Cargando…

Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items

We consider the following control problem on fair allocation of indivisible goods. Given a set I of items and a set of agents, each having strict linear preferences over the items, we ask for a minimum subset of the items whose deletion guarantees the existence of a proportional allocation in the re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorn, Britta, de Haan, Ronald, Schlotter, Ildikó
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-020-00794-4
_version_ 1784590921984114688
author Dorn, Britta
de Haan, Ronald
Schlotter, Ildikó
author_facet Dorn, Britta
de Haan, Ronald
Schlotter, Ildikó
author_sort Dorn, Britta
collection PubMed
description We consider the following control problem on fair allocation of indivisible goods. Given a set I of items and a set of agents, each having strict linear preferences over the items, we ask for a minimum subset of the items whose deletion guarantees the existence of a proportional allocation in the remaining instance; we call this problem Proportionality by Item Deletion (PID). Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm that solves PID for three agents. By contrast, we prove that PID is computationally intractable when the number of agents is unbounded, even if the number k of item deletions allowed is small—we show that the problem is [Formula: see text] -hard with respect to the parameter k. Additionally, we provide some tight lower and upper bounds on the complexity of PID when regarded as a function of |I| and k. Considering the possibilities for approximation, we prove a strong inapproximability result for PID. Finally, we also study a variant of the problem where we are given an allocation [Formula: see text] in advance as part of the input, and our aim is to delete a minimum number of items such that [Formula: see text] is proportional in the remainder; this variant turns out to be [Formula: see text] -hard for six agents, but polynomial-time solvable for two agents, and we show that it is [Formula: see text] -hard when parameterized by the number k of
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85502552021-10-29 Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items Dorn, Britta de Haan, Ronald Schlotter, Ildikó Algorithmica Article We consider the following control problem on fair allocation of indivisible goods. Given a set I of items and a set of agents, each having strict linear preferences over the items, we ask for a minimum subset of the items whose deletion guarantees the existence of a proportional allocation in the remaining instance; we call this problem Proportionality by Item Deletion (PID). Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm that solves PID for three agents. By contrast, we prove that PID is computationally intractable when the number of agents is unbounded, even if the number k of item deletions allowed is small—we show that the problem is [Formula: see text] -hard with respect to the parameter k. Additionally, we provide some tight lower and upper bounds on the complexity of PID when regarded as a function of |I| and k. Considering the possibilities for approximation, we prove a strong inapproximability result for PID. Finally, we also study a variant of the problem where we are given an allocation [Formula: see text] in advance as part of the input, and our aim is to delete a minimum number of items such that [Formula: see text] is proportional in the remainder; this variant turns out to be [Formula: see text] -hard for six agents, but polynomial-time solvable for two agents, and we show that it is [Formula: see text] -hard when parameterized by the number k of Springer US 2021-03-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550255/ /pubmed/34720294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-020-00794-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Dorn, Britta
de Haan, Ronald
Schlotter, Ildikó
Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items
title Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items
title_full Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items
title_fullStr Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items
title_full_unstemmed Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items
title_short Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items
title_sort obtaining a proportional allocation by deleting items
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-020-00794-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dornbritta obtainingaproportionalallocationbydeletingitems
AT dehaanronald obtainingaproportionalallocationbydeletingitems
AT schlotterildiko obtainingaproportionalallocationbydeletingitems