Cargando…

Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models

The analysis of longitudinal, heterogeneous or unbalanced clustered data is of primary importance to a wide range of applications. The linear mixed model (LMM) is a popular and flexible extension of the linear model specifically designed for such purposes. Historically, a large proportion of materia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maullin-Sapey, Thomas, Nichols, Thomas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6
_version_ 1784590893743865856
author Maullin-Sapey, Thomas
Nichols, Thomas E.
author_facet Maullin-Sapey, Thomas
Nichols, Thomas E.
author_sort Maullin-Sapey, Thomas
collection PubMed
description The analysis of longitudinal, heterogeneous or unbalanced clustered data is of primary importance to a wide range of applications. The linear mixed model (LMM) is a popular and flexible extension of the linear model specifically designed for such purposes. Historically, a large proportion of material published on the LMM concerns the application of popular numerical optimization algorithms, such as Newton–Raphson, Fisher Scoring and expectation maximization to single-factor LMMs (i.e. LMMs that only contain one “factor” by which observations are grouped). However, in recent years, the focus of the LMM literature has moved towards the development of estimation and inference methods for more complex, multi-factored designs. In this paper, we present and derive new expressions for the extension of an algorithm classically used for single-factor LMM parameter estimation, Fisher Scoring, to multiple, crossed-factor designs. Through simulation and real data examples, we compare five variants of the Fisher Scoring algorithm with one another, as well as against a baseline established by the R package lme4, and find evidence of correctness and strong computational efficiency for four of the five proposed approaches. Additionally, we provide a new method for LMM Satterthwaite degrees of freedom estimation based on analytical results, which does not require iterative gradient estimation. Via simulation, we find that this approach produces estimates with both lower bias and lower variance than the existing methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85501132021-10-29 Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models Maullin-Sapey, Thomas Nichols, Thomas E. Stat Comput Article The analysis of longitudinal, heterogeneous or unbalanced clustered data is of primary importance to a wide range of applications. The linear mixed model (LMM) is a popular and flexible extension of the linear model specifically designed for such purposes. Historically, a large proportion of material published on the LMM concerns the application of popular numerical optimization algorithms, such as Newton–Raphson, Fisher Scoring and expectation maximization to single-factor LMMs (i.e. LMMs that only contain one “factor” by which observations are grouped). However, in recent years, the focus of the LMM literature has moved towards the development of estimation and inference methods for more complex, multi-factored designs. In this paper, we present and derive new expressions for the extension of an algorithm classically used for single-factor LMM parameter estimation, Fisher Scoring, to multiple, crossed-factor designs. Through simulation and real data examples, we compare five variants of the Fisher Scoring algorithm with one another, as well as against a baseline established by the R package lme4, and find evidence of correctness and strong computational efficiency for four of the five proposed approaches. Additionally, we provide a new method for LMM Satterthwaite degrees of freedom estimation based on analytical results, which does not require iterative gradient estimation. Via simulation, we find that this approach produces estimates with both lower bias and lower variance than the existing methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6. Springer US 2021-07-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550113/ /pubmed/34720460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Maullin-Sapey, Thomas
Nichols, Thomas E.
Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models
title Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models
title_full Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models
title_fullStr Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models
title_full_unstemmed Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models
title_short Fisher Scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models
title_sort fisher scoring for crossed factor linear mixed models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-021-10026-6
work_keys_str_mv AT maullinsapeythomas fisherscoringforcrossedfactorlinearmixedmodels
AT nicholsthomase fisherscoringforcrossedfactorlinearmixedmodels