Cargando…

Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem

Many shared memory algorithms have to deal with the problem of determining whether the value of a shared object has changed in between two successive accesses of that object by a process when the responses from both are the same. Motivated by this problem, we define the signal detection problem, whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellen, Faith, Gelashvili, Rati, Woelfel, Philipp, Zhu, Leqi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00224-020-09993-6
_version_ 1784590925029179392
author Ellen, Faith
Gelashvili, Rati
Woelfel, Philipp
Zhu, Leqi
author_facet Ellen, Faith
Gelashvili, Rati
Woelfel, Philipp
Zhu, Leqi
author_sort Ellen, Faith
collection PubMed
description Many shared memory algorithms have to deal with the problem of determining whether the value of a shared object has changed in between two successive accesses of that object by a process when the responses from both are the same. Motivated by this problem, we define the signal detection problem, which can be studied on a purely combinatorial level. Consider a system with n + 1 processes consisting of n readers and one signaller. The processes communicate through a shared blackboard that can store a value from a domain of size m. Processes are scheduled by an adversary. When scheduled, a process reads the blackboard, modifies its contents arbitrarily, and, provided it is a reader, returns a Boolean value. A reader must return true if the signaller has taken a step since the reader’s preceding step; otherwise it must return false. Intuitively, in a system with n processes, signal detection should require at least n bits of shared information, i.e., m ≥ 2(n). But a proof of this conjecture remains elusive. For the general case, we prove a lower bound of m ≥ n(2). For restricted versions of the problem, where the processes are oblivious or where the signaller must write a fixed sequence of values, we prove a tight lower bound of m ≥ 2(n). We also consider a version of the problem where each reader takes at most two steps. In this case, we prove that m = n + 1 blackboard values are necessary and sufficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8550272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85502722021-10-29 Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem Ellen, Faith Gelashvili, Rati Woelfel, Philipp Zhu, Leqi Theory Comput Syst Article Many shared memory algorithms have to deal with the problem of determining whether the value of a shared object has changed in between two successive accesses of that object by a process when the responses from both are the same. Motivated by this problem, we define the signal detection problem, which can be studied on a purely combinatorial level. Consider a system with n + 1 processes consisting of n readers and one signaller. The processes communicate through a shared blackboard that can store a value from a domain of size m. Processes are scheduled by an adversary. When scheduled, a process reads the blackboard, modifies its contents arbitrarily, and, provided it is a reader, returns a Boolean value. A reader must return true if the signaller has taken a step since the reader’s preceding step; otherwise it must return false. Intuitively, in a system with n processes, signal detection should require at least n bits of shared information, i.e., m ≥ 2(n). But a proof of this conjecture remains elusive. For the general case, we prove a lower bound of m ≥ n(2). For restricted versions of the problem, where the processes are oblivious or where the signaller must write a fixed sequence of values, we prove a tight lower bound of m ≥ 2(n). We also consider a version of the problem where each reader takes at most two steps. In this case, we prove that m = n + 1 blackboard values are necessary and sufficient. Springer US 2020-07-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550272/ /pubmed/34720702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00224-020-09993-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ellen, Faith
Gelashvili, Rati
Woelfel, Philipp
Zhu, Leqi
Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem
title Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem
title_full Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem
title_fullStr Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem
title_full_unstemmed Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem
title_short Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem
title_sort space lower bounds for the signal detection problem
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00224-020-09993-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenfaith spacelowerboundsforthesignaldetectionproblem
AT gelashvilirati spacelowerboundsforthesignaldetectionproblem
AT woelfelphilipp spacelowerboundsforthesignaldetectionproblem
AT zhuleqi spacelowerboundsforthesignaldetectionproblem