Cargando…
Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures
BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening can determine adherence to screening programs. An evaluation of validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring experience or satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening does not exist. Our objective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01430-7 |
_version_ | 1784590745619922944 |
---|---|
author | Selva, A. Selva, C. Álvarez-Pérez, Y. Torà, N. López, P. Terraza-Núñez, R. Rodríguez, V. Solà, I. |
author_facet | Selva, A. Selva, C. Álvarez-Pérez, Y. Torà, N. López, P. Terraza-Núñez, R. Rodríguez, V. Solà, I. |
author_sort | Selva, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening can determine adherence to screening programs. An evaluation of validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring experience or satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening does not exist. Our objective was to identify and critically appraise validated questionnaires for measuring patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. We conducted searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and BiblioPRO and assessed the methodological quality of studies and measurement properties of questionnaires according to the COSMIN guidelines for systematic reviews of PROMs. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019118527. RESULTS: We included 80 studies that used 75 questionnaires, of which only 5 were validated. Four questionnaires measured satisfaction with endoscopy: two in the context of colorectal cancer screening (for colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy) and two for non-screening endoscopy. One questionnaire measured satisfaction with bowel preparation. The methodological quality of studies was variable. The questionnaires with evidence for sufficient content validity and internal consistency were: the CSSQP questionnaire, which measures safety and satisfaction with screening colonoscopy, and the Post-Procedure questionnaire which measures satisfaction with non-screening endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that a minority of existing PROMs for measuring patient satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening are validated. We identified two questionnaires with high potential for further use (CSSQP and the Post-Procedure questionnaire). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01430-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8549248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85492482021-10-27 Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures Selva, A. Selva, C. Álvarez-Pérez, Y. Torà, N. López, P. Terraza-Núñez, R. Rodríguez, V. Solà, I. BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening can determine adherence to screening programs. An evaluation of validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring experience or satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening does not exist. Our objective was to identify and critically appraise validated questionnaires for measuring patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. We conducted searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and BiblioPRO and assessed the methodological quality of studies and measurement properties of questionnaires according to the COSMIN guidelines for systematic reviews of PROMs. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019118527. RESULTS: We included 80 studies that used 75 questionnaires, of which only 5 were validated. Four questionnaires measured satisfaction with endoscopy: two in the context of colorectal cancer screening (for colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy) and two for non-screening endoscopy. One questionnaire measured satisfaction with bowel preparation. The methodological quality of studies was variable. The questionnaires with evidence for sufficient content validity and internal consistency were: the CSSQP questionnaire, which measures safety and satisfaction with screening colonoscopy, and the Post-Procedure questionnaire which measures satisfaction with non-screening endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that a minority of existing PROMs for measuring patient satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening are validated. We identified two questionnaires with high potential for further use (CSSQP and the Post-Procedure questionnaire). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01430-7. BioMed Central 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8549248/ /pubmed/34706652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01430-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Selva, A. Selva, C. Álvarez-Pérez, Y. Torà, N. López, P. Terraza-Núñez, R. Rodríguez, V. Solà, I. Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures |
title | Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures |
title_full | Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures |
title_fullStr | Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures |
title_short | Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures |
title_sort | satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34706652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01430-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT selvaa satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT selvac satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT alvarezperezy satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT toran satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT lopezp satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT terrazanunezr satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT rodriguezv satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT solai satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures AT satisfactionandexperiencewithcolorectalcancerscreeningasystematicreviewofvalidatedpatientreportedoutcomemeasures |