Cargando…
Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study)
ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) BACKGROUND: E-health based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have the potential to automate early identification of both nutritio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06351-1 |
_version_ | 1784590853854986240 |
---|---|
author | Erickson, Nicole Schinkoethe, T. Eckhardt, C. Storck, L. Joos, A. Liu, L. Ballmer, P. E. Mumm, F. Fey, T. Heinemann, V. |
author_facet | Erickson, Nicole Schinkoethe, T. Eckhardt, C. Storck, L. Joos, A. Liu, L. Ballmer, P. E. Mumm, F. Fey, T. Heinemann, V. |
author_sort | Erickson, Nicole |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) BACKGROUND: E-health based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have the potential to automate early identification of both nutrition status and distress status in cancer patients while facilitating treatment and encouraging patient participation. This cross-sectional study assessed the acceptability, accuracy, and clinical utility of PROMs collected via E-Health tools among patients undergoing treatment for stomach, colorectal, and pancreatic tumors. RESULTS: Eight-nine percent mostly, or completely, agreed that PROMs via tablets should be integrated in routine clinical care. Men were significantly more likely to require help completing the questionnaires than women (inv.OR= 0.51, 95% CI=(0.27, 0.95), p = 0.035). The level of help needed increased by 3% with each 1-year increase in age (inv. OR=1.03, 95% CI=(1.01, 1.06), p = 0.013). On average, a patient tended to declare weight which was 0.84 kg inferior to their true weight (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(-3.9, 5.6); SD: 2.41) and a height which was 0.95 cm superior to their true height (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(−5, 3.1); SD 2.08). Patient-reported nutrition status was significantly associated with the professionally generated assessment (95% CI=(2.27, 4.15), p < 0.001). As nutrition status declined, the distress score increased (95%CI=(0.88, 1.68), p < 0.001). Of the patients, 48.8% who were both distressed and malnourished requested supportive care to address their problems. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported assessments utilizing E-health tools are an accurate and efficient method to encourage patient participation in cancer care while simultaneously ensuring that regular assessment of psycho-social and nutritional aspects of care are efficiently integrated in the daily clinical routine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8549920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85499202021-10-29 Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) Erickson, Nicole Schinkoethe, T. Eckhardt, C. Storck, L. Joos, A. Liu, L. Ballmer, P. E. Mumm, F. Fey, T. Heinemann, V. Support Care Cancer Original Article ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) BACKGROUND: E-health based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have the potential to automate early identification of both nutrition status and distress status in cancer patients while facilitating treatment and encouraging patient participation. This cross-sectional study assessed the acceptability, accuracy, and clinical utility of PROMs collected via E-Health tools among patients undergoing treatment for stomach, colorectal, and pancreatic tumors. RESULTS: Eight-nine percent mostly, or completely, agreed that PROMs via tablets should be integrated in routine clinical care. Men were significantly more likely to require help completing the questionnaires than women (inv.OR= 0.51, 95% CI=(0.27, 0.95), p = 0.035). The level of help needed increased by 3% with each 1-year increase in age (inv. OR=1.03, 95% CI=(1.01, 1.06), p = 0.013). On average, a patient tended to declare weight which was 0.84 kg inferior to their true weight (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(-3.9, 5.6); SD: 2.41) and a height which was 0.95 cm superior to their true height (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(−5, 3.1); SD 2.08). Patient-reported nutrition status was significantly associated with the professionally generated assessment (95% CI=(2.27, 4.15), p < 0.001). As nutrition status declined, the distress score increased (95%CI=(0.88, 1.68), p < 0.001). Of the patients, 48.8% who were both distressed and malnourished requested supportive care to address their problems. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported assessments utilizing E-health tools are an accurate and efficient method to encourage patient participation in cancer care while simultaneously ensuring that regular assessment of psycho-social and nutritional aspects of care are efficiently integrated in the daily clinical routine. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8549920/ /pubmed/34159428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06351-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Erickson, Nicole Schinkoethe, T. Eckhardt, C. Storck, L. Joos, A. Liu, L. Ballmer, P. E. Mumm, F. Fey, T. Heinemann, V. Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) |
title | Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) |
title_full | Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) |
title_short | Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) |
title_sort | patient-reported outcome measures obtained via e-health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (pacc study) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06351-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ericksonnicole patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT schinkoethet patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT eckhardtc patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT storckl patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT joosa patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT liul patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT ballmerpe patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT mummf patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT feyt patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy AT heinemannv patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy |