Cargando…
Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem
Many shared memory algorithms have to deal with the problem of determining whether the value of a shared object has changed in between two successive accesses of that object by a process when the responses from both are the same. Motivated by this problem, we define the signal detection problem, whi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00224-020-09993-6 |
_version_ | 1784590925029179392 |
---|---|
author | Ellen, Faith Gelashvili, Rati Woelfel, Philipp Zhu, Leqi |
author_facet | Ellen, Faith Gelashvili, Rati Woelfel, Philipp Zhu, Leqi |
author_sort | Ellen, Faith |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many shared memory algorithms have to deal with the problem of determining whether the value of a shared object has changed in between two successive accesses of that object by a process when the responses from both are the same. Motivated by this problem, we define the signal detection problem, which can be studied on a purely combinatorial level. Consider a system with n + 1 processes consisting of n readers and one signaller. The processes communicate through a shared blackboard that can store a value from a domain of size m. Processes are scheduled by an adversary. When scheduled, a process reads the blackboard, modifies its contents arbitrarily, and, provided it is a reader, returns a Boolean value. A reader must return true if the signaller has taken a step since the reader’s preceding step; otherwise it must return false. Intuitively, in a system with n processes, signal detection should require at least n bits of shared information, i.e., m ≥ 2(n). But a proof of this conjecture remains elusive. For the general case, we prove a lower bound of m ≥ n(2). For restricted versions of the problem, where the processes are oblivious or where the signaller must write a fixed sequence of values, we prove a tight lower bound of m ≥ 2(n). We also consider a version of the problem where each reader takes at most two steps. In this case, we prove that m = n + 1 blackboard values are necessary and sufficient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8550272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85502722021-10-29 Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem Ellen, Faith Gelashvili, Rati Woelfel, Philipp Zhu, Leqi Theory Comput Syst Article Many shared memory algorithms have to deal with the problem of determining whether the value of a shared object has changed in between two successive accesses of that object by a process when the responses from both are the same. Motivated by this problem, we define the signal detection problem, which can be studied on a purely combinatorial level. Consider a system with n + 1 processes consisting of n readers and one signaller. The processes communicate through a shared blackboard that can store a value from a domain of size m. Processes are scheduled by an adversary. When scheduled, a process reads the blackboard, modifies its contents arbitrarily, and, provided it is a reader, returns a Boolean value. A reader must return true if the signaller has taken a step since the reader’s preceding step; otherwise it must return false. Intuitively, in a system with n processes, signal detection should require at least n bits of shared information, i.e., m ≥ 2(n). But a proof of this conjecture remains elusive. For the general case, we prove a lower bound of m ≥ n(2). For restricted versions of the problem, where the processes are oblivious or where the signaller must write a fixed sequence of values, we prove a tight lower bound of m ≥ 2(n). We also consider a version of the problem where each reader takes at most two steps. In this case, we prove that m = n + 1 blackboard values are necessary and sufficient. Springer US 2020-07-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8550272/ /pubmed/34720702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00224-020-09993-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Ellen, Faith Gelashvili, Rati Woelfel, Philipp Zhu, Leqi Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem |
title | Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem |
title_full | Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem |
title_fullStr | Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem |
title_full_unstemmed | Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem |
title_short | Space Lower Bounds for the Signal Detection Problem |
title_sort | space lower bounds for the signal detection problem |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8550272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00224-020-09993-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellenfaith spacelowerboundsforthesignaldetectionproblem AT gelashvilirati spacelowerboundsforthesignaldetectionproblem AT woelfelphilipp spacelowerboundsforthesignaldetectionproblem AT zhuleqi spacelowerboundsforthesignaldetectionproblem |