ushasi
Arora, Hans C.
Walton, Ryan F.
Rosoklija, Ilina
Skibley, Lindsay M.
Johnson, Emilie K.
author_sort Naha, Ushasi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of boys present to surgical specialists later in infancy/early childhood for elective operative circumcision despite the higher procedural risks. This study aims to assess physician perspectives on access to neonatal circumcision across the United States and identify potential reasons contributing to disparities in access. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was electronically distributed to physician members of the Societies for Pediatric Urology and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine. Hospital characteristics and circumcision practices were assessed. Associations between NC availability and institutional characteristics were evaluated using chi-squared testing and multivariable logistic regression. Qualitative analyses of free-text comments were performed. RESULTS: A total of 367 physicians responded (129 urologists [41%], 188 pediatric hospitalists [59%]). Neonatal circumcision was available at 86% of hospitals represented. On univariate and multivariate analysis, the 50 hospitals that did not offer neonatal circumcision were more likely to be located in the Western region (odds ratio [OR] = 8.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1–25 vs. Midwest) and in an urban area (OR = 4.2; 95% CI 1.6–10 vs. suburban/rural) compared with hospitals that offered neonatal circumcision. Most common reasons for lack of availability included not a birth hospital (N = 22, 47%), lack of insurance coverage (N = 8, 17%), and low insurance reimbursement (N = 7, 15%). Institutional, regional, or provider availability (68%), insurance/payment (12.4%), and ethics (12.4%) were common themes in the qualitative comments. CONCLUSIONS: Overall availability of neonatal circumcision varied based on hospital characteristics, including geography. Information from this survey will inform development of interventions designed to offer neonatal circumcision equitably and comprehensively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-021-00911-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8549161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85491612021-10-27 Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey Naha, Ushasi Arora, Hans C. Walton, Ryan F. Rosoklija, Ilina Skibley, Lindsay M. Johnson, Emilie K. BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of boys present to surgical specialists later in infancy/early childhood for elective operative circumcision despite the higher procedural risks. This study aims to assess physician perspectives on access to neonatal circumcision across the United States and identify potential reasons contributing to disparities in access. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was electronically distributed to physician members of the Societies for Pediatric Urology and the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Hospital Medicine. Hospital characteristics and circumcision practices were assessed. Associations between NC availability and institutional characteristics were evaluated using chi-squared testing and multivariable logistic regression. Qualitative analyses of free-text comments were performed. RESULTS: A total of 367 physicians responded (129 urologists [41%], 188 pediatric hospitalists [59%]). Neonatal circumcision was available at 86% of hospitals represented. On univariate and multivariate analysis, the 50 hospitals that did not offer neonatal circumcision were more likely to be located in the Western region (odds ratio [OR] = 8.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1–25 vs. Midwest) and in an urban area (OR = 4.2; 95% CI 1.6–10 vs. suburban/rural) compared with hospitals that offered neonatal circumcision. Most common reasons for lack of availability included not a birth hospital (N = 22, 47%), lack of insurance coverage (N = 8, 17%), and low insurance reimbursement (N = 7, 15%). Institutional, regional, or provider availability (68%), insurance/payment (12.4%), and ethics (12.4%) were common themes in the qualitative comments. CONCLUSIONS: Overall availability of neonatal circumcision varied based on hospital characteristics, including geography. Information from this survey will inform development of interventions designed to offer neonatal circumcision equitably and comprehensively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12894-021-00911-7. BioMed Central 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8549161/ /pubmed/34706684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00911-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Naha, Ushasi
Arora, Hans C.
Walton, Ryan F.
Rosoklija, Ilina
Skibley, Lindsay M.
Johnson, Emilie K.
Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey
title Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey
title_full Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey
title_fullStr Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey
title_full_unstemmed Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey
title_short Neonatal circumcision availability in the United States: a physician survey
title_sort neonatal circumcision availability in the united states: a physician survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00911-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nahaushasi neonatalcircumcisionavailabilityintheunitedstatesaphysiciansurvey
AT arorahansc neonatalcircumcisionavailabilityintheunitedstatesaphysiciansurvey
AT waltonryanf neonatalcircumcisionavailabilityintheunitedstatesaphysiciansurvey
AT rosoklijailina neonatalcircumcisionavailabilityintheunitedstatesaphysiciansurvey
AT skibleylindsaym neonatalcircumcisionavailabilityintheunitedstatesaphysiciansurvey
AT johnsonemiliek neonatalcircumcisionavailabilityintheunitedstatesaphysiciansurvey