Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study)

ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) BACKGROUND: E-health based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have the potential to automate early identification of both nutritio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erickson, Nicole, Schinkoethe, T., Eckhardt, C., Storck, L., Joos, A., Liu, L., Ballmer, P. E., Mumm, F., Fey, T., Heinemann, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06351-1
_version_ 1784590853854986240
author Erickson, Nicole
Schinkoethe, T.
Eckhardt, C.
Storck, L.
Joos, A.
Liu, L.
Ballmer, P. E.
Mumm, F.
Fey, T.
Heinemann, V.
author_facet Erickson, Nicole
Schinkoethe, T.
Eckhardt, C.
Storck, L.
Joos, A.
Liu, L.
Ballmer, P. E.
Mumm, F.
Fey, T.
Heinemann, V.
author_sort Erickson, Nicole
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) BACKGROUND: E-health based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have the potential to automate early identification of both nutrition status and distress status in cancer patients while facilitating treatment and encouraging patient participation. This cross-sectional study assessed the acceptability, accuracy, and clinical utility of PROMs collected via E-Health tools among patients undergoing treatment for stomach, colorectal, and pancreatic tumors. RESULTS: Eight-nine percent mostly, or completely, agreed that PROMs via tablets should be integrated in routine clinical care. Men were significantly more likely to require help completing the questionnaires than women (inv.OR= 0.51, 95% CI=(0.27, 0.95), p = 0.035). The level of help needed increased by 3% with each 1-year increase in age (inv. OR=1.03, 95% CI=(1.01, 1.06), p = 0.013). On average, a patient tended to declare weight which was 0.84 kg inferior to their true weight (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(-3.9, 5.6); SD: 2.41) and a height which was 0.95 cm superior to their true height (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(−5, 3.1); SD 2.08). Patient-reported nutrition status was significantly associated with the professionally generated assessment (95% CI=(2.27, 4.15), p < 0.001). As nutrition status declined, the distress score increased (95%CI=(0.88, 1.68), p < 0.001). Of the patients, 48.8% who were both distressed and malnourished requested supportive care to address their problems. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported assessments utilizing E-health tools are an accurate and efficient method to encourage patient participation in cancer care while simultaneously ensuring that regular assessment of psycho-social and nutritional aspects of care are efficiently integrated in the daily clinical routine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8549920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85499202021-10-29 Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) Erickson, Nicole Schinkoethe, T. Eckhardt, C. Storck, L. Joos, A. Liu, L. Ballmer, P. E. Mumm, F. Fey, T. Heinemann, V. Support Care Cancer Original Article ABSTRACT: Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study) BACKGROUND: E-health based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have the potential to automate early identification of both nutrition status and distress status in cancer patients while facilitating treatment and encouraging patient participation. This cross-sectional study assessed the acceptability, accuracy, and clinical utility of PROMs collected via E-Health tools among patients undergoing treatment for stomach, colorectal, and pancreatic tumors. RESULTS: Eight-nine percent mostly, or completely, agreed that PROMs via tablets should be integrated in routine clinical care. Men were significantly more likely to require help completing the questionnaires than women (inv.OR= 0.51, 95% CI=(0.27, 0.95), p = 0.035). The level of help needed increased by 3% with each 1-year increase in age (inv. OR=1.03, 95% CI=(1.01, 1.06), p = 0.013). On average, a patient tended to declare weight which was 0.84 kg inferior to their true weight (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(-3.9, 5.6); SD: 2.41) and a height which was 0.95 cm superior to their true height (Bland and Altman 95 % CI=(−5, 3.1); SD 2.08). Patient-reported nutrition status was significantly associated with the professionally generated assessment (95% CI=(2.27, 4.15), p < 0.001). As nutrition status declined, the distress score increased (95%CI=(0.88, 1.68), p < 0.001). Of the patients, 48.8% who were both distressed and malnourished requested supportive care to address their problems. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported assessments utilizing E-health tools are an accurate and efficient method to encourage patient participation in cancer care while simultaneously ensuring that regular assessment of psycho-social and nutritional aspects of care are efficiently integrated in the daily clinical routine. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8549920/ /pubmed/34159428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06351-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Erickson, Nicole
Schinkoethe, T.
Eckhardt, C.
Storck, L.
Joos, A.
Liu, L.
Ballmer, P. E.
Mumm, F.
Fey, T.
Heinemann, V.
Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study)
title Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study)
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study)
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study)
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study)
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures obtained via E-Health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (PaCC Study)
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures obtained via e-health tools ease the assessment burden and encourage patient participation in cancer care (pacc study)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8549920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34159428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06351-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ericksonnicole patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT schinkoethet patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT eckhardtc patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT storckl patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT joosa patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT liul patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT ballmerpe patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT mummf patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT feyt patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy
AT heinemannv patientreportedoutcomemeasuresobtainedviaehealthtoolseasetheassessmentburdenandencouragepatientparticipationincancercarepaccstudy