Cargando…
Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models
The analysis of longitudinal, heterogeneous or unbalanced clustered data is of primary importance to a wide range of applications. The linear mixed model (LMM) is a popular and flexible extension of the linear model specifically designed for such purposes. Historically, a large proportion of materia...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6 |
_version_ | 1784590893743865856 |
---|---|
author | Maullin-Sapey, Thomas Nichols, Thomas E. |
author_facet | Maullin-Sapey, Thomas Nichols, Thomas E. |
author_sort | Maullin-Sapey, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The analysis of longitudinal, heterogeneous or unbalanced clustered data is of primary importance to a wide range of applications. The linear mixed model (LMM) is a popular and flexible extension of the linear model specifically designed for such purposes. Historically, a large proportion of material published on the LMM concerns the application of popular numerical optimization algorithms, such as Newton–Raphson, Fisher Scoring and expectation maximization to single-factor LMMs (i.e. LMMs that only contain one “factor” by which observations are grouped). However, in recent years, the focus of the LMM literature has moved towards the development of estimation and inference methods for more complex, multi-factored designs. In this paper, we present and derive new expressions for the extension of an algorithm classically used for single-factor LMM parameter estimation, Fisher Scoring, to multiple, crossed-factor designs. Through simulation and real data examples, we compare five variants of the Fisher Scoring algorithm with one another, as well as against a baseline established by the R package lme4, and find evidence of correctness and strong computational efficiency for four of the five proposed approaches. Additionally, we provide a new method for LMM Satterthwaite degrees of freedom estimation based on analytical results, which does not require iterative gradient estimation. Via simulation, we find that this approach produces estimates with both lower bias and lower variance than the existing methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8550113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85501132021-10-29 Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models Maullin-Sapey, Thomas Nichols, Thomas E. Stat Comput Article The analysis of longitudinal, heterogeneous or unbalanced clustered data is of primary importance to a wide range of applications. The linear mixed model (LMM) is a popular and flexible extension of the linear model specifically designed for such purposes. Historically, a large proportion of material published on the LMM concerns the application of popular numerical optimization algorithms, such as Newton–Raphson, Fisher Scoring and expectation maximization to single-factor LMMs (i.e. LMMs that only contain one “factor” by which observations are grouped). However, in recent years, the focus of the LMM literature has moved towards the development of estimation and inference methods for more complex, multi-factored designs. In this paper, we present and derive new expressions for the extension of an algorithm classically used for single-factor LMM parameter estimation, Fisher Scoring, to multiple, crossed-factor designs. Through simulation and real data examples, we compare five variants of the Fisher Scoring algorithm with one another, as well as against a baseline established by the R package lme4, and find evidence of correctness and strong computational efficiency for four of the five proposed approaches. Additionally, we provide a new method for LMM Satterthwaite degrees of freedom estimation based on analytical results, which does not require iterative gradient estimation. Via simulation, we find that this approach produces estimates with both lower bias and lower variance than the existing methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6. Springer US 2021-07-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550113/ /pubmed/34720460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Maullin-Sapey, Thomas Nichols, Thomas E. Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models |
title | Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models |
title_full | Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models |
title_fullStr | Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models |
title_full_unstemmed | Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models |
title_short | Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models |
title_sort | fisher scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maullinsapeythomas fisherscoringforcrossedfactorlinearmixedmodels AT nicholsthomase fisherscoringforcrossedfactorlinearmixedmodels |