Cargando…
Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy in older adults can be associated with negative outcomes including falls, impaired cognition, reduced quality of life, and general and functional decline. It is not clear to what extent these are reversible if the number of medications is reduced. Primary care does not have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05685-9 |
_version_ | 1784590759900479488 |
---|---|
author | Mangin, Dee Lamarche, Larkin Agarwal, Gina Banh, Hoan Linh Dore Brown, Naomi Cassels, Alan Colwill, Kiska Dolovich, Lisa Farrell, Barbara Garrison, Scott Gillett, James Griffith, Lauren E. Holbrook, Anne Jurcic-Vrataric, Jane McCormack, James O’Reilly, Daria Raina, Parminder Richardson, Julie Risdon, Cathy Savelli, Mat Sherifali, Diana Siu, Henry Tarride, Jean-Éric Trimble, Johanna Ali, Abbas Freeman, Karla Langevin, Jessica Parascandalo, Jenna Templeton, Jeffrey A. Dragos, Steven Borhan, Sayem Thabane, Lehana |
author_facet | Mangin, Dee Lamarche, Larkin Agarwal, Gina Banh, Hoan Linh Dore Brown, Naomi Cassels, Alan Colwill, Kiska Dolovich, Lisa Farrell, Barbara Garrison, Scott Gillett, James Griffith, Lauren E. Holbrook, Anne Jurcic-Vrataric, Jane McCormack, James O’Reilly, Daria Raina, Parminder Richardson, Julie Risdon, Cathy Savelli, Mat Sherifali, Diana Siu, Henry Tarride, Jean-Éric Trimble, Johanna Ali, Abbas Freeman, Karla Langevin, Jessica Parascandalo, Jenna Templeton, Jeffrey A. Dragos, Steven Borhan, Sayem Thabane, Lehana |
author_sort | Mangin, Dee |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy in older adults can be associated with negative outcomes including falls, impaired cognition, reduced quality of life, and general and functional decline. It is not clear to what extent these are reversible if the number of medications is reduced. Primary care does not have a systematic approach for reducing inappropriate polypharmacy, and there are few, if any, approaches that account for the patient’s priorities and preferences. The primary objective of this study is to test the effect of TAPER (Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction), a structured operationalized clinical pathway focused on reducing inappropriate polypharmacy. TAPER integrates evidence tools for identifying potentially inappropriate medications, tapering, and monitoring guidance and explicit elicitation of patient priorities and preferences. We aim to determine the effect of TAPER on the number of medications (primary outcome) and health-related outcomes associated with polypharmacy in older adults. METHODS: We designed a multi-center randomized controlled trial, with the lead implementation site in Hamilton, Ontario. Older adults aged 70 years or older who are on five or more medications will be eligible to participate. A total of 360 participants will be recruited. Participants will be assigned to either the control or intervention arm. The intervention involves a comprehensive multidisciplinary medication review by pharmacists and physicians in partnership with patients. This review will be focused on reducing medication burden, with the assumption that this will reduce the risks and harms of polypharmacy. The control group is a wait list, and control patients will be given appointments for the TAPER intervention at a date after the final outcome assessment. All patients will be followed up and outcomes measured in both groups at baseline and 6 months. DISCUSSION: Our trial is unique in its design in that it aims to introduce an operationalized structured clinical pathway aimed to reduce polypharmacy in a primary care setting while at the same time recording patient’s goals and priorities for treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT02942927. First registered on October 24, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05685-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8549321 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85493212021-10-27 Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Mangin, Dee Lamarche, Larkin Agarwal, Gina Banh, Hoan Linh Dore Brown, Naomi Cassels, Alan Colwill, Kiska Dolovich, Lisa Farrell, Barbara Garrison, Scott Gillett, James Griffith, Lauren E. Holbrook, Anne Jurcic-Vrataric, Jane McCormack, James O’Reilly, Daria Raina, Parminder Richardson, Julie Risdon, Cathy Savelli, Mat Sherifali, Diana Siu, Henry Tarride, Jean-Éric Trimble, Johanna Ali, Abbas Freeman, Karla Langevin, Jessica Parascandalo, Jenna Templeton, Jeffrey A. Dragos, Steven Borhan, Sayem Thabane, Lehana Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy in older adults can be associated with negative outcomes including falls, impaired cognition, reduced quality of life, and general and functional decline. It is not clear to what extent these are reversible if the number of medications is reduced. Primary care does not have a systematic approach for reducing inappropriate polypharmacy, and there are few, if any, approaches that account for the patient’s priorities and preferences. The primary objective of this study is to test the effect of TAPER (Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction), a structured operationalized clinical pathway focused on reducing inappropriate polypharmacy. TAPER integrates evidence tools for identifying potentially inappropriate medications, tapering, and monitoring guidance and explicit elicitation of patient priorities and preferences. We aim to determine the effect of TAPER on the number of medications (primary outcome) and health-related outcomes associated with polypharmacy in older adults. METHODS: We designed a multi-center randomized controlled trial, with the lead implementation site in Hamilton, Ontario. Older adults aged 70 years or older who are on five or more medications will be eligible to participate. A total of 360 participants will be recruited. Participants will be assigned to either the control or intervention arm. The intervention involves a comprehensive multidisciplinary medication review by pharmacists and physicians in partnership with patients. This review will be focused on reducing medication burden, with the assumption that this will reduce the risks and harms of polypharmacy. The control group is a wait list, and control patients will be given appointments for the TAPER intervention at a date after the final outcome assessment. All patients will be followed up and outcomes measured in both groups at baseline and 6 months. DISCUSSION: Our trial is unique in its design in that it aims to introduce an operationalized structured clinical pathway aimed to reduce polypharmacy in a primary care setting while at the same time recording patient’s goals and priorities for treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT02942927. First registered on October 24, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05685-9. BioMed Central 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8549321/ /pubmed/34702336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05685-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Mangin, Dee Lamarche, Larkin Agarwal, Gina Banh, Hoan Linh Dore Brown, Naomi Cassels, Alan Colwill, Kiska Dolovich, Lisa Farrell, Barbara Garrison, Scott Gillett, James Griffith, Lauren E. Holbrook, Anne Jurcic-Vrataric, Jane McCormack, James O’Reilly, Daria Raina, Parminder Richardson, Julie Risdon, Cathy Savelli, Mat Sherifali, Diana Siu, Henry Tarride, Jean-Éric Trimble, Johanna Ali, Abbas Freeman, Karla Langevin, Jessica Parascandalo, Jenna Templeton, Jeffrey A. Dragos, Steven Borhan, Sayem Thabane, Lehana Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | team approach to polypharmacy evaluation and reduction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549321/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34702336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05685-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mangindee teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lamarchelarkin teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT agarwalgina teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT banhhoanlinh teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dorebrownnaomi teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT casselsalan teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT colwillkiska teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dolovichlisa teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT farrellbarbara teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT garrisonscott teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gillettjames teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT griffithlaurene teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT holbrookanne teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jurcicvrataricjane teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mccormackjames teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT oreillydaria teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rainaparminder teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT richardsonjulie teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT risdoncathy teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT savellimat teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sherifalidiana teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT siuhenry teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tarridejeaneric teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT trimblejohanna teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aliabbas teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT freemankarla teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT langevinjessica teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parascandalojenna teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT templetonjeffreya teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dragossteven teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT borhansayem teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thabanelehana teamapproachtopolypharmacyevaluationandreductionstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |