Cargando…

Collegial Relationships

Although collegial relationships are among the most prevalent types of interpersonal relationships in our lives, they have not been the subject of much philosophical study. In this paper, we take the first step in the process of developing an ethics of collegiality by establishing what qualifies two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Betzler, Monika, Löschke, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10165-9
_version_ 1784590888975990784
author Betzler, Monika
Löschke, Jörg
author_facet Betzler, Monika
Löschke, Jörg
author_sort Betzler, Monika
collection PubMed
description Although collegial relationships are among the most prevalent types of interpersonal relationships in our lives, they have not been the subject of much philosophical study. In this paper, we take the first step in the process of developing an ethics of collegiality by establishing what qualifies two people as colleagues and then by determining what it is that gives value to collegial relationships. We argue that A and B are colleagues if both exhibit sameness regarding at least two of the following three features: (i) the same work content or domain of activity; (ii) the same institutional affiliation or common purpose; and/or (iii) the same status or level of responsibility. Moreover, we describe how the potential value of collegial relationships is grounded in the relationship goods that two colleagues have reason to generate qua colleagues, namely, collegial solidarity and collegial recognition. Two interesting conclusions that can be drawn from our analysis are that one has to be proficient at one’s work if one is to be considered a good colleague and that we are also more likely to be better colleagues if we regard the work we do as valuable. Finally, we draw special attention to the working conditions that are conducive to the generation of good collegial relationships and suggest some policies to promote them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85500882021-10-29 Collegial Relationships Betzler, Monika Löschke, Jörg Ethical Theory Moral Pract Article Although collegial relationships are among the most prevalent types of interpersonal relationships in our lives, they have not been the subject of much philosophical study. In this paper, we take the first step in the process of developing an ethics of collegiality by establishing what qualifies two people as colleagues and then by determining what it is that gives value to collegial relationships. We argue that A and B are colleagues if both exhibit sameness regarding at least two of the following three features: (i) the same work content or domain of activity; (ii) the same institutional affiliation or common purpose; and/or (iii) the same status or level of responsibility. Moreover, we describe how the potential value of collegial relationships is grounded in the relationship goods that two colleagues have reason to generate qua colleagues, namely, collegial solidarity and collegial recognition. Two interesting conclusions that can be drawn from our analysis are that one has to be proficient at one’s work if one is to be considered a good colleague and that we are also more likely to be better colleagues if we regard the work we do as valuable. Finally, we draw special attention to the working conditions that are conducive to the generation of good collegial relationships and suggest some policies to promote them. Springer Netherlands 2021-02-05 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550088/ /pubmed/34720678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10165-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Betzler, Monika
Löschke, Jörg
Collegial Relationships
title Collegial Relationships
title_full Collegial Relationships
title_fullStr Collegial Relationships
title_full_unstemmed Collegial Relationships
title_short Collegial Relationships
title_sort collegial relationships
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10165-9
work_keys_str_mv AT betzlermonika collegialrelationships
AT loschkejorg collegialrelationships