Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity

BACKGROUND: Algorithms for predicting retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment need to be validated in Indian settings to determine if the burden of screening can be reduced without compromising the sensitivity of existing gestation and weight-based cut offs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Deena, Madathil, Shamnad, Thukral, Anu, Sankar, M. Jeeva, Chandra, Parijat, Agarwal, Ramesh, Deorari, Ashok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2321-4
_version_ 1784590802453790720
author Thomas, Deena
Madathil, Shamnad
Thukral, Anu
Sankar, M. Jeeva
Chandra, Parijat
Agarwal, Ramesh
Deorari, Ashok
author_facet Thomas, Deena
Madathil, Shamnad
Thukral, Anu
Sankar, M. Jeeva
Chandra, Parijat
Agarwal, Ramesh
Deorari, Ashok
author_sort Thomas, Deena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Algorithms for predicting retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment need to be validated in Indian settings to determine if the burden of screening can be reduced without compromising the sensitivity of existing gestation and weight-based cut offs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the available algorithms namely, WINROP (Weight, Insulin-like growth factor I, Neonatal ROP), CHOP-ROP (children’s Hospital of Philadelphia ROP) and ROPScore in predicting type 1 ROP and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. STUDY DESIGN: Ambispective observational. SETTING: Tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in India. PARTICIPANTS: Neonates less than 32 weeks or less than 1500 g born between July, 2013 to June, 2019 (N=578), who underwent ROP screening. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Sensitivity, specificity and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of WINROP was 85% and 36%, for CHOP-ROP it was 54% and 71%, and for ROPScore it was 73% and 67%, respectively in detecting type 1 ROP. A total of 50/51 (98%) of neonates with type 1 ROP underwent treatment at median gestation of 9 weeks and median time from alarm to treatment by WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore was 7, 7 and 3 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore were not sensitive enough to replace the gestational age, weight and risk factor-based screening criteria for type 1 ROP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8549580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85495802021-10-27 Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity Thomas, Deena Madathil, Shamnad Thukral, Anu Sankar, M. Jeeva Chandra, Parijat Agarwal, Ramesh Deorari, Ashok Indian Pediatr Research Paper BACKGROUND: Algorithms for predicting retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment need to be validated in Indian settings to determine if the burden of screening can be reduced without compromising the sensitivity of existing gestation and weight-based cut offs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the available algorithms namely, WINROP (Weight, Insulin-like growth factor I, Neonatal ROP), CHOP-ROP (children’s Hospital of Philadelphia ROP) and ROPScore in predicting type 1 ROP and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. STUDY DESIGN: Ambispective observational. SETTING: Tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in India. PARTICIPANTS: Neonates less than 32 weeks or less than 1500 g born between July, 2013 to June, 2019 (N=578), who underwent ROP screening. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Sensitivity, specificity and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of WINROP was 85% and 36%, for CHOP-ROP it was 54% and 71%, and for ROPScore it was 73% and 67%, respectively in detecting type 1 ROP. A total of 50/51 (98%) of neonates with type 1 ROP underwent treatment at median gestation of 9 weeks and median time from alarm to treatment by WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore was 7, 7 and 3 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore were not sensitive enough to replace the gestational age, weight and risk factor-based screening criteria for type 1 ROP. Springer India 2021-05-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8549580/ /pubmed/34016801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2321-4 Text en © Indian Academy of Pediatrics 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Thomas, Deena
Madathil, Shamnad
Thukral, Anu
Sankar, M. Jeeva
Chandra, Parijat
Agarwal, Ramesh
Deorari, Ashok
Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity
title Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of winrop, chop-rop and ropscore in detecting type 1 retinopathy of prematurity
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2321-4
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasdeena diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity
AT madathilshamnad diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity
AT thukralanu diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity
AT sankarmjeeva diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity
AT chandraparijat diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity
AT agarwalramesh diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity
AT deorariashok diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity