Cargando…
Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity
BACKGROUND: Algorithms for predicting retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment need to be validated in Indian settings to determine if the burden of screening can be reduced without compromising the sensitivity of existing gestation and weight-based cut offs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer India
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2321-4 |
_version_ | 1784590802453790720 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Deena Madathil, Shamnad Thukral, Anu Sankar, M. Jeeva Chandra, Parijat Agarwal, Ramesh Deorari, Ashok |
author_facet | Thomas, Deena Madathil, Shamnad Thukral, Anu Sankar, M. Jeeva Chandra, Parijat Agarwal, Ramesh Deorari, Ashok |
author_sort | Thomas, Deena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Algorithms for predicting retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment need to be validated in Indian settings to determine if the burden of screening can be reduced without compromising the sensitivity of existing gestation and weight-based cut offs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the available algorithms namely, WINROP (Weight, Insulin-like growth factor I, Neonatal ROP), CHOP-ROP (children’s Hospital of Philadelphia ROP) and ROPScore in predicting type 1 ROP and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. STUDY DESIGN: Ambispective observational. SETTING: Tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in India. PARTICIPANTS: Neonates less than 32 weeks or less than 1500 g born between July, 2013 to June, 2019 (N=578), who underwent ROP screening. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Sensitivity, specificity and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of WINROP was 85% and 36%, for CHOP-ROP it was 54% and 71%, and for ROPScore it was 73% and 67%, respectively in detecting type 1 ROP. A total of 50/51 (98%) of neonates with type 1 ROP underwent treatment at median gestation of 9 weeks and median time from alarm to treatment by WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore was 7, 7 and 3 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore were not sensitive enough to replace the gestational age, weight and risk factor-based screening criteria for type 1 ROP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8549580 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer India |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85495802021-10-27 Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity Thomas, Deena Madathil, Shamnad Thukral, Anu Sankar, M. Jeeva Chandra, Parijat Agarwal, Ramesh Deorari, Ashok Indian Pediatr Research Paper BACKGROUND: Algorithms for predicting retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) requiring treatment need to be validated in Indian settings to determine if the burden of screening can be reduced without compromising the sensitivity of existing gestation and weight-based cut offs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the available algorithms namely, WINROP (Weight, Insulin-like growth factor I, Neonatal ROP), CHOP-ROP (children’s Hospital of Philadelphia ROP) and ROPScore in predicting type 1 ROP and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. STUDY DESIGN: Ambispective observational. SETTING: Tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in India. PARTICIPANTS: Neonates less than 32 weeks or less than 1500 g born between July, 2013 to June, 2019 (N=578), who underwent ROP screening. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Sensitivity, specificity and time from alarm to treatment by each algorithm. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of WINROP was 85% and 36%, for CHOP-ROP it was 54% and 71%, and for ROPScore it was 73% and 67%, respectively in detecting type 1 ROP. A total of 50/51 (98%) of neonates with type 1 ROP underwent treatment at median gestation of 9 weeks and median time from alarm to treatment by WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore was 7, 7 and 3 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore were not sensitive enough to replace the gestational age, weight and risk factor-based screening criteria for type 1 ROP. Springer India 2021-05-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8549580/ /pubmed/34016801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2321-4 Text en © Indian Academy of Pediatrics 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Thomas, Deena Madathil, Shamnad Thukral, Anu Sankar, M. Jeeva Chandra, Parijat Agarwal, Ramesh Deorari, Ashok Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity |
title | Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity |
title_full | Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity |
title_short | Diagnostic Accuracy of WINROP, CHOP-ROP and ROPScore in Detecting Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of winrop, chop-rop and ropscore in detecting type 1 retinopathy of prematurity |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549580/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-021-2321-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasdeena diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity AT madathilshamnad diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity AT thukralanu diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity AT sankarmjeeva diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity AT chandraparijat diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity AT agarwalramesh diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity AT deorariashok diagnosticaccuracyofwinropchopropandropscoreindetectingtype1retinopathyofprematurity |