Cargando…
Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics
As the range of potential uses for Artificial Intelligence (AI), in particular machine learning (ML), has increased, so has awareness of the associated ethical issues. This increased awareness has led to the realisation that existing legislation and regulation provides insufficient protection to ind...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09563-w |
_version_ | 1784590873269370880 |
---|---|
author | Morley, Jessica Elhalal, Anat Garcia, Francesca Kinsey, Libby Mökander, Jakob Floridi, Luciano |
author_facet | Morley, Jessica Elhalal, Anat Garcia, Francesca Kinsey, Libby Mökander, Jakob Floridi, Luciano |
author_sort | Morley, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the range of potential uses for Artificial Intelligence (AI), in particular machine learning (ML), has increased, so has awareness of the associated ethical issues. This increased awareness has led to the realisation that existing legislation and regulation provides insufficient protection to individuals, groups, society, and the environment from AI harms. In response to this realisation, there has been a proliferation of principle-based ethics codes, guidelines and frameworks. However, it has become increasingly clear that a significant gap exists between the theory of AI ethics principles and the practical design of AI systems. In previous work, we analysed whether it is possible to close this gap between the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of AI ethics through the use of tools and methods designed to help AI developers, engineers, and designers translate principles into practice. We concluded that this method of closure is currently ineffective as almost all existing translational tools and methods are either too flexible (and thus vulnerable to ethics washing) or too strict (unresponsive to context). This raised the question: if, even with technical guidance, AI ethics is challenging to embed in the process of algorithmic design, is the entire pro-ethical design endeavour rendered futile? And, if no, then how can AI ethics be made useful for AI practitioners? This is the question we seek to address here by exploring why principles and technical translational tools are still needed even if they are limited, and how these limitations can be potentially overcome by providing theoretical grounding of a concept that has been termed ‘Ethics as a Service.’ |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8550007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85500072021-10-29 Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics Morley, Jessica Elhalal, Anat Garcia, Francesca Kinsey, Libby Mökander, Jakob Floridi, Luciano Minds Mach (Dordr) General Article As the range of potential uses for Artificial Intelligence (AI), in particular machine learning (ML), has increased, so has awareness of the associated ethical issues. This increased awareness has led to the realisation that existing legislation and regulation provides insufficient protection to individuals, groups, society, and the environment from AI harms. In response to this realisation, there has been a proliferation of principle-based ethics codes, guidelines and frameworks. However, it has become increasingly clear that a significant gap exists between the theory of AI ethics principles and the practical design of AI systems. In previous work, we analysed whether it is possible to close this gap between the ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of AI ethics through the use of tools and methods designed to help AI developers, engineers, and designers translate principles into practice. We concluded that this method of closure is currently ineffective as almost all existing translational tools and methods are either too flexible (and thus vulnerable to ethics washing) or too strict (unresponsive to context). This raised the question: if, even with technical guidance, AI ethics is challenging to embed in the process of algorithmic design, is the entire pro-ethical design endeavour rendered futile? And, if no, then how can AI ethics be made useful for AI practitioners? This is the question we seek to address here by exploring why principles and technical translational tools are still needed even if they are limited, and how these limitations can be potentially overcome by providing theoretical grounding of a concept that has been termed ‘Ethics as a Service.’ Springer Netherlands 2021-06-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550007/ /pubmed/34720418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09563-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General Article Morley, Jessica Elhalal, Anat Garcia, Francesca Kinsey, Libby Mökander, Jakob Floridi, Luciano Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics |
title | Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics |
title_full | Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics |
title_fullStr | Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics |
title_short | Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics |
title_sort | ethics as a service: a pragmatic operationalisation of ai ethics |
topic | General Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09563-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morleyjessica ethicsasaserviceapragmaticoperationalisationofaiethics AT elhalalanat ethicsasaserviceapragmaticoperationalisationofaiethics AT garciafrancesca ethicsasaserviceapragmaticoperationalisationofaiethics AT kinseylibby ethicsasaserviceapragmaticoperationalisationofaiethics AT mokanderjakob ethicsasaserviceapragmaticoperationalisationofaiethics AT floridiluciano ethicsasaserviceapragmaticoperationalisationofaiethics |