Cargando…
Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items
We consider the following control problem on fair allocation of indivisible goods. Given a set I of items and a set of agents, each having strict linear preferences over the items, we ask for a minimum subset of the items whose deletion guarantees the existence of a proportional allocation in the re...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-020-00794-4 |
_version_ | 1784590921984114688 |
---|---|
author | Dorn, Britta de Haan, Ronald Schlotter, Ildikó |
author_facet | Dorn, Britta de Haan, Ronald Schlotter, Ildikó |
author_sort | Dorn, Britta |
collection | PubMed |
description | We consider the following control problem on fair allocation of indivisible goods. Given a set I of items and a set of agents, each having strict linear preferences over the items, we ask for a minimum subset of the items whose deletion guarantees the existence of a proportional allocation in the remaining instance; we call this problem Proportionality by Item Deletion (PID). Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm that solves PID for three agents. By contrast, we prove that PID is computationally intractable when the number of agents is unbounded, even if the number k of item deletions allowed is small—we show that the problem is [Formula: see text] -hard with respect to the parameter k. Additionally, we provide some tight lower and upper bounds on the complexity of PID when regarded as a function of |I| and k. Considering the possibilities for approximation, we prove a strong inapproximability result for PID. Finally, we also study a variant of the problem where we are given an allocation [Formula: see text] in advance as part of the input, and our aim is to delete a minimum number of items such that [Formula: see text] is proportional in the remainder; this variant turns out to be [Formula: see text] -hard for six agents, but polynomial-time solvable for two agents, and we show that it is [Formula: see text] -hard when parameterized by the number k of |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8550255 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85502552021-10-29 Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items Dorn, Britta de Haan, Ronald Schlotter, Ildikó Algorithmica Article We consider the following control problem on fair allocation of indivisible goods. Given a set I of items and a set of agents, each having strict linear preferences over the items, we ask for a minimum subset of the items whose deletion guarantees the existence of a proportional allocation in the remaining instance; we call this problem Proportionality by Item Deletion (PID). Our main result is a polynomial-time algorithm that solves PID for three agents. By contrast, we prove that PID is computationally intractable when the number of agents is unbounded, even if the number k of item deletions allowed is small—we show that the problem is [Formula: see text] -hard with respect to the parameter k. Additionally, we provide some tight lower and upper bounds on the complexity of PID when regarded as a function of |I| and k. Considering the possibilities for approximation, we prove a strong inapproximability result for PID. Finally, we also study a variant of the problem where we are given an allocation [Formula: see text] in advance as part of the input, and our aim is to delete a minimum number of items such that [Formula: see text] is proportional in the remainder; this variant turns out to be [Formula: see text] -hard for six agents, but polynomial-time solvable for two agents, and we show that it is [Formula: see text] -hard when parameterized by the number k of Springer US 2021-03-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550255/ /pubmed/34720294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-020-00794-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Dorn, Britta de Haan, Ronald Schlotter, Ildikó Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items |
title | Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items |
title_full | Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items |
title_fullStr | Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items |
title_full_unstemmed | Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items |
title_short | Obtaining a Proportional Allocation by Deleting Items |
title_sort | obtaining a proportional allocation by deleting items |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-020-00794-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dornbritta obtainingaproportionalallocationbydeletingitems AT dehaanronald obtainingaproportionalallocationbydeletingitems AT schlotterildiko obtainingaproportionalallocationbydeletingitems |