Cargando…

High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations

OBJECTIVE: The current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased interest in the use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the transport setting. The purpose of this report was to outline the clinical workflow of using HFNC in transport and the results of a retrospective chart review of patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reimer, Andrew P., Simpson, Bryson, Brown, Abigail S., Passalacqua, Michael, Keary, Jonathan, Hustey, Fredric M., Kralovic, Damon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2021.09.008
_version_ 1784590809180405760
author Reimer, Andrew P.
Simpson, Bryson
Brown, Abigail S.
Passalacqua, Michael
Keary, Jonathan
Hustey, Fredric M.
Kralovic, Damon
author_facet Reimer, Andrew P.
Simpson, Bryson
Brown, Abigail S.
Passalacqua, Michael
Keary, Jonathan
Hustey, Fredric M.
Kralovic, Damon
author_sort Reimer, Andrew P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased interest in the use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the transport setting. The purpose of this report was to outline the clinical workflow of using HFNC in transport and the results of a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing interhospital transfer on HFNC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patient transfers using HFNC between January 2018 and June 2019. The primary data abstracted from patient charts included patient demographics, transport distance, HFNC settings including flow rate in liters per minute and fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)), and vital signs. RESULTS: There was a total of 220 patients, 148 pediatric and 72 adult patients. Both pediatric groups experienced statistically significant reductions in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. The most common flow rate for both pediatric groups was 10 L/min and 50 L/min for adults. For pediatrics, the most common settings ranged between 30% and 50% Fio(2), with the most common setting being 30% Fio(2). The adult Fio(2) settings ranged from 30% to 100% Fio(2), with the 2 most common settings being 50% Fio(2) and 80% Fio(2). No patients were intubated during the transport encounter. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that HFNC is feasible and tolerated by patients and is an additional option for noninvasive ventilation in transport across the age continuum. Future studies are needed to compare HFNC with other noninvasive modalities that include assessing patient tolerance and comfort as contributing factors and to identify indications and contraindications for use in the transport setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8549608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85496082021-10-27 High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations Reimer, Andrew P. Simpson, Bryson Brown, Abigail S. Passalacqua, Michael Keary, Jonathan Hustey, Fredric M. Kralovic, Damon Air Med J Original Research OBJECTIVE: The current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has increased interest in the use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the transport setting. The purpose of this report was to outline the clinical workflow of using HFNC in transport and the results of a retrospective chart review of patients undergoing interhospital transfer on HFNC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patient transfers using HFNC between January 2018 and June 2019. The primary data abstracted from patient charts included patient demographics, transport distance, HFNC settings including flow rate in liters per minute and fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)), and vital signs. RESULTS: There was a total of 220 patients, 148 pediatric and 72 adult patients. Both pediatric groups experienced statistically significant reductions in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure. The most common flow rate for both pediatric groups was 10 L/min and 50 L/min for adults. For pediatrics, the most common settings ranged between 30% and 50% Fio(2), with the most common setting being 30% Fio(2). The adult Fio(2) settings ranged from 30% to 100% Fio(2), with the 2 most common settings being 50% Fio(2) and 80% Fio(2). No patients were intubated during the transport encounter. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that HFNC is feasible and tolerated by patients and is an additional option for noninvasive ventilation in transport across the age continuum. Future studies are needed to compare HFNC with other noninvasive modalities that include assessing patient tolerance and comfort as contributing factors and to identify indications and contraindications for use in the transport setting. Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8549608/ /pubmed/35248341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2021.09.008 Text en © 2021 Air Medical Journal Associates. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Research
Reimer, Andrew P.
Simpson, Bryson
Brown, Abigail S.
Passalacqua, Michael
Keary, Jonathan
Hustey, Fredric M.
Kralovic, Damon
High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations
title High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations
title_full High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations
title_fullStr High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations
title_full_unstemmed High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations
title_short High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Transport: Process, Results, and Considerations
title_sort high-flow nasal cannula in transport: process, results, and considerations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35248341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2021.09.008
work_keys_str_mv AT reimerandrewp highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations
AT simpsonbryson highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations
AT brownabigails highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations
AT passalacquamichael highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations
AT kearyjonathan highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations
AT husteyfredricm highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations
AT kralovicdamon highflownasalcannulaintransportprocessresultsandconsiderations