Cargando…
High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations
OBJECTIVE: The current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased interest in the use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the transport setting. The purpose of this report was to outline the clinical workflow of using HFNC in transport and the results of a retrospective chart review of patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2021.09.008 |
_version_ | 1784590809180405760 |
---|---|
author | Reimer, Andrew P. Simpson, Bryson Brown, Abigail S. Passalacqua, Michael Keary, Jonathan Hustey, Fredric M. Kralovic, Damon |
author_facet | Reimer, Andrew P. Simpson, Bryson Brown, Abigail S. Passalacqua, Michael Keary, Jonathan Hustey, Fredric M. Kralovic, Damon |
author_sort | Reimer, Andrew P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased interest in the use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the transport setting. The purpose of this report was to outline the clinical workflow of using HFNC in transport and the results of a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing interhospital transfer on HFNC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patient transfers using HFNC between January 2018 and June 2019. The primary data abstracted from patient charts included patient demographics, transport distance, HFNC settings including flow rate in liters per minute and fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)), and vital signs. RESULTS: There was a total of 220 patients, 148 pediatric and 72 adult patients. Both pediatric groups experienced statistically significant reductions in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. The most common flow rate for both pediatric groups was 10 L/min and 50 L/min for adults. For pediatrics, the most common settings ranged between 30% and 50% Fio(2), with the most common setting being 30% Fio(2). The adult Fio(2) settings ranged from 30% to 100% Fio(2), with the 2 most common settings being 50% Fio(2) and 80% Fio(2). No patients were intubated during the transport encounter. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that HFNC is feasible and tolerated by patients and is an additional option for noninvasive ventilation in transport across the age continuum. Future studies are needed to compare HFNC with other noninvasive modalities that include assessing patient tolerance and comfort as contributing factors and to identify indications and contraindications for use in the transport setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8549608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85496082021-10-27 High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations Reimer, Andrew P. Simpson, Bryson Brown, Abigail S. Passalacqua, Michael Keary, Jonathan Hustey, Fredric M. Kralovic, Damon Air Med J Original Research OBJECTIVE: The current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased interest in the use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the transport setting. The purpose of this report was to outline the clinical workflow of using HFNC in transport and the results of a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing interhospital transfer on HFNC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patient transfers using HFNC between January 2018 and June 2019. The primary data abstracted from patient charts included patient demographics, transport distance, HFNC settings including flow rate in liters per minute and fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)), and vital signs. RESULTS: There was a total of 220 patients, 148 pediatric and 72 adult patients. Both pediatric groups experienced statistically significant reductions in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. The most common flow rate for both pediatric groups was 10 L/min and 50 L/min for adults. For pediatrics, the most common settings ranged between 30% and 50% Fio(2), with the most common setting being 30% Fio(2). The adult Fio(2) settings ranged from 30% to 100% Fio(2), with the 2 most common settings being 50% Fio(2) and 80% Fio(2). No patients were intubated during the transport encounter. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that HFNC is feasible and tolerated by patients and is an additional option for noninvasive ventilation in transport across the age continuum. Future studies are needed to compare HFNC with other noninvasive modalities that include assessing patient tolerance and comfort as contributing factors and to identify indications and contraindications for use in the transport setting. Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8549608/ /pubmed/35248341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2021.09.008 Text en © 2021 Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Reimer, Andrew P. Simpson, Bryson Brown, Abigail S. Passalacqua, Michael Keary, Jonathan Hustey, Fredric M. Kralovic, Damon High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations |
title | High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations |
title_full | High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations |
title_fullStr | High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations |
title_short | High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations |
title_sort | high-flow nasal cannula in transport: process, results, and considerations |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2021.09.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reimerandrewp highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations AT simpsonbryson highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations AT brownabigails highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations AT passalacquamichael highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations AT kearyjonathan highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations AT husteyfredricm highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations AT kralovicdamon highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations |